black
Full Member
Karma: +0/-0
 Offline
Posts: 80
|
 |
« on: April 17, 2013, 05:40:12 AM »
|
|
|
got a problem with RS4 cause it does not follow the LDRXN curve. There is something like a wall at rlmax_w 204 but LDRXN is about 215. KFLDIMIX is not the issue Knock is not the issue I think it has to be something like a min restriction an not a factor because I can raise the values in LDRXN up to whatever I want, it stays 204...  ldrlms_w ldrlts_w nmot_w plsol plsolr_w pvdk rl rl_w rlmax_w rlsol_w 126,703 269,578 4599,75 2350 814,063 2340 191,25 209,211 204,11 204,11 |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: April 17, 2013, 05:48:06 AM by black »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
phila_dot
|
|
« Reply #1 on: April 17, 2013, 06:18:01 AM »
|
|
|
There is an entire function for this purpose!
Look at LDRLMX
Edit: i see you're on the right track, but those values aren't exactly legible
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
phila_dot
|
|
« Reply #2 on: April 17, 2013, 06:33:17 AM »
|
|
|
I can tell you that there's no mystery there.
Have you logged rlmx_w?
Log as much of the function as you can.
Looks like you've narrowed it down to knock (fldrrx_w), coolant temp (frxt), and IAT (frxta_w).
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
black
Full Member
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 80
|
|
« Reply #3 on: April 17, 2013, 06:51:28 AM »
|
|
|
I can tell you that there's no mystery there.
Have you logged rlmx_w?
Log as much of the function as you can.
Looks like you've narrowed it down to knock (fldrrx_w), coolant temp (frxt), and IAT (frxta_w).
maybe no mystery but I see the unwanted result  no, unfortunately no rlmx_w... but I have absolutely no knock retard (dwkrz_0-5 = 0) in this area and my LDRXNZK is all 100 |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
prj
|
|
« Reply #4 on: April 17, 2013, 07:26:50 AM »
|
|
|
Your problem is most likely KFLDHBN.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
phila_dot
|
|
« Reply #5 on: April 17, 2013, 07:34:30 AM »
|
|
|
Your problem is most likely KFLDHBN.
That was my first reaction as well, but it looks like ldrlts_w is 269.5 above. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
black
Full Member
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 80
|
|
« Reply #6 on: April 17, 2013, 07:40:01 AM »
|
|
|
Your problem is most likely KFLDHBN.
I thought about this if I make a mistake by understanding the values of KFLDHBN but I can not identify the connection of KFLHBN and LDRXRN in my log seems to be high enough: ldrlts_w nmot_w plsol plsolr_w pvdk rl rl_w rlmax_w rlsol_w rpm mbar mbar mbar 268,406 4348,25 2370 836,484 2050 180,75 181,336 202,898 202,898 257,086 5795,75 990 0 2370 127,5 128,18 204,211 55,2422 (Wped = 0 after acceleration) ldrlts_w falls and rlmax_w is rising and vice versa |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: April 17, 2013, 07:44:48 AM by black »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
masterj
|
|
« Reply #7 on: April 17, 2013, 07:50:07 AM »
|
|
|
I thought about this if I make a mistake by understanding the values of KFLDHBN
but I can not identify the connection of KFLHBN and LDRXRN in my log seems to be high enough:
ldrlts_w nmot_w plsol plsolr_w pvdk rl rl_w rlmax_w rlsol_w
rpm mbar mbar mbar
268,406 4348,25 2370 836,484 2050 180,75 181,336 202,898 202,898
257,086 5795,75 990 0 2370 127,5 128,18 204,211 55,2422 (Wped = 0 after acceleration)
ldrlts_w falls and rlmax_w is rising and vice versa
Just set it to FF and test.... Easy  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
black
Full Member
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 80
|
|
« Reply #8 on: April 17, 2013, 08:46:29 AM »
|
|
|
Just set it to FF and test.... Easy KFLDHBN cannot limit rlmax_w it is simply high enough yet. There must be another reason for this |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
IamwhoIam
|
|
« Reply #9 on: April 17, 2013, 09:25:58 AM »
|
|
|
KFLDHBN cannot limit rlmax_w it is simply high enough yet. There must be another reason for this If you don't post how high it is, and are sure that it's high enough, then you already seem to know all the answers, don't you? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I have no logs because I have a boost gauge (makes things easier)
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #10 on: April 17, 2013, 09:34:00 AM »
|
|
|
Stop futzing around and post complete logs (and/or graphs from ecuxplot) and the contents of KFLDHBN
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
phila_dot
|
|
« Reply #11 on: April 17, 2013, 09:54:52 AM »
|
|
|
ldrlts_w (from KFLDHBN) is 269.5 which means that KFLDHBN can't be the problem.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
black
Full Member
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 80
|
|
« Reply #12 on: April 17, 2013, 10:00:10 AM »
|
|
|
If you don't post how high it is, and are sure that it's high enough, then you already seem to know all the answers, don't you?
If you don't post how high it is, and are sure that it's high enough, then you already seem to know all the answers, don't you?
I have posted it above. ldrlts_w -------- why you calling it futzing?  I'm trying to solve it step by step. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
black
Full Member
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 80
|
|
« Reply #13 on: April 18, 2013, 08:38:56 AM »
|
|
|
So, KFTARX - not the issue - cause 1,01 in temp area KFTARXZK - not the issue cause 0,5 in all areas and no dwkrz_0-5 so no negative frxta_w influence KFFKRXTM - not the issue - cause only active above 116 deg C tmot FKRXTOL - not the issue - cause all values 1 - so not active so no negative frxt influence KFFLLDE and KFFWLLDE and KFFLDEO and KFFSLDE - not the issue cause no dwkrz_0-5 so no negative fldrrx_w or fldrxo_w influence And these values are factors so they would not result in a static rlmax_w value 204. They would influence the curve. Next KFLDHBN - far above LDRXN as you can see in ldrlts_w, so not the issue LDPBN - not the issue cause low under 204 (ldrlms_w) and not active LDORXN - not the issue - if this map hits in it will restrict rlmax_w to 90-114 KFLDRXO - not the issue - cause in RS4 oem all 0 so not active and additional TLDOBAN all zero So what else ?? I think I have to log other values someday |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #14 on: April 18, 2013, 08:50:21 AM »
|
|
|
Perhaps ASR is intervening?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
