Rayce,
I only wish I could help solve your issues, but I can't. However, I noticed an error on your Excel screen dump.
Bhp is approximately MAF / 0.8
not MAF x 0.8. So your 185 g/sec equates to about 231 bhp which is not much more than stock. Most TT 225 PS pro tunes aim for 210 to 215 g/sec peak.
I'm surprised the fuel trim adaptation is sufficient to deal with 15% overfuel across the board from the 4 bar FPR with no apparent ill-effects. It will show on your gas mileage though, so it's worth scaling KRKTE down if not just to avoid unanticipated complications down the line.
I know you're just starting with this and I haven't tuned a car myself but I respect your efforts. I would like to be in a position to compare my pro tune with stock when Tony adapts his flashing software for Windows XP. If I can flash it off the ECU and it's not encrypted, I'll compare, analyse and report the findings so we can all learn from it. Our engines are essentially the same so the calibration should be comparable to what you could achieve.
Regards.
Doug
Here's a good sanity check for the status of your MAF. Do a full-throttle run all the way to
redline in a single gear (second works fine). Group 002 shows air mass in g/s. Your peak
airflow should be roughly 0.80 times your horsepower. So, if you have a stock 150hp 1.8T,
expect around 120g/s. If you have a 225hp 1.8T remapped to 265hp, expect around 200g/s.
If you see significantly less than that, you MAF may be on the way out. This also works if you
are chipped, but "race" programs may make more power through timing, rather than airflow.
Therefore, take all readings with a grain of salt. Also remember that the MAF can be
knackered even if all values look reasonable!
Quote from TTweakers Guide....
Further if this is only five horsepower lol, I can't wait until I make 35 more... I have an easy ten MPH faster in the quarter mile.