|
elRey
|
 |
« Reply #420 on: October 14, 2014, 09:58:31 AM »
|
|
|
maybe 10 hPa diff in lde is nothing to worry about when setting (unsetting really) B_lddy.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: October 14, 2014, 10:01:37 AM by elRey »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
phila_dot
|
|
« Reply #421 on: October 14, 2014, 10:27:49 AM »
|
|
|
I will have to check my xdf/file.
I know that I addressed this.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: October 14, 2014, 10:29:29 AM by phila_dot »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #422 on: October 14, 2014, 10:31:38 AM »
|
|
|
I will have to check my xdf/file.
I know that I addressed this.
Can you cross ref with the 5120 file posted by me? I'd like to know if i'm posting known bad images  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #423 on: October 14, 2014, 10:40:15 AM »
|
|
|
in BGRLP-BPSPMV there is a division by 2.0. Should this division constant (2.0) be rescaled? This would affect psp_w .
mov dpsmp_w_word_382038, r5
mov r7, r5
sub r7, dpsdvs_w_word_382036
jmpr cc_NV, loc_86BB58
mov r7, #8000h
subc r7, #0
loc_86BB58: ; CODE XREF: BGRLP+2DE
ashr r7, #1 ; division by 2
add r7, dpsfg_w_word_381E58
I'm not seeing this in 551M... is this for a different ecu? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
elRey
|
|
« Reply #424 on: October 14, 2014, 10:44:48 AM »
|
|
|
Yes, that's from the well documented TT file.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
phila_dot
|
|
« Reply #425 on: October 16, 2014, 08:25:40 PM »
|
|
|
What are you doing for the hard coded 10 hPa in LDRPID-MAIN for Hysteresis to set B_lddy ?
It's 8bit and hard coded #1. So, it can't be divided. Does that mean B_lddy is broken now? Or at least now considered 20 hPa (twice the left set value for Hysteresis)?
Not an issue in S4 M box. B_lddy is set if lde > 0 and less than UMDYLDR, clear otherwise. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
phila_dot
|
|
« Reply #426 on: October 16, 2014, 08:27:50 PM »
|
|
|
Can you cross ref with the 5120 file posted by me? I'd like to know if i'm posting known bad images I will check it out in the next few weeks. I ended up including everything, even if not applicable due to CW. For example, I have a TON of BKV stuff in there. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
elRey
|
|
« Reply #427 on: October 17, 2014, 10:20:17 AM »
|
|
|
My effort on 032HS file
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
elRey
|
|
« Reply #428 on: October 17, 2014, 08:07:05 PM »
|
|
|
Not an issue in S4 M box.
B_lddy is set if lde > 0 and less than UMDYLDR, clear otherwise.
Hmmm. I read the FR as b_lddy is set above UMDYLDR and cleared when lde falls below 10hPa. 10 vs 0 hPa I can see being different without deviating from FR. But B_lddy not being set above UMDYLDR on the M-box greatly differs from my FR understanding. But I've never looked at the mbox. I'm wondering if changing the 10hPa to 0 would be better than leaving it at the rescaled 20hPa, to be more like the mbox. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
phila_dot
|
|
« Reply #429 on: October 17, 2014, 09:17:31 PM »
|
|
|
The factor is 10, so 1h is 10hpa.
Yes, you are correct. I wrote that too quickly.
B_lddy is clear if lde <= 0 and set if lde > UMDYLDR.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Bische
|
|
« Reply #430 on: December 19, 2014, 03:54:09 PM »
|
|
|
What are you doing for the hard coded 10 hPa in LDRPID-MAIN for Hysteresis to set B_lddy ?
It's 8bit and hard coded #1. So, it can't be divided. Does that mean B_lddy is broken now? Or at least now considered 20 hPa (twice the left set value for Hysteresis)?
10 or 20 hpa hysteresis wont make a world difference for B_lddy, it is a ver small increase vs. what a sway in boost would make for performance. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
aef
|
|
« Reply #431 on: May 25, 2015, 07:55:50 AM »
|
|
|
I tried to implement this into my S3 AMK/BAM ecu but i endet up with a lumpy and little bit richer idle and rough gear change.
Attached you will find a log
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
automan001
Full Member
Karma: +47/-0
 Offline
Posts: 153
|
|
« Reply #432 on: May 27, 2015, 05:45:58 AM »
|
|
|
Thanks everybody for the info you shared! Using posts in this thread + FR + IDA + 3 sleepless nignts I've successfully converted my 1.8T 032HN1 box to 5 bar. First run at idle was impressive, I didn't expect much success from the first run. Night run on full load & full boost was amazing. Everything is under control. I observe no issues after conversion. Pressure sensor readings in logs were initially divided by 2, so I had to multiply by 2 corresponding me7log variables to compensate. From the logs I see that ps_w reading is correct, rl_w is also good and as expected, lamsoni_w shows proper numbers. It's cool to have more than 2.5 bar boost fully controllable. Increased my everyday boost to +1.65 bar & limited torque a little bit on 1-st and 2-nd gears, 3-rd gear now pulls very strong. But now with such pressure and +30C outside, my intake air is slightly hot (50-60C), so I will need to think about bigger intercooler.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: May 28, 2015, 02:49:38 AM by automan001 »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #433 on: July 15, 2015, 12:05:51 PM »
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
desch
Newbie
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 9
|
|
« Reply #434 on: August 03, 2015, 07:55:33 AM »
|
|
|
Which 3.0 bar sensor part number is best for working with the reference 5120 m-box bin? I only see 4.0 bar part numbers mentioned in this thread.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: August 03, 2015, 08:02:27 AM by desch »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
