Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: can`t save in tunerpro  (Read 23740 times)
ventovr6qc
Newbie
*

Karma: +2/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 14


« on: April 23, 2011, 11:00:56 PM »

can`t save the KRKTE scalars value
any suggestions?
Logged
Rated S
Newbie
*

Karma: +3/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 11



« Reply #1 on: April 29, 2011, 04:20:51 PM »

can`t save the KRKTE scalars value
any suggestions?

Are you using nyets 8D0907551M-20110328 file?
I seem to be having the same problem with the .xdf as well as one other person, it will not save the values of anything where as an older version of the .xdf will.
Logged

socals4.com/repair - ecux/vagcom/diy
Matt Danger
Full Member
***

Karma: +17/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 116


« Reply #2 on: April 29, 2011, 04:57:28 PM »

Are you using nyets 8D0907551M-20110328 file?
I seem to be having the same problem with the .xdf as well as one other person, it will not save the values of anything where as an older version of the .xdf will.

I'm the other person. A little more info:

Some maps cannot be altered with TunerPro's parameter editor when using the 8D0907551M-20110328 XDF. Some that I have found are:
- KRKTE
- CLAATS
- CLAATS2
- CDBKVP
- CDDSBKV
- CDAGR
- CKAGRL
- CDATR
- CDATS

There may be more. You can try changing the value, but when you "save" the value doesn't get stored. You can edit the value directly using TunerPro's hex editor, so I believe the problem is in the definition file.

Also, works fine with the older 20110122 definition file.
Logged
julex
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +78/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 923


« Reply #3 on: April 30, 2011, 08:37:02 AM »

TunerPro is cool but editing scalar falls victim to its slider resolution. What I mean by that is that the slider has only so many pixels and if you move it by one pixel you suddenly jump several values less/more, not a single unit the value normally can move around in tune itself.

Just grab the KRKTE slider and move it left/right until it moves and notice how much it changes. Now compare it to actual resolution of the scalar which is 0.000167 per step and you will immediately see the problem. You can also change to HEX view and see how many units it changes per slider move.

Due to this feature, free typing also doesn't take since it rounds up/down the the nearest 'pixel' value... SUPER RETARDED.

The proper way to do this is to convert high resolution scalars like KRKTE to one row table and done.

Attached is an example for KRKTE.



« Last Edit: April 30, 2011, 08:46:10 AM by julex » Logged
Rated S
Newbie
*

Karma: +3/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 11



« Reply #4 on: May 02, 2011, 05:28:55 PM »

I don't believe thats is the problem we (at least Matt Danger and I are having); though I am no expert in TunerPro and .xdf files.

When I use "8D0907551M-20110122.xdf" I can freely change the values and 'save' them and they do indeed change, however when I do the exact same thing with "8D0907551M-20110328.xdf" it never changes after I 'save'.
« Last Edit: May 02, 2011, 05:42:30 PM by Rated S » Logged

socals4.com/repair - ecux/vagcom/diy
julex
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +78/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 923


« Reply #5 on: May 02, 2011, 05:34:38 PM »

I don't believe thats is the problem we (at least Matt Danger and I are having); though I am no expert in TunerPro and .xdf files.

When I use "8D0907551M-20110122.xdf" I can freely change the values and 'save' them and they do indeed change, however when I do the exact same thing with "8D0907551M-20110328.xdf" it never changes after I 'save'.


The is one problem I described above where you won't be able to save KRKTE values in desired resolution and another with the XDF you listed above. For that reason I am using (as a base) 01/22 version which is almost identical but has no issues.

Cheers.
Logged
Rated S
Newbie
*

Karma: +3/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 11



« Reply #6 on: May 02, 2011, 05:42:45 PM »

What version of TunerPro are you running Julex? Mine does not look the same. I have Build: 5.00.7575.00


I do not have 'Major Order' which is where I assume you change it to a table.
« Last Edit: May 02, 2011, 05:46:12 PM by Rated S » Logged

socals4.com/repair - ecux/vagcom/diy
julex
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +78/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 923


« Reply #7 on: May 02, 2011, 08:12:25 PM »

What version of TunerPro are you running Julex? Mine does not look the same. I have Build: 5.00.7575.00


I do not have 'Major Order' which is where I assume you change it to a table.

I just created new table and moved address, scaling etc to it.

Same version in XP Compatibility Mode so that I can run plugins I paid for in case I decide to move to a different box... namely Checksum plugin.
Logged
Rated S
Newbie
*

Karma: +3/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 11



« Reply #8 on: May 03, 2011, 10:41:28 AM »

Testing that out now.
« Last Edit: May 03, 2011, 10:47:59 AM by Rated S » Logged

socals4.com/repair - ecux/vagcom/diy
Tony@NefMoto
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +130/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 1389


2001.5 Audi S4 Stage 3


« Reply #9 on: May 10, 2011, 12:55:28 PM »

When it comes to variable resolution, don't forget that these values get stored in the internal formats used by the ECU. If the variable is an 8bit byte, then it only has 256 different values, and a 16bit word only has 65536 different values.
« Last Edit: May 10, 2011, 03:51:44 PM by Tony@NefMoto » Logged

Remember you have to log in if you want to see the file attachments!
Info or questions, please add to the wiki: http://www.nefariousmotorsports.com/wiki
Follow NefMoto developments on Twitter: http://twitter.com/nefmoto
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +604/-166
Offline Offline

Posts: 12235


WWW
« Reply #10 on: May 10, 2011, 01:27:43 PM »


The is one problem I described above where you won't be able to save KRKTE values in desired resolution and another with the XDF you listed above. For that reason I am using (as a base) 01/22 version which is almost identical but has no issues.



i'd still like to know what happened here.. .can you see any obvious differences in the xdf?

should i migrate my converter to using xml?
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide (READ FIRST)
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum checker/corrrector for ME7.x

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience.
Matt Danger
Full Member
***

Karma: +17/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 116


« Reply #11 on: May 10, 2011, 01:50:14 PM »

Unfortunately, Julex's suggestion doesn't solve my problem.

If you launch TunerPro w/ the 8D0907551M-20110328 XDF and attempt to modify KRKTE, CLAATS, CLAATS2 or several other maps by using the slider OR entering a different value the new value is not written. If you edit with the hex editor the new value does get written. I'm not sure how to troubleshoot further.

I believe it is a problem with the XDF because simply switching to the older 20110122 XDF solves the problem.
Logged
julex
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +78/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 923


« Reply #12 on: May 10, 2011, 03:48:04 PM »

Unfortunately, Julex's suggestion doesn't solve my problem.

If you launch TunerPro w/ the 8D0907551M-20110328 XDF and attempt to modify KRKTE, CLAATS, CLAATS2 or several other maps by using the slider OR entering a different value the new value is not written. If you edit with the hex editor the new value does get written. I'm not sure how to troubleshoot further.

I believe it is a problem with the XDF because simply switching to the older 20110122 XDF solves the problem.

I believe the only difference between XDFs is how the MAF table is displayed so no biggie switching to old XDF.
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +604/-166
Offline Offline

Posts: 12235


WWW
« Reply #13 on: May 10, 2011, 06:50:58 PM »

I'm not sure how to troubleshoot further.

I believe it is a problem with the XDF because simply switching to the older 20110122 XDF solves the problem.

what, specifically, are the differences for those map definitions in the xdf? I can't see anything obvious.
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide (READ FIRST)
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum checker/corrrector for ME7.x

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience.
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +604/-166
Offline Offline

Posts: 12235


WWW
« Reply #14 on: May 10, 2011, 06:52:09 PM »


I believe the only difference between XDFs is how the MAF table is displayed so no biggie switching to old XDF.


No, there are several other changes...

And the old MAF table crashed tunerpro.
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide (READ FIRST)
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum checker/corrrector for ME7.x

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience.
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.034 seconds with 17 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.001s, 0q)