setzi62
Full Member
Karma: +142/-0
 Offline
Posts: 249
|
 |
« Reply #90 on: September 19, 2011, 01:37:44 AM »
|
|
|
B_krldya is bit 0x00FD8C.15
B_krldyv is bit 0x00FD8E.2
zaldy is 0x380C51 (Byte)
The FR states that B_mf exists just for representation purpose
in the documentation, but is not present in the SW.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #91 on: September 19, 2011, 09:47:47 AM »
|
|
|
Thanks. I'll be back on the dyno saturday, so that should speed this effort up significantly.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Rick
|
|
« Reply #92 on: September 26, 2011, 12:51:49 PM »
|
|
|
Any updates Nyet?
Rick
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #93 on: September 26, 2011, 02:17:27 PM »
|
|
|
Sorry Rick. My dyno day got pushed back a week. Hopefully I'll have more this weekend.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Rick
|
|
« Reply #94 on: November 22, 2011, 04:48:08 AM »
|
|
|
Up for Nyet  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
masterj
|
|
« Reply #95 on: December 01, 2011, 04:14:23 AM »
|
|
|
I've tried to understand connection between KFMIRL and KFMIOP but failed. I've upped about half of my KFMIRL map, but don't now how to change KFMIOP. Please look at attached image and tell me if my kfmiop needs updating or not...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Rick
|
|
« Reply #96 on: December 01, 2011, 08:40:58 AM »
|
|
|
Yes it definitely does!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
masterj
|
|
« Reply #97 on: December 01, 2011, 08:44:55 AM »
|
|
|
Yes it definitely does!
could you be a little bit more specific? Because I've read this whole thread and still don't understand how one map relates to another? I mean is there some kind of formula to calculate KFMIOP based on KFMIRL? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Rick
|
|
« Reply #98 on: December 01, 2011, 12:24:08 PM »
|
|
|
In IRL you are requesting 204 load for an 85% torque request. In IOP you are saying that at 85% torque request you are only going to have a load of 140...
Rick.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #99 on: December 01, 2011, 01:25:56 PM »
|
|
|
In IRL you are requesting 204 load for an 85% torque request. In IOP you are saying that at 85% torque request you are only going to have a load of 140...
sortof, but i'd reword it to say In IOP you are saying that at load of 204, your output torque is 99%, which is higher than 85%, which results in the ECU interfering to reduce output torque. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
masterj
|
|
« Reply #100 on: December 01, 2011, 02:16:47 PM »
|
|
|
Oh, now I understand it... sort of So if I update IOP X axis at 145 to 200 it should be OK? Can I just edit axis instead of editing table? so if I understand correctly I have to update tables to something crazy like this (image attached) |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: December 01, 2011, 03:18:22 PM by masterj »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #101 on: December 01, 2011, 03:57:43 PM »
|
|
|
Can I just edit axis instead of editing table?
In theory, yes BTW the fact that you immediately came to this conclusion means you have the same understanding of IOP that I do, right or wrong ! I think some have taken the approach of editing the whole table by hand. I was THINKING about writing a program to generate the proper inverse (along with a rescaled axis) but never got around it it. I, personally, have not really played with IOP since my IRL is nearly stock. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: December 01, 2011, 04:01:07 PM by nyet »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
masterj
|
|
« Reply #102 on: December 01, 2011, 04:05:45 PM »
|
|
|
Can I just edit axis instead of editing table?
In theory, yes BTW the fact that you immediately came to this conclusion means you have the same understanding of IOP that I do, right or wrong ! I think some have taken the approach of editing the whole table by hand. I was THINKING about writing a program to generate the proper inverse (along with a rescaled axis) but never got around it it. I, personally, have not really played with IOP since my IRL is nearly stock. Well, let's hope that we understand this right Program would speed up whole process that is for sure... Maybe excel could do something like this? Oh and by the way, I have edited both the table and x axis because I wanted some nice numbers in table So my KFMIOP and KFMIRL tables look ok to you? I think that now IRL will not limit my boost up to 1.4 bar or something like that... |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: December 01, 2011, 04:09:19 PM by masterj »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #103 on: December 01, 2011, 04:09:45 PM »
|
|
|
Yea it looks like you are on the right track. Please let us know the results! BTW it shouldn't affect your boost, only timing.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: December 01, 2011, 04:11:54 PM by nyet »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
masterj
|
|
« Reply #104 on: December 01, 2011, 04:13:40 PM »
|
|
|
Yea it looks like you are on the right track. Please let us know the results! BTW it shouldn't affect your boost, only timing.
Thanks, nyet I will post impression of drive when I'll test this  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
