K92
Full Member
Karma: +0/-3
 Offline
Posts: 137
|
 |
« Reply #45 on: February 03, 2020, 12:53:46 AM »
|
|
|
Yes, I measured ID on both mafs. AWM one had 66mm and the BAM one had 76mm. How to determine if maf is scaled correctly ? EDIT: I took dust protections off mafs and measured in the middle. Yes I have made measuring error  Right ones _ Awm id 60mm and Bam 70mm. Feels bad. Did you measure MAF iner diametar? Schloud BAM have 2.75", and standard 1.8T 2.25"
Second, you have 0.7 bar boost at 6000 RPM with K04, how you think that will result in higher flow than 160 g/s?
Give him boost, than you will have more airflow
Beacuse you have more req looad, and more boost
To get rid of timing oscilation set DARO,DAROS to 100 at last column
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
BlackT
|
|
« Reply #46 on: February 03, 2020, 01:27:41 AM »
|
|
|
Yes, I measured ID on both mafs. AWM one had 66mm and the BAM one had 76mm. How to determine if maf is scaled correctly ?EDIT: I took dust protections off mafs and measured in the middle. Yes I have made measuring error Right ones _ Awm id 60mm and Bam 70mm. Feels bad. Please read a S4tuning wiki couple of times, you have there most of answers for your question Another good MLFHFM sanity check is to log ps_w vs actual boost at WOT - ps_w should generally be slightly below actual boost. If it is over, your MAF is probably overscaledhttps://s4wiki.com/wiki/Tuning |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
K92
Full Member
Karma: +0/-3
Offline
Posts: 137
|
|
« Reply #47 on: February 03, 2020, 11:18:25 AM »
|
|
|
Is this considered good ? For the time saving purpose should i scale it further to get ps_w closer?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #48 on: February 03, 2020, 11:21:47 AM »
|
|
|
slight underscaling is fine if your load doesn't seem too off.
How far off is your KRKTE from theoretical?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
K92
Full Member
Karma: +0/-3
Offline
Posts: 137
|
|
« Reply #49 on: February 03, 2020, 12:07:37 PM »
|
|
|
slight underscaling is fine if your load doesn't seem too off.
How far off is your KRKTE from theoretical?
I need to study more to answer Your question. There is some wierd spike in fuel log also which came after installing new maf. I think I took too big bite. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #50 on: February 03, 2020, 02:37:37 PM »
|
|
|
I need to study more to answer Your question
Do NOT DO ANYTHING ELSE until you can answer my question. Full stop. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
xsix
Jr. Member
Karma: +0/-2
Offline
Posts: 32
|
|
« Reply #51 on: February 04, 2020, 01:52:19 PM »
|
|
|
BDW. Original MAF in original housing schpuld br able to read up to 220 g/s
Why stock MLHFM is scaled to 1005kg/h (~280g/s)@5v but real max actual reading is 220g/s ?  Thank you for reply. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
BlackT
|
|
« Reply #52 on: February 04, 2020, 02:16:48 PM »
|
|
|
Why stock MLHFM is scaled to 1005kg/h (~280g/s)@5v but real max actual reading is 220g/s ? Thank you for reply. Beacuse MAF offset on BOSCH is 200 kg/h 1000-200= 800 kg/h ~ 220 g/s At 1V you will see 200 kg/h in your file, but for real that is 0g/s and ECU see it as 0 g/s |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
K92
Full Member
Karma: +0/-3
Offline
Posts: 137
|
|
« Reply #53 on: February 04, 2020, 02:25:20 PM »
|
|
|
slight underscaling is fine if your load doesn't seem too off.
How far off is your KRKTE from theoretical?
Will check LTFT AND STFT with this scaling. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
xsix
Jr. Member
Karma: +0/-2
Offline
Posts: 32
|
|
« Reply #54 on: February 04, 2020, 02:28:34 PM »
|
|
|
Beacuse MAF offset on BOSCH is 200 kg/h
1000-200= 800 kg/h ~ 220 g/s
At 1V you will see 200 kg/h in your file, but for real that is 0g/s and ECU see it as 0 g/s
Yes, now I see that in funktionsrahmen. Thank you very much.  How max reading stock a4 maf sensor in 3inch housing ? Calculator to rescale maf diameter housing work properly for you or need some additional corrections ? OEM MAF from BAM 225 reading more than a4 sensor in 3inch housing ? |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 04, 2020, 02:34:56 PM by xsix »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
K92
Full Member
Karma: +0/-3
Offline
Posts: 137
|
|
« Reply #55 on: February 07, 2020, 03:52:03 AM »
|
|
|
My STFT part are a bit off -13% - +6% and LTFT 2%. ( Will reset and check LTFT again ) So to get them in place i should play with krkte in which case it would be off from my theoretical. So if i understood the subject correclty, my actual KRKTE should be very close to my calculated theoretical. So i guess i should scale maf further and see if changes are positive. slight underscaling is fine if your load doesn't seem too off.
How far off is your KRKTE from theoretical?
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 07, 2020, 04:03:58 AM by K92 »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
K92
Full Member
Karma: +0/-3
Offline
Posts: 137
|
|
« Reply #56 on: March 02, 2020, 10:35:42 AM »
|
|
|
So im away for some time as mine k04-025 just went poof. Cold side fins broken. Repair is expensive, new is expensive so i decided to go for GT2871R 064ar. If anybody have some experience with this turbo on 1.8t please comment the experience. Is the tuning really that different compared to small turbos as people say ?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
fknbrkn
Hero Member
Karma: +177/-18
 Online
Posts: 1405
mk4 1.8T AUM
|
|
« Reply #57 on: March 02, 2020, 09:17:28 PM »
|
|
|
Aaand if stock one expensive for you then im pretty sure youre talkin about chinese crap
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
K92
Full Member
Karma: +0/-3
Offline
Posts: 137
|
|
« Reply #58 on: March 02, 2020, 11:50:27 PM »
|
|
|
Aaand if stock one expensive for you then im pretty sure youre talkin about chinese crap
I mean expensive for K04-025 turbo as it is rare. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
prj
|
|
« Reply #59 on: March 03, 2020, 07:12:01 AM »
|
|
|
And the GT2871R is a real GT2871R? Or more like chinese turbo X named GT2871R by eBay? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
