Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12 13 ... 37
Author Topic: The 5120 hack - Running up to 5bar absolute pressure on ME7.x  (Read 296681 times)
zillarob
Full Member
***

Karma: +13/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 152


« Reply #150 on: February 07, 2013, 07:29:26 PM »

Holy badass boostage, Batman!
Got my vote for insta-Hero Member upgrade, lol!
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +604/-166
Offline Offline

Posts: 12234


WWW
« Reply #151 on: February 07, 2013, 09:48:18 PM »

if i could i would. bt is my hero
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide (READ FIRST)
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum checker/corrrector for ME7.x

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience.
britishturbo
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +14/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 306


« Reply #152 on: February 07, 2013, 10:12:53 PM »

Hi All by Hex comparing the code around the changes on the M box on the front page I think I've found the locations where the program code needs to be changed in an Opel Z20LET bin

Can anyone double check my work who is a bit more up to speed with ASM work.

I did find more than one possible location for a couple variables so I may have selected the wrong one, or this ECU infact has more functions that needs scaling.

So this is untested and I warn anyone who wants to use this file to double check it first.

If you can post the raw bin file I will take a look for you.
There are a lot more possible locations than changes needed...
Logged
Rabbid
Full Member
***

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 55


« Reply #153 on: February 08, 2013, 02:10:20 AM »

If you need it I can do later, but the project is an unmodified bin file. If you have WinOLS you'll be able to export the bin file.
Logged
Rabbid
Full Member
***

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 55


« Reply #154 on: February 08, 2013, 02:35:35 AM »

Here we go, file attached!

Here is what I believe the values to be:

50032 pvdk_w 1013 division #1
50696 pvdk_w 1013 division #2
50D7E fvpdkds 1013 division #1
50F42 fvpdkds 1013 division #2
5143E fho_w 1013 division
522E2 frhodkr_w 1013 division
« Last Edit: February 08, 2013, 02:40:37 AM by Rabbid » Logged
Rabbid
Full Member
***

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 55


« Reply #155 on: February 08, 2013, 04:10:25 PM »

I've run through the map today made all the changes I can from the text file on first page for my friends car.  He was running 25psi on open loop but it was never that smooth to be honest, so we've dropped him to 1 bar boost at the moment put all the put a 3 bar map sensor in scaled it and verified its reading the same as the 2.5 bar did. Reset all the LDRPID stuff and so on.

Tomorrow we're just gonna try this file with the 5120 stuff patched in and see what happens unless someone can before tomorrow verify my asm change locations and tells me they're wrong. My only fear is crashing the ECU but hopefully if it doesn't run right it won't crash and we can just revert back a file version pending further investigation.

While going through the text file and scaling maps I noticed the Me1.5.5 doesn't have quite a few of the maps, either missing from my map pack or not in the ECU I'm not sure.. My only other thing to think about is whether there is any other additional maps this ecu might have.



Logged
s5fourdoor
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +33/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 617


« Reply #156 on: February 08, 2013, 04:33:23 PM »

Just want to confirm here.  Bische, is the part number for your VW TDI 4-bar sensor:  03K906051   ?

Just want to be 100% here that we are talking about the exact same sensor for the 1.8t and 2.7t guys to swap over.
Logged
Bische
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +25/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 397



WWW
« Reply #157 on: February 09, 2013, 01:23:11 AM »

Just want to confirm here.  Bische, is the part number for your VW TDI 4-bar sensor:  03K906051   ?

Just want to be 100% here that we are talking about the exact same sensor for the 1.8t and 2.7t guys to swap over.

Yes, I got mine on darksidedevelopments.
Logged
julex
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +78/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 923


« Reply #158 on: February 09, 2013, 11:33:52 AM »

I confirm that's the part # albeit I am not using mine just yet. I did fit it though, it fits electrically. When ordering, make sure to get that grommet as well (extra few bucks) as that's what makes it fit our TBB hole.
Logged
s5fourdoor
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +33/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 617


« Reply #159 on: February 09, 2013, 09:22:07 PM »

038906051C is the 3-bar TDI sensor, available in the USA....
Logged
ddillenger
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +639/-21
Offline Offline

Posts: 5640


« Reply #160 on: February 09, 2013, 09:24:05 PM »

3bar absolute=29psi=stock sensor? Wouldn't you need a minimum of a 4 bar sensor to extend the range?
Logged

Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!

Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com

Email>PM
britishturbo
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +14/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 306


« Reply #161 on: February 09, 2013, 09:27:24 PM »

3bar absolute=29psi=stock sensor? Wouldn't you need a minimum of a 4 bar sensor to extend the range?

Stock is 2.5 bar = 22.5psi
Logged
ddillenger
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +639/-21
Offline Offline

Posts: 5640


« Reply #162 on: February 09, 2013, 09:30:59 PM »

Gotcha, wasn't quite sure  Grin

I guess 3 bar would be better than stock, but if you're already scaled to properly use a 5 bar it seems a waste of perfectly good headroom.

At the very least 4 bar, as I really doubt anyone running stock engine management would exceed that.

BTW-I credit this thread in bringing back a few long-absent members. I'm loving it.
Logged

Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!

Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com

Email>PM
britishturbo
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +14/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 306


« Reply #163 on: February 09, 2013, 09:33:00 PM »

Gotcha, wasn't quite sure  Grin

I guess 3 bar would be better than stock, but if you're already scaled to properly use a 5 bar it seems a waste of perfectly good headroom.

At the very least 4 bar, as I really doubt anyone running stock engine management would exceed that.

BTW-I credit this thread in bringing back a few long-absent members. I'm loving it.

Even with stock map its worth doing!
You get headroom for ps_w... which means no need to under scale maf!
Logged
marcellus
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +2/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 472


« Reply #164 on: February 09, 2013, 10:39:52 PM »

I guess the only thing that really bugs me about this is fact that the sensors everybody is using has to be ordered from overseas.  I really would like the option of if the MAP sensor failed, my car not being out of commission, or having to carry around a stock Map file on my laptop all the time just in case.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12 13 ... 37
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.026 seconds with 18 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.001s, 0q)