Pages: [1]
Author Topic: getting rid of "warm up catalyst below efficiency"  (Read 8115 times)
digitalhippie
Full Member
***

Karma: +0/-5
Offline Offline

Posts: 111


« on: September 03, 2014, 08:19:16 AM »

So I have this code on my 2001 Allroad 2.7T (551L base file):

16815 - Warm Up Catalyst; Bank 2
            P0431 - 35-00 - Efficiency Below Threshold

Reading the S4 tuning wiki, it says you can numb the sensitivity and possibly get rid of the code using the following -
AHKATMN (0x18672)
AHKATMX (0x18673)
AHKATS (0x18674)

But not much is said about how to change these values.  I'm assuming these are 8bit scalars (since they are not defined in my XDF), does anyone know the conversion factor?  Should I be adjusting these values up or down to reduce sensitivity?  What's a good increment to adjust them in?
« Last Edit: September 03, 2014, 08:21:52 AM by digitalhippie » Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +604/-166
Offline Offline

Posts: 12235


WWW
« Reply #1 on: September 03, 2014, 08:50:30 AM »

You can always look at one of the fully defined defs (551G, 551F etc.) for this information:

http://files.s4wiki.com/defs/
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide (READ FIRST)
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum checker/corrrector for ME7.x

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience.
digitalhippie
Full Member
***

Karma: +0/-5
Offline Offline

Posts: 111


« Reply #2 on: September 03, 2014, 09:08:02 AM »

Ok, that answers half of the question.  Thanks.  I didn't realize the addresses would be the same for those files.

Any suggestions on how to adjust these values?  Up, down?  Suggested increments?
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +604/-166
Offline Offline

Posts: 12235


WWW
« Reply #3 on: September 03, 2014, 09:11:43 AM »

Ok, that answers half of the question.  Thanks.  I didn't realize the addresses would be the same for those files.

Not the addresses, those change. But the factor (and scalar bitwidth, etc.) is usually the same.

Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide (READ FIRST)
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum checker/corrrector for ME7.x

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience.
digitalhippie
Full Member
***

Karma: +0/-5
Offline Offline

Posts: 111


« Reply #4 on: September 03, 2014, 09:33:17 AM »

Gotcha, thank you
Logged
digitalhippie
Full Member
***

Karma: +0/-5
Offline Offline

Posts: 111


« Reply #5 on: September 03, 2014, 10:40:04 AM »

I went ahead and cut the values in half... we'll see how that works
Logged
ddillenger
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +639/-21
Offline Offline

Posts: 5640


« Reply #6 on: September 03, 2014, 11:21:36 AM »

You went the wrong way.
Logged

Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!

Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com

Email>PM
digitalhippie
Full Member
***

Karma: +0/-5
Offline Offline

Posts: 111


« Reply #7 on: September 03, 2014, 11:22:28 AM »

Dammit, figures... any suggested values to use?
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +604/-166
Offline Offline

Posts: 12235


WWW
« Reply #8 on: September 03, 2014, 11:24:10 AM »

Wouldn't it make sense to decrease MIN but increase MAX?

Disclaimer: I have not adjusted any of these parameters in my file.
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide (READ FIRST)
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum checker/corrrector for ME7.x

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience.
digitalhippie
Full Member
***

Karma: +0/-5
Offline Offline

Posts: 111


« Reply #9 on: September 03, 2014, 11:27:53 AM »

If MN is min and MX is max...
What are S and SB?
Logged
ddillenger
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +639/-21
Offline Offline

Posts: 5640


« Reply #10 on: September 03, 2014, 11:31:46 AM »

If MN is min and MX is max...
What are S and SB?

The sums of each sensor in a stereo system.

MX, S, SB=FF

I have never lowered MN.
Logged

Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!

Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com

Email>PM
digitalhippie
Full Member
***

Karma: +0/-5
Offline Offline

Posts: 111


« Reply #11 on: September 03, 2014, 11:33:30 AM »

Ok, then I'll max out MX, S, SB

Thanks for your help, again.  Sorry I'm such a newb to this.
Logged
ddillenger
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +639/-21
Offline Offline

Posts: 5640


« Reply #12 on: September 03, 2014, 11:37:40 AM »

I suggest reading the FR. My info is my interpretation. It might not always be correct.
Logged

Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!

Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com

Email>PM
digitalhippie
Full Member
***

Karma: +0/-5
Offline Offline

Posts: 111


« Reply #13 on: September 03, 2014, 11:38:56 AM »

I definitely want to dig deeper and learn as much as I can, but right now it's just about getting the car running decent.
Logged
digitalhippie
Full Member
***

Karma: +0/-5
Offline Offline

Posts: 111


« Reply #14 on: September 05, 2014, 12:24:43 PM »

Looks like that worked... warm-up cat code has not returned.
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.02 seconds with 16 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.001s, 0q)