|
dream3R
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: January 31, 2016, 11:17:37 PM »
|
|
|
lamfa?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Lost
|
|
« Reply #16 on: January 31, 2016, 11:19:18 PM »
|
|
|
Hi Mocke,
Your FKKVS is transposed and was missing the corner zero. Pulse width column has to be vertical on the left, and RPM has to be horizontal across the top. I have uploaded the correct format FKKVS file.
Thank you for taking your time. Am i logging wright values, the rest of files are OK? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pedrosousa
Full Member
Karma: +3/-0
 Offline
Posts: 75
|
|
« Reply #17 on: February 01, 2016, 01:05:47 AM »
|
|
|
Here's sunday tune...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
SB_GLI
|
|
« Reply #18 on: February 01, 2016, 07:13:36 AM »
|
|
|
Here's sunday tune...
MAF scaling correct? I've seen similar results when I've used incorrect MAF scaling. In my case, I thought I had 225tt MAF sensor from a WB, and it turned out I had one from a narrowband. Two different sensors, slightly different MAF scalings, resulting in a bumpy AFR. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pedrosousa
Full Member
Karma: +3/-0
Offline
Posts: 75
|
|
« Reply #19 on: February 01, 2016, 07:27:19 AM »
|
|
|
It's a narrowband to wideband conversion and the maf it's the nb... the file has the nb maf calibration...
The MAF readings with the wideband ecu and and wb maf data were very impressive.... but not realistic
But that flutuation was allways there....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
armageddon
|
|
« Reply #20 on: February 01, 2016, 08:35:36 AM »
|
|
|
Is this the correct way to log: set NOLRA to 7 and log nmot_w, te_w, fr_w ?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Lost
|
|
« Reply #21 on: February 01, 2016, 11:36:50 AM »
|
|
|
I was under impresson that we should log
tevfakge_w ;{} ; {Adressierung Kennfeld FKKVS mit effektiver Einspritzzeit vor Feinabgleich}
te_w ;{EffInjectionTime} ; {effektive Einspritzzeit (word)}
nmot_w ;{EngineSpeed} ; {Motordrehzahl}
NOLRA 7 or 6
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pedrosousa
Full Member
Karma: +3/-0
Offline
Posts: 75
|
|
« Reply #22 on: February 01, 2016, 12:47:16 PM »
|
|
|
I used NOLRA 6 and logged nmot, fr_w and te_w
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ddillenger
|
|
« Reply #23 on: February 01, 2016, 01:09:07 PM »
|
|
|
NOLRA=7
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!
Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com
Email>PM
|
|
|
pedrosousa
Full Member
Karma: +3/-0
Offline
Posts: 75
|
|
« Reply #24 on: February 01, 2016, 01:43:53 PM »
|
|
|
What's the difference between nolra 6 ou 7???
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
guitar24t
Full Member
Karma: +13/-0
Offline
Posts: 101
|
|
« Reply #25 on: February 01, 2016, 05:12:22 PM »
|
|
|
@Mocke,
You need to log tevfakge_w, nmot_w, and fr_w. If tevfakge_w is not available, use tevfa_w. The log I looked at had the correct variables in it.
@pedrosousa
NOLRA=7 is required, otherwise the idle trims will be compromised since the program will be adjusting the idle trims with LTFT idle enabled.
You must log tevfa_w or tevfakge_w. They are more accurate than te_w for this purpose.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
dream3R
|
|
« Reply #26 on: February 01, 2016, 09:55:29 PM »
|
|
|
What's the difference between nolra 6 ou 7???
it's all used for bit instructions iirc 00x6 = 0b110 0x7 = 111 (= 1 = true) |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TijnCU
Hero Member
Karma: +60/-4
Offline
Posts: 690
flying brick
|
|
« Reply #27 on: April 06, 2016, 11:09:52 AM »
|
|
|
I have tried to use this exe today, but it totally messes up the FKKVS map.
Now, I did 2 log runs logging the right variables but the outcome remains the same. Even if I use the sample csv's, the result looks like my own below. What's wrong? I used raw csv, parsed csv, different variables etc. Also tested on 2 laptops (first x64 win10 and later on x86 winxp)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #28 on: April 06, 2016, 11:11:33 AM »
|
|
|
Question: are you trying to fix fuel system non-linearity, or problems with MAF calibration?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TijnCU
Hero Member
Karma: +60/-4
Offline
Posts: 690
flying brick
|
|
« Reply #29 on: April 06, 2016, 12:21:09 PM »
|
|
|
The maf and mlhfm are stock (not for my engine, but corresponding) but on a large custom turbo inlet, and the fuel system is a custom return system on 550cc. I am trying to finetune the fueling department. I know you are sceptical about this type of tuning, and it is possible that my kfkhfm should be adressed too but without the exact stock (corresponding to the B5.5 A4) fueling or a flowbench tester its not really easy to realize. I did my best to get the maf reading stable, its on a large K&N with 40cm of straight 80mm tube between the maf and the filter:  |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: April 06, 2016, 12:25:36 PM by TijnCU »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
