|
Title: Need help to correct LAMFA axis. Post by: AndrewS on May 03, 2016, 02:14:04 AM Hello?
I'm starting remap my TT180 with LAMFA Map but my definition file seems strange. X-Axis values are (0, 160.3648, 40.0789, 120.6730, 88.6575, 0.3815) So I've changed Axis Values 16Bit(LoHi) to 16Bit(HiLo). (0, 50.6296, 59.5354, 90.3209, 94.8836, 97.6640) I don't know 16Bit(HiLo) is right. and I'm not sure LAMFA,Axis address are fine... My X Axis is right? Please check attached files and give me your opinion. Thanks! Title: Re: Need help to correct LAMFA axis. Post by: adam- on May 03, 2016, 03:25:38 AM Where did you get the definition file from?
Title: Re: Need help to correct LAMFA axis. Post by: AndrewS on May 03, 2016, 04:02:23 AM I got the definition file from here
http://nefariousmotorsports.com/forum/index.php?topic=6474.0 Title: Re: Need help to correct LAMFA axis. Post by: MarkS4 on May 03, 2016, 06:56:32 AM This is correct layout:
Map Name:Lambda Fahrerwunsch Map ID:LAMFA Start Address: 1C98A Cols/Rows: 6x15 Values: 8 Bit Unsigned Factor: 0.0078125 Offset: 0 Unit: Lambda X Axis: Start Address:1C97E Values: 16Bit LH Unsigned Factor: 0.003051757813 Offset: 0 Unit: % Y Axis: Start Address:1C96E Values: 8Bit Unsigned Factor: 40.0 Offset: 0 Unit: nmot Title: Re: Need help to correct LAMFA axis. Post by: AndrewS on May 03, 2016, 07:35:27 AM Thank you for information MarkS4.
I appling your correction to my project file. I have one more question. In the S4 wiki, "LAMFA torque axis is restricted to 0.5%~1.0%" But my torque axis(I attached img) described (50 60 89.99 95.00 98.00 100). Why these are different? Can I believe the correction LAMFA(I attached img) is right? S4wiki LAMFA - requested lambda. Not very flexible for high load enrichment, uses requested torque instead of actual torque. Also, the stock LAMFA torque axis is (incorrectly) restricted to 0.5%-1.0% on 2.7t ECUs. You will have to change it to full range (multiply each value by 100 to result in 50%-100%) to use LAMFA, otherwise, the 1% column will be used at ALL requested torque points![16] Thank you ! Title: Re: Need help to correct LAMFA axis. Post by: adam- on May 03, 2016, 07:48:42 AM But my torque axis(I attached img) described (50 60 89.99 95.00 98.00 100). Also, the stock LAMFA torque axis is (incorrectly) restricted to 0.5%-1.0% on 2.7t ECUs. You will have to change it to full range (multiply each value by 100 to result in 50%-100%) to use LAMFA, otherwise, the 1% column will be used at ALL requested torque points![16] You're not tuning a 2.7. :) Your axis is correct. Title: Re: Need help to correct LAMFA axis. Post by: MarkS4 on May 03, 2016, 09:50:37 AM 2.7 Ecu has incorrect values for axis from factory, because the map is all values of 1.00, it doesn't matter.
When you want to use the map, we would change the axis values to give proper resolution across the range (ME7.1 Only). Use the values I gave you and you will be fine. Title: Re: Need help to correct LAMFA axis. Post by: AndrewS on May 03, 2016, 06:22:05 PM I understand ;D
Thank you Mark and adam. Title: Re: Need help to correct LAMFA axis. Post by: sonique on May 03, 2016, 06:31:13 PM 50-100% not correct 0- 98 or 100 correct
because first value reading idle https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcxnyBoS9Ek (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcxnyBoS9Ek) Title: Re: Need help to correct LAMFA axis. Post by: AndrewS on May 03, 2016, 10:32:51 PM 50-100% not correct 0- 98 or 100 correct Hello sonique?because first value reading idle https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcxnyBoS9Ek (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcxnyBoS9Ek) You mean my original data with changed Axis Values 16Bit(LoHi) to 16Bit(HiLo). (0, 50.6296, 59.5354, 90.3209, 94.8836, 97.6640) is right? You said "0" means idle data. according to your opinion idle Lamda is little rich (under 1). Is this right? thank you Title: Re: Need help to correct LAMFA axis. Post by: bobbyz0r on May 08, 2016, 05:16:48 PM Hello sonique? You mean my original data with changed Axis Values 16Bit(LoHi) to 16Bit(HiLo). (0, 50.6296, 59.5354, 90.3209, 94.8836, 97.6640) is right? You said "0" means idle data. according to your opinion idle Lamda is little rich (under 1). Is this right? thank you In map properties, set it from Two-dimension to 2D Inverse. |