|
|
|
nyet
|
 |
« Reply #286 on: April 02, 2012, 08:59:35 AM »
|
|
|
Also looking @ the logs... I seem to be flat lining the MAF, that means it's pretty much @ the end no? BTW this is max 24-25psi... guess it's time to upgrade!
The 8 bit maximum is 364 ish, the 16 bit maximum is 499 (iirc) Which are you logging (like nmot_w, dont log the wrong one  ) |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
NOTORIOUS VR
Administrator
Hero Member
Karma: +58/-7
 Offline
Posts: 1056
|
|
« Reply #287 on: April 02, 2012, 09:35:54 AM »
|
|
|
The 8 bit maximum is 364 ish, the 16 bit maximum is 499 (iirc) Which are you logging (like nmot_w, dont log the wrong one ) I am logging the right one (this time lol)... but JFC, I can believe there are that many combinations lol. That said, I am maxing my MAF @ 5600 RPM my values (from ECUx) is 376 (x 3.6 = 1353.6), the last bin in MLHFM is: 1354.1... so I'm maxing the sensor in this housing (at the same time that happens my AFR's go whacky/rich). What I am really curious about is my load and the flat line/notch around 4k RPM... I don't see why the load is being limited like that... any ideas?  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
jibberjive
|
|
« Reply #289 on: April 02, 2012, 10:00:46 PM »
|
|
|
Any insight on how to modify those maps to smooth out the notch for a slightly laggier setup (my boost profile follows NVR's pretty closely)? I've played around with those maps a little, and nothing I did alleviated the notch. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #290 on: April 02, 2012, 10:05:02 PM »
|
|
|
IIRC those do *not* affect actual load, only spec boost.
If you have a discontinuity in your actual load readings, i'd start with smoothing the various HFM maps.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
jibberjive
|
|
« Reply #291 on: April 02, 2012, 10:07:20 PM »
|
|
|
IIRC those do *not* affect actual load, only spec boost.
If you have a discontinuity in your actual load readings, i'd start with smoothing the various HFM maps.
I'll take some logs tonight and post in my build log here. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
phila_dot
|
|
« Reply #292 on: April 02, 2012, 11:55:25 PM »
|
|
|
IIRC those do *not* affect actual load, only spec boost.
Those maps are directly used in the calculation of actual load rl_w. Any insight on how to modify those maps to smooth out the notch for a slightly laggier setup (my boost profile follows NVR's pretty closely)? I've played around with those maps a little, and nothing I did alleviated the notch.
Unfortunately, none of the relevant variables are provided by ME7Info. I was falsely under the impression that B_nwvs was switched during cam changeover, but in fact it is set by SY_NWS > 0. This would not cause a hard switch. Try logging fnwue and see if it is related to the "notch". If so, KFPBRKNW may be the issue. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
NOTORIOUS VR
Administrator
Hero Member
Karma: +58/-7
Offline
Posts: 1056
|
|
« Reply #293 on: April 03, 2012, 06:53:30 AM »
|
|
|
IIRC those do *not* affect actual load, only spec boost
yes, you will notice on the last page my boost profile looked like this:  and setting the cam profiles to all 1.00 gave me the smooth notch then like you see in the more recent logs above. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
s5fourdoor
|
|
« Reply #294 on: April 03, 2012, 08:09:09 AM »
|
|
|
have a feeling it's time for your pro-m setup....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
phila_dot
|
|
« Reply #295 on: April 03, 2012, 08:34:21 AM »
|
|
|
yes, you will notice on the last page my boost profile looked like this: and setting the cam profiles to all 1.00 gave me the smooth notch then like you see in the more recent logs above. Can you post rl_w, rlmx_w, rlmax_w, and rlsol_w all from the same run? Set which map to all 1.00? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
NOTORIOUS VR
Administrator
Hero Member
Karma: +58/-7
Offline
Posts: 1056
|
|
« Reply #296 on: April 03, 2012, 08:34:47 AM »
|
|
|
have a feeling it's time for your pro-m setup....
most defiantly, waiting on a quote from a buddy as we speak  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #297 on: April 03, 2012, 08:47:20 AM »
|
|
|
Those maps are directly used in the calculation of actual load rl_w.
Yes, you're right, I was wrong Apologies. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
jibberjive
|
|
« Reply #299 on: April 04, 2012, 09:56:54 PM »
|
|
|
Playing with the torque management and stuff, what have you found that is helping spool the soonest?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
