I found another prior thread that also discussed the location of KFLBTS within the
8E0909518AK_368072_NEF_STG_1v7.xdf
http://nefariousmotorsports.com/forum/index.php?topic=12093.0I also checked about half dozen other (non 518AK) xdf and .bins, all of them have KFLBTS defined as a 16x12 table with axis of RPM x Relative Load. What I am seeing in the 8E0909518AK_368072_NEF_STG_1v7.xdf is that KFLBTS is defined as only a 16x8 table and the 8 values shown for relative load range from 0 to 5.25 instead of 12 to 140 in the "tylerW.xdf" at
http://nefariousmotorsports.com/forum/index.php?topic=15799.0 .
The RPM axis and the table LAMBDA values are identical for both 8E0909518AK_368072_NEF_STG_1v7.xdf and the tylerW.xdf however since the relative load axis is only defined as 8 rows instead of 12 rows, the LAMDA values for the last 4 rows (corresponding to relative loads of 120 to 140) are missing when KFLBTS is viewed using the 8E0909518AK_368072_NEF_STG_1v7.xdf definition.
I am not knowledgeable enough to weigh in on correctness of the odd/even starting location for the table but it appears that both xdf use the same 0x198EF starting location so that is not in question, it is just that 8E0909518AK_368072_NEF_STG_1v7.xdf uses a different (incorrect?) reference for the Relative Load axis?
PS- my prior post incorrectly typed .bin when I meant .xdf in several places, and I had also typo'ed xdf as dxf in several places. Stupid nooby errors that I've now revised and fixed on my original post.