nitrorocket
Full Member
Karma: +0/-4
 Offline
Posts: 52
|
 |
« Reply #360 on: October 11, 2015, 08:39:46 AM »
|
|
|
Have you tested this on me7.8 on porsche 996 turbo? I will try it eventually.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
slklite
Full Member
Karma: +0/-3
Offline
Posts: 75
|
|
« Reply #361 on: October 11, 2015, 09:11:45 AM »
|
|
|
Sorry forgot to add the files after checksum correction...
In order, first is yours stock with no checksum, second is checksum corrected by me7sum, and third is checksum corrected by Winols
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
gt-innovation
|
|
« Reply #362 on: October 13, 2015, 02:19:43 AM »
|
|
|
Sorry forgot to add the files after checksum correction...
In order, first is yours stock with no checksum, second is checksum corrected by me7sum, and third is checksum corrected by Winols
Yes the non-genuine ols does that when you place the code in certain areas... however the original does not. just use the checksum correction of your flashing tool or download the me7sum utility from this forum to correct it. there is a gui version me7correction.exe somewhere here. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
slklite
Full Member
Karma: +0/-3
Offline
Posts: 75
|
|
« Reply #363 on: October 13, 2015, 02:31:14 PM »
|
|
|
Yes the non-genuine ols does that when you place the code in certain areas... however the original does not.
just use the checksum correction of your flashing tool or download the me7sum utility from this forum to correct it.
there is a gui version me7correction.exe somewhere here.
Hello, thank you for the answer. Do you have one that is already checksummed, so I can compare with the ones I have ? The file you gave doesn't have the same LC function as the one available on the forum right ? It is longer, and doesn't start at the same place. This leads another question. How do you choose the offset for the function ? You just look for ff space ? I saw a post from nyet somewhere saying there might be some conflict with some rsa security ... The log from the script would really help, I think, pretty please, it won't hurt anyway ... I already got the GUI, because I only found when searching for me7sum, the "c" version ... Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ddillenger
|
|
« Reply #364 on: October 13, 2015, 06:58:14 PM »
|
|
|
Have you tested this on me7.8 on porsche 996 turbo? I will try it eventually.
996 ecus will have a totally different form of LC. tsrldyn and all. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!
Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com
Email>PM
|
|
|
|
gt-innovation
|
|
« Reply #365 on: October 14, 2015, 07:47:06 AM »
|
|
|
Hello, thank you for the answer. Do you have one that is already checksummed, so I can compare with the ones I have ?
The file you gave doesn't have the same LC function as the one available on the forum right ? It is longer, and doesn't start at the same place. This leads another question. How do you choose the offset for the function ? You just look for ff space ? I saw a post from nyet somewhere saying there might be some conflict with some rsa security ...
The log from the script would really help, I think, pretty please, it won't hurt anyway ...
I already got the GUI, because I only found when searching for me7sum, the "c" version ...
Thanks.
At first you should read again this and the other thread that has to do with lc..i am not posting the checksum file not because i am bored but because you did not understand the procedure you need to follow. This file is on my car right now and as i told you it works perfectly both lc ans nls. The one i posted has just a tmotlin compare on the start of the function.And all of this code comes from this forum. Free space is free space inside the file but the problems that comes with some new sw versions with the use of this code is another story and yes there is some kind of conflict using the code and those versions. Most of them are rsa equiped but this code has worked on also on some of them without problems. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
slklite
Full Member
Karma: +0/-3
Offline
Posts: 75
|
|
« Reply #366 on: October 16, 2015, 12:58:56 PM »
|
|
|
Thank you for taking the time to answer me. I'm sorry but I don't understand what you mean, by the fact that I didn't understand the procedure.
I read this post many times. I think I'm doint it right. Could you please tell me what you think I'm doing wrong ?
Well, as for the variables offsets. I found that they are in the .ecu file
The problem is with hte wped. If I use the offset from my .ecu file (0.392157), I get 16554,52 %
If I use Winols's % factor (0.002369), I get 100,00 %
Something, is, wrong right ?
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
slklite
Full Member
Karma: +0/-3
Offline
Posts: 75
|
|
« Reply #367 on: October 17, 2015, 06:35:33 AM »
|
|
|
Sorry, my bad for the wped offset. I was in 16 bits, when it should be in 8 bits
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
b4A4nowA6
Full Member
Karma: +1/-4
Offline
Posts: 117
|
|
« Reply #368 on: October 20, 2015, 10:03:59 AM »
|
|
|
Before I get started,
Has anyone confirmed if this will work on ME7.1.1 "551s"? I would love to have this function for my A6.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
vwnut8392
|
|
« Reply #369 on: October 25, 2015, 01:12:21 AM »
|
|
|
Tried the auto add EXE on 06A906032C 512kb file for a 2000 1.8T new beetle and the LC wont work. used the EXE on plenty of different 1mb files and it always works without a hitch. figured i'd share my findings and see if there was a solution to the 512mb files because the EXE always says it patched fine. i attached a stock file with LC/NLS patch and the .ecu file i generated with ME7info.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
gt-innovation
|
|
« Reply #370 on: October 25, 2015, 04:53:36 AM »
|
|
|
Tried the auto add EXE on 06A906032C 512kb file for a 2000 1.8T new beetle and the LC wont work. used the EXE on plenty of different 1mb files and it always works without a hitch. figured i'd share my findings and see if there was a solution to the 512mb files because the EXE always says it patched fine. i attached a stock file with LC/NLS patch and the .ecu file i generated with ME7info.
I assume that you already checked your clutch switch.. right? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
vwnut8392
|
|
« Reply #371 on: October 25, 2015, 10:07:01 AM »
|
|
|
I assume that you already checked your clutch switch.. right?
yes i tested it in vag com and it does respond. measuring block 066 if i reacall correctly. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
vwnut8392
|
|
« Reply #372 on: October 25, 2015, 10:14:16 AM »
|
|
|
so i started looking at the routine in IDA to try and understand it and why does it start with ram variable coolant temp? here's a screen grab of what the routine looks like. i was looking at the 1mb file and it start with b_kuppl?
EDIT
it looks like the first block needs to be removed from the routine. its comparing the coolant temp to the last 2 bits of the pedal position. after the first block is the clutch switch routine than it follows as it should. so im going to remove the first chunk and correct the checksum and see what happens.
Also it looks like to me that this little mistake could be used to add the option to disable the LC/NLS till a pre set coolant temperature is achieved to prevent engine damage so idiots arent doing it while the engine is cold. basically my idea would be to add another variable for coolant temp after 0x17998 pedal position and direct the ram comparison to that before it jumps to the clutch pedal. its just an idea, if i can figure out how to add the new variable at 0x1799A for coolant temp and make the first code chunk in the patch direct there i think it could be a decent working engine safety feature.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: October 25, 2015, 01:37:05 PM by vwnut8392 »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
vwnut8392
|
|
« Reply #373 on: October 25, 2015, 02:05:51 PM »
|
|
|
well i tried my modification and it sort of works on the launch control anyhow. you can hear the car start cutting ignition at 4500rpm but it still pushes through to the limiter pretty much. not sure what i have to do to correct it and make it work properly at this point so any help would be great. i attached the BIN file i modified too, its a stock BIN that was patched originally with launch.exe and than i removed the first block of code and shifted everything up to where the original code started. Here's the original C2 F4 5C 8B D7 00 81 00 C2 F9 99 79 40 49 FD 40 9A 1F 13 B0 F2 F4 88 8D D7 00 81 00 F2 F9 90 79 40 49 9D 0B F2 F4 7E F8 D7 00 81 00 F2 F9 92 79 40 49 FD 03 F7 8E 08 8D 0D 2F 9A 1F 29 B0 8A 1F 22 70 F2 F4 7E F8 D7 00 81 00 F2 F9 96 79 40 49 FD 1A C2 F4 C8 8A D7 00 81 00 C2 F9 98 79 40 49 FD 12 D7 00 38 00 F2 F4 F0 4F D7 00 81 00 F2 F9 94 79 40 49 9D 11 F7 8E 08 8D 08 41 D7 00 38 00 F7 F8 F0 4F 0D 09 D7 00 38 00 F6 8F F0 4F 0D 04 D7 00 38 00 F6 8E F0 4F F3 F8 BD 8A DB 00 Here's what i did 9A 1F 13 B0 F2 F4 88 8D D7 00 81 00 F2 F9 90 79 40 49 9D 0B F2 F4 7E F8 D7 00 81 00 F2 F9 92 79 40 49 FD 03 F7 8E 08 8D 0D 2F 9A 1F 29 B0 8A 1F 22 70 F2 F4 7E F8 D7 00 81 00 F2 F9 96 79 40 49 FD 1A C2 F4 C8 8A D7 00 81 00 C2 F9 98 79 40 49 FD 12 D7 00 38 00 F2 F4 F0 4F D7 00 81 00 F2 F9 94 79 40 49 9D 11 F7 8E 08 8D 08 41 D7 00 38 00 F7 F8 F0 4F 0D 09 D7 00 38 00 F6 8F F0 4F 0D 04 D7 00 38 00 F6 8E F0 4F F3 F8 BD 8A DB 00 |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
hopsis
Full Member
Karma: +13/-4
Offline
Posts: 174
|
|
« Reply #374 on: October 25, 2015, 10:34:33 PM »
|
|
|
Looks like your FTOMN is 00. Have You tried 01?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
