Pages: 1 [2] 3
Author Topic: Adjust KFLDIMX vs load for increasing boost  (Read 32425 times)
savages4
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +10/-5
Offline Offline

Posts: 251


« Reply #15 on: February 18, 2013, 02:56:58 PM »

So is it wise to increase the axis to support the higher levels over 1 bar of boost or usually unnecessary?
Logged
AARDQ
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +11/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 338


« Reply #16 on: February 18, 2013, 03:12:57 PM »

It's error (I think that's correct).  So 1,000 mbar of error, not 1,000 mbar boost.  So no, no need to change the axis.
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +604/-166
Offline Offline

Posts: 12235


WWW
« Reply #17 on: February 18, 2013, 03:15:49 PM »

Please, read up on PIDs Sad

All of those complicated maps are a part of ME7's gain scheduling of the PID

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gain_scheduling

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PID_controller

... since single values of P I and D aren't really sufficient..
« Last Edit: February 18, 2013, 03:19:35 PM by nyet » Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide (READ FIRST)
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum checker/corrrector for ME7.x

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience.
matchew
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +47/-22
Offline Offline

Posts: 503


« Reply #18 on: February 18, 2013, 03:47:55 PM »

the input to that map's axis is lde (ld error)

Which map?


Here's another nub question, why does the KFLDIMX map only go up to 1000 mbar, do we not have control of the duty cycles beyond this?

How does it only go up to 1000mbar?
Logged
s5fourdoor
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +33/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 617


« Reply #19 on: February 18, 2013, 03:52:30 PM »

Its the error of the Measured Target....  So if you wanted 23psi but you were getting 18psi that'd be a 5-psi error.  1000 mbar is 14.7 psi ERROR.
Logged
B234R
Full Member
***

Karma: +11/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 75


« Reply #20 on: February 18, 2013, 04:33:03 PM »

Maybe ME7.1 is different, but I doubt it.
At least on ME7.5 and MED9 the pressure input to KFLDIMX is relative target pressure (PLSOLR_W)

Why would it be "boost pressure error"?

EDIT:
Ok, quickly looked at a ME7.1.1 .dam File.
Axis is boost pressure, unit hPa, 0-2559.9609375
Not pressure error.
« Last Edit: February 18, 2013, 04:39:25 PM by B234R » Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +604/-166
Offline Offline

Posts: 12235


WWW
« Reply #21 on: February 18, 2013, 04:35:46 PM »

Maybe ME7.1 is different, but I doubt it.
At least on ME7.5 and MED9 the pressure input to KFLDIMX is relative target pressure (PLSOLR_W)

Why would it be "boost pressure error"?

I could be wrong about KFLDIMX, but the rest of the PID (and gain schedule) is driven by lde.

I'd have to look at the FR again.

If you are right, the 5120 hack would be one solution.
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide (READ FIRST)
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum checker/corrrector for ME7.x

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience.
B234R
Full Member
***

Karma: +11/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 75


« Reply #22 on: February 18, 2013, 04:45:07 PM »

I have looked at the ME7.5 and MED9 Funktionsrahmen.
Trust me, it is plsol_r.
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +604/-166
Offline Offline

Posts: 12235


WWW
« Reply #23 on: February 18, 2013, 05:47:12 PM »

I have looked at the ME7.5 and MED9 Funktionsrahmen.
Trust me, it is plsol_r.

Yes. You are right, I was wrong. It is plsol_r in ME7.1 as well.

Which is plsol (requested boost) - plgrus (basically ambient pressure). I don't know what CWPLGU.0 is in ME7.1 but I assume it is 1 since it has an ambient pressure sensor?

I have no idea how BGPLGU works so hopefully others can chime in here.
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide (READ FIRST)
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum checker/corrrector for ME7.x

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience.
phila_dot
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +172/-11
Offline Offline

Posts: 1709


« Reply #24 on: February 18, 2013, 07:21:27 PM »

plgrus_w is not as described in the FR.

plgrus_w is plgta output from KFVPLGU multiplied by pssol_w, then plsolr_w is plsol_w minus plgrus_w. This is all done in LDRPID.
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +604/-166
Offline Offline

Posts: 12235


WWW
« Reply #25 on: February 18, 2013, 07:27:02 PM »

phila: have you ever logged plgrus? How does it differ from pu_w? Is CWPLGU.0 1 or 0?
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide (READ FIRST)
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum checker/corrrector for ME7.x

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience.
phila_dot
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +172/-11
Offline Offline

Posts: 1709


« Reply #26 on: February 18, 2013, 07:46:31 PM »

phila: have you ever logged plgrus? How does it differ from pu_w? Is CWPLGU.0 1 or 0?

They are nearly identical.

CWPLGU is not considered.
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +604/-166
Offline Offline

Posts: 12235


WWW
« Reply #27 on: February 18, 2013, 10:42:38 PM »

They are nearly identical.

CWPLGU is not considered.

:/

Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide (READ FIRST)
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum checker/corrrector for ME7.x

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience.
phila_dot
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +172/-11
Offline Offline

Posts: 1709


« Reply #28 on: February 18, 2013, 11:19:52 PM »

:/



Yea...you can disregard that completely.

This is one of the few examples where the FR isn't even close in our application.
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +604/-166
Offline Offline

Posts: 12235


WWW
« Reply #29 on: February 18, 2013, 11:37:07 PM »

plgrus_w is not as described in the FR.

plgrus_w is plgta output from KFVPLGU multiplied by pssol_w, then plsolr_w is plsol_w minus plgrus_w. This is all done in LDRPID.

I don't get this. KFVPLGU seems to be all ones.

This would make plgrus_w basically the modeled pressure drop across the throttle plate (difference between plsol and pssol), not pu. (plsol = pssol / vpsspls)

What am i missing?
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide (READ FIRST)
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum checker/corrrector for ME7.x

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience.
Pages: 1 [2] 3
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.035 seconds with 17 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.001s, 0q)