Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5
Author Topic: MAF G/S at idle poll: Blow through MAF discussion.  (Read 47826 times)
Snow Trooper
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +89/-24
Offline Offline

Posts: 689


WWW
« on: September 09, 2011, 12:35:52 PM »

What do you see at idle?  I always see 3.5-5.5 it seems...  this is the same with bone stock cars.  Regardless of MAF housing diameter or placement.  every car i log here at 6000ft reads this at idle.

As I have been testing various MAF setups on my single car in both draw through and blow through I have been seeing a lot of weird things.

First and foremost, how is it possible that with the same map values I could have a 73mm housing read the same as a 88mm (1.47 times more area)?

I recently switched back to blow through again as i never really got into fine tuning it.  A 73mm is reading LOWER post turbo than a 88mm was pre turbo, same car, same conditions, same boost levels.  At 15 psi and4000rpm it was reading 120gs (4.63 G/S @ idle).  The 88mm reads 160 pre-turbo at the same point (4.63 G/S @ idle).  Stock MLHFM and a KFKHFM of all 1s to remove further variables.  How is it the same at idle yet lower at high flow, yet a smaller housing?  I get that the air is now compressed and heated, but it is still the same volume of air.

Every shred of info i have read about blow through says that the readings will be skewed HIGHER.  This is the opposite of what is happening to my car. 

Next observation is that if I scale the MAF voltage table (MLHFM) at all, even 1%+ it will read 9-17 G/S and be creating 40-50% engine load at idle with AFRs in the 10s.

Today i am going to try two things, first a maf scale that progresses from 0.01% to 15% positive of the stock map across the 512 points and then also a standard upscale of the map with KFKHFM changes to just low loads and idle.

I know very few people are doing anything blow through on the cars, but if I am not somehow screwing things up, this could open up a lot of options.  Imagine a stock housing that you can run more air through than a 90mm and still have resolution.

thoughts?  anyone know the answers to these events already?
Logged

cartoons?
6A 61 72 65 64 40 76 6C 6D 73 70 65 63
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +604/-166
Offline Offline

Posts: 12234


WWW
« Reply #1 on: September 09, 2011, 12:55:23 PM »

I'm guessing that at idle, the MAF is at its minimum value, and you are seeing a fixed additive offset. I recall seeing something like in the FR,  but I dont recall the details. I'll look it up time permitting.
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide (READ FIRST)
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum checker/corrrector for ME7.x

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience.
Snow Trooper
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +89/-24
Offline Offline

Posts: 689


WWW
« Reply #2 on: September 09, 2011, 01:13:20 PM »

thats what I was thinking to.  like the 4.5ish G/S i see is just locked in as an assumption because the air flow is so low?
Logged

cartoons?
6A 61 72 65 64 40 76 6C 6D 73 70 65 63
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +604/-166
Offline Offline

Posts: 12234


WWW
« Reply #3 on: September 09, 2011, 01:13:23 PM »

I take it back. I was thinking of MLOFS, which is zero for hitachi mafs. There is some other sort of fixed offset hidden somewhere, but I can't find it now.
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide (READ FIRST)
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum checker/corrrector for ME7.x

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience.
Snow Trooper
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +89/-24
Offline Offline

Posts: 689


WWW
« Reply #4 on: September 09, 2011, 01:31:44 PM »

btw, this is all the same regardless of hitachi or bosch so far in my testing.

I still keep going back to the bosch sensor though.  that is what I am currently on, stock 73mm housing with stretched 3" hoses within my 3" charge piping.
« Last Edit: September 09, 2011, 02:12:28 PM by Snow Trooper » Logged

cartoons?
6A 61 72 65 64 40 76 6C 6D 73 70 65 63
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +604/-166
Offline Offline

Posts: 12234


WWW
« Reply #5 on: September 09, 2011, 01:38:37 PM »

Also, try logging MAF voltage directly. uhfm_w in setzi's logger.
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide (READ FIRST)
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum checker/corrrector for ME7.x

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience.
NOTORIOUS VR
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +58/-7
Offline Offline

Posts: 1056


« Reply #6 on: September 09, 2011, 02:09:31 PM »

I was under the impression that a blow through setup would read lower?  Not quite up to speed on these setups though.

Either way I can't wait to change over to the HPX sensor
Logged

SCHNELL ENGINEERING BLOG ·  STANDALONE ECUS · TUNING · DYNO · WIRING · PARTS · VEMS
Google Talk: NOTORIOUS.VR
n00bs start here: http://s4wiki.com/wiki/Tuning
s5fourdoor
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +33/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 617


« Reply #7 on: September 09, 2011, 02:14:16 PM »

jared - can you step back a second.  did you just say you are running your single-turbo beast on a 73mm MAF setup and it runs fine?  if so, why are we all bothering to do anything to the maf setups?  what did i miss in your comment? (lol...)
Logged
Snow Trooper
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +89/-24
Offline Offline

Posts: 689


WWW
« Reply #8 on: September 09, 2011, 02:45:33 PM »

Best its ever ran!  Pardon the haggard ass looking piping, I have yet to decide my final configuration as you can tell by all this testing.  Once everything is done the intake will be a one piece CF tube and the charge will all be thin wall tig-ed stainless like my first section there.

post turbo, post BOV, pre inter-cooler.  It seems to have head room to over 800CHP.  I exploded a stock housing (my original stock one from 2000) at 35psi on e85 Grin

fyi, twin turbo guys can run two tdi maf housings with a stock sensor and put a 2.25 ohm resistor in their clips, shared wiring like on a touareg and like that you can be blow through for testing/running bovs, dual intake, whatever... Wink

with all that said, I am obviously still figuring out some of the nuances of this.  blow through MAFs on other platforms obviously do different things.  all their info has to just be taken as info, not facts regarding our ECUs and even sensors themselves so please approach this with caution.  When I first put it to blow through it was going lean at boost onset until I cleaned up other areas of my tune.







Logged

cartoons?
6A 61 72 65 64 40 76 6C 6D 73 70 65 63
s5fourdoor
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +33/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 617


« Reply #9 on: September 09, 2011, 05:21:37 PM »

ok, so forgive my speculation here, but what you've said here would directly imply we do not require larger maf's nor maf scaling...  there's been a ton of discussion about this and frankly it seems like a lot of hot-air and wasted time...     nyet: any thoughts?
Logged
Giannis
Full Member
***

Karma: +11/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 176


« Reply #10 on: September 10, 2011, 12:19:38 AM »

i've compered 2 different diameter maf housings one from bosch 70mm maf (1.8t 180ps) and the other from 80mm bosch maf (1.8t 225ps). It seams that the scaling is not linear. In lower voltages the bigger housing reads less than the smaler about 8% and in higher it keeps readind more and more increasing up to +25%. I have attached some pictures. The first one is the % difference between the 2 and the second the 2 different callibrations. These are oem values taken from original files. Also i think there is an offset MLOFS (200kg/h) in the damos that i have.
« Last Edit: September 10, 2011, 12:26:06 AM by Giannis » Logged
Snow Trooper
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +89/-24
Offline Offline

Posts: 689


WWW
« Reply #11 on: September 13, 2011, 02:34:54 PM »

Ran a test for everyone, went stock for stock and took a stock m-box file, modified as few maps as possible to make it even run on my car.  Results are the same.  A housing reads lower post turbo than pre, significantly lower.  Also I can confirm it reads 60-70 G/S lower across the range than a un-scaled 90mm that is pre turbo.  I wanted to make sure that no other areas of my highly changed files were causing this.

I couldnt test this at anything above 18 psi though as with the minimal maps changed I was going crazy lean.  At 18 psi it pegged readings at 137 G/S and my AFRs were in the 16-17 range according to my wideband guage.  I obviously had to shut down.  I didnt get any really clean logs of the behavior but I feel I have backed it up now on my car atleast buy taking a totally different file and tuning strategy and getting the same results.
Logged

cartoons?
6A 61 72 65 64 40 76 6C 6D 73 70 65 63
s5fourdoor
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +33/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 617


« Reply #12 on: September 13, 2011, 10:10:57 PM »

hey - so have you tried the stock/stock pull-through as-in basically bone stock?

Logged
TTQS
Guest
« Reply #13 on: September 13, 2011, 11:24:44 PM »

What do you see at idle?  I always see 3.5-5.5 it seems...  this is the same with bone stock cars.  Regardless of MAF housing diameter or placement.  every car i log here at 6000ft reads this at idle.

I'm guessing that at idle, the MAF is at its minimum value, and you are seeing a fixed additive offset. I recall seeing something like in the FR,  but I dont recall the details. I'll look it up time permitting.

"During idle conditions, a selection is made between the measured air mass flow and the maximum possible air mass flow at this operating point, mldmx_w (taken at a height of -500 m and a temperature of -40°C) weighted by the multiplication factor FKMSHFM".

Doug
Logged
Tony@NefMoto
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +130/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 1389


2001.5 Audi S4 Stage 3


« Reply #14 on: September 14, 2011, 02:57:39 PM »

You should also check KFMLDMN and FWMLHFMMN.
Logged

Remember you have to log in if you want to see the file attachments!
Info or questions, please add to the wiki: http://www.nefariousmotorsports.com/wiki
Follow NefMoto developments on Twitter: http://twitter.com/nefmoto
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.024 seconds with 16 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0s, 0q)