Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Am I'm wrong ? KFMIRL / IOP ..  (Read 3978 times)
titi65
Jr. Member
**

Karma: +1/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 43


« on: January 06, 2014, 08:53:22 AM »

Hi,

I'm currently tuning my Peugeot ME7 for E85.
I've a 3.0i, 6 cylinders, naturaly aspired.

It's progressing, slowly, but carefully.

I'm looking for some "professional tuner", and something seem wrong with my understanding of KFMIRL, or the pro:
for me:
KFMIRL is a map with the relative load (rl) necessary (at lambda 1, optimal ignition angle), to get the relative torque request satisfied.
KFMIOP is the inverse, relative tq request that should result of the specified rl.

If I'm correct, why touch theses maps on an aspired engine where there is visibly a lot of reserve ?

And if I'm right, it's falsing the torque model, specificly for ESP/Gearbox/kluch ?

I hope my english is understandable...

Thanks for your lights.
Logged
terminator
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +15/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 425


« Reply #1 on: January 06, 2014, 04:36:23 PM »

I dont think you should change it on non turbo engine.
Logged
titi65
Jr. Member
**

Karma: +1/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 43


« Reply #2 on: January 07, 2014, 02:04:58 AM »

I'm thinking same.

Here is my stock:
Logged
terminator
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +15/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 425


« Reply #3 on: January 07, 2014, 07:58:40 AM »

KFMIRL should be inverse of KFMIOP, so I think its better to use stock maps.
Logged
titi65
Jr. Member
**

Karma: +1/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 43


« Reply #4 on: January 07, 2014, 08:00:31 AM »

I know this, but I wonder why lot of remappers are modifying them...(on aspirated engine).
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.015 seconds with 16 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0s, 0q)