Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 06A906032LQ vs 06A906032LP  (Read 6469 times)
stabilo87
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 8


« on: February 26, 2012, 02:31:33 PM »

My Ecu is 06A906032LQ is it compatible with the 06A906032LP/PL def's?

Ifnot would my Ecu be able to be flashed with a LP/PL .bin

Thanks in advance

Jason
Logged
stabilo87
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 8


« Reply #1 on: February 27, 2012, 10:17:36 AM »

REDIRECT,06A-906-032-AWP.LBL,06A-906-032-LP  ; AWP (1J, 9M)
REDIRECT,06A-906-032-AWP.LBL,06A-906-032-LQ  ; AWP (1J, 9M)


Since they are both 1J, 9M does that mean the definitions should be the same?
Logged
rob.mwpropane
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +32/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 370


WWW
« Reply #2 on: February 29, 2012, 02:43:02 AM »

In order for "definition" files to line up, the code has to match the same locations. Try opening up WinOLS demo by EVC and having a look at both files in 2D mode. See if they line up. If you need further assistance let us know. I'm not familiar with the hardware differences, if any, on those vehicles.
Logged

This has nothing to do with cars but you can see my glorifying job at,

www.MWPropane.com
stabilo87
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 8


« Reply #3 on: February 29, 2012, 07:10:20 AM »

I ran through Tunerpro using argdub's XDF for LP/PL on the LQ and LP and it appears that the maps i have defined, such as LAMFA, MLHFM, etc all have the exact same values.

so that should mean these will work together?

Logged
Gonzo
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +20/-30
Offline Offline

Posts: 483


« Reply #4 on: February 29, 2012, 07:45:45 AM »

Yes
Logged
stabilo87
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 8


« Reply #5 on: February 29, 2012, 08:56:24 AM »

Thanks a bunch both of you Smiley
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.022 seconds with 17 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.002s, 0q)