Title: Best AFR for Perfomance vs. Economy Post by: Gonzo on October 02, 2011, 12:31:39 PM I think this info will help out a lot of people.
(http://i.imgur.com/ZUbak.jpg) Lambda E85 AFR Gas AFR 0.500 4.880 7.350 0.510 4.978 7.497 0.520 5.075 7.644 0.530 5.173 7.791 0.540 5.270 7.938 0.550 5.368 8.085 0.560 5.466 8.232 0.570 5.563 8.379 0.580 5.661 8.526 0.590 5.758 8.673 0.600 5.856 8.820 0.610 5.954 8.967 0.620 6.051 9.114 0.630 6.149 9.261 0.640 6.246 9.408 0.650 6.344 9.555 0.660 6.442 9.702 0.670 6.539 9.849 0.680 6.637 9.996 0.690 6.734 10.143 0.700 6.832 10.290 0.710 6.930 10.437 0.720 7.027 10.584 0.730 7.125 10.731 0.740 7.222 10.878 0.750 7.320 11.025 0.760 7.418 11.172 0.770 7.515 11.319 0.780 7.613 11.466 0.790 7.710 11.613 0.800 7.808 11.760 0.810 7.906 11.907 0.820 8.003 12.054 0.830 8.101 12.201 0.840 8.198 12.348 0.850 8.296 12.495 0.860 8.394 12.642 0.870 8.491 12.789 0.880 8.589 12.936 0.890 8.686 13.083 0.900 8.784 13.230 0.910 8.882 13.377 0.920 8.979 13.524 0.930 9.077 13.671 0.940 9.174 13.818 0.950 9.272 13.965 0.960 9.370 14.112 0.970 9.467 14.259 0.980 9.565 14.406 0.990 9.662 14.553 1.000 9.760 14.700 1.010 9.858 14.847 1.020 9.955 14.994 1.030 10.053 15.141 1.040 10.150 15.288 1.050 10.248 15.435 1.060 10.346 15.582 1.070 10.443 15.729 1.080 10.541 15.876 1.090 10.638 16.023 1.100 10.736 16.170 1.110 10.834 16.317 1.120 10.931 16.464 1.130 11.029 16.611 1.140 11.126 16.758 1.150 11.224 16.905 1.160 11.322 17.052 1.170 11.419 17.199 1.180 11.517 17.346 1.190 11.614 17.493 1.200 11.712 17.640 1.210 11.810 17.787 1.220 11.907 17.934 1.230 12.005 18.081 1.240 12.102 18.228 1.250 12.200 18.375 1.260 12.298 18.522 1.270 12.395 18.669 1.280 12.493 18.816 1.290 12.590 18.963 1.300 12.688 19.110 1.310 12.786 19.257 1.320 12.883 19.404 1.330 12.981 19.551 1.340 13.078 19.698 1.350 13.176 19.845 1.360 13.274 19.992 1.370 13.371 20.139 1.380 13.469 20.286 1.390 13.566 20.433 1.400 13.664 20.580 1.410 13.762 20.727 1.420 13.859 20.874 1.430 13.957 21.021 1.440 14.054 21.168 1.450 14.152 21.315 1.460 14.250 21.462 1.470 14.347 21.609 1.480 14.445 21.756 1.490 14.542 21.903 1.500 14.640 22.050 ;) Title: Re: Best AFR for Perfomance vs. Economy Post by: TTQS on October 03, 2011, 01:45:23 AM Page 15 of Engine Management Advanced Tuning by Greg Banish has a similar diagram. He quotes AFR of between 13.2 and 13.4:1 (lambda approx. 0.95) is ideal for best power. Similarly, he quotes AFR of about 15.5:1 (lambda approx. 1.05) for best economy.
Doug Title: Re: Best AFR for Perfomance vs. Economy Post by: Rick on October 03, 2011, 06:19:12 AM Unfortunately,
a lot of that goes out of the window on knock limited turbo cars! Title: Re: Best AFR for Perfomance vs. Economy Post by: Snow Trooper on October 03, 2011, 11:01:25 AM That's for NA cars.
For Audi 5v stuff you want 11.6-12.4 under load and 14.7-15.5 at cruise depending on economy desired. 16 - 17 is too lean. Title: Re: Best AFR for Perfomance vs. Economy Post by: s5fourdoor on October 03, 2011, 02:16:11 PM what afr do you want on decel? i've been seeing wideband afr values of 22+ on high rpm decel...
what tables would we need correcting to fix decel afr? Title: Re: Best AFR for Perfomance vs. Economy Post by: Rick on October 03, 2011, 02:29:17 PM thats because of the fuel cut
Title: Re: Best AFR for Perfomance vs. Economy Post by: nyet on October 03, 2011, 03:34:01 PM Unfortunately, a lot of that goes out of the window on knock limited turbo cars! Rick: agreed. I'm finding 11.5 to 12 is appropriate for pump gas (91/93oct, US) On race gas, what do you think is optimal? Title: Re: Best AFR for Perfomance vs. Economy Post by: Gonzo on October 03, 2011, 05:55:27 PM That's for NA cars. Yes this is for NA. For turbo under boost you want to run 12. Any richer is just a waste.For Audi 5v stuff you want 11.6-12.4 under load and 14.7-15.5 at cruise depending on economy desired. 16 - 17 is too lean. I run 1.1156 on my (non-boosted) 12v (16.4) for part throttle. Add timing to make up for lack of power while running lean on part throttle ;) I thought that second chart was a nice addition since its a nice way to convert AFR to Lambda and vice versa. Title: Re: Best AFR for Perfomance vs. Economy Post by: nyet on October 03, 2011, 06:34:38 PM For turbo under boost you want to run 12. Any richer is just a waste. On 91oct, I find richer than 12 gives me a bit more timing and a lot less knock, especially with high IATs. YMMV. Title: Re: Best AFR for Perfomance vs. Economy Post by: Gonzo on October 03, 2011, 06:52:48 PM For turbo under boost you want to run 12. Any richer is just a waste. On 91oct, I find richer than 12 gives me a bit more timing and a lot less knock, especially with high IATs. YMMV. You can go a lil richer. Depends on gas and other factors like IAT, etc. Edit: 99.9% of all my tuning work revolves around 1.8T. 2.7T might like to be a little richer. Title: Re: Best AFR for Perfomance vs. Economy Post by: s5fourdoor on October 03, 2011, 11:25:26 PM thats because of the fuel cut Could you possibly explain this more or give me an idea of where to read about it? Thanks Rick! Title: Re: Best AFR for Perfomance vs. Economy Post by: nyet on October 04, 2011, 12:01:22 AM injectors and spark turns off on decel.
Title: Re: Best AFR for Perfomance vs. Economy Post by: NOTORIOUS VR on October 04, 2011, 05:48:09 AM Yes this is for NA. For turbo under boost you want to run 12. Any richer is just a waste. I run 1.1156 on my (non-boosted) 12v (16.4) for part throttle. Add timing to make up for lack of power while running lean on part throttle ;) you're assuming every engine is the same.. it's not... Also you're making very general statements... the more boost you run the more chance of knock, the more fuel you will need to run to cool the charge and keep knock to a minimum... the problem is you get to a point where combustion suffers when going too rich (usually lower then 11.3 or so) and you actually start to misfire from too much fuel. 16.4:1 is too lean IMO... some car might be ok with it.. but generally that is pretty rare, and if they are they're completely stock. Title: Re: Best AFR for Perfomance vs. Economy Post by: TTQS on October 04, 2011, 05:50:54 AM Quote Also you're making very general statements... That's the impression I got from the OP, but didn't really want to upset anyone by stating that... :'( At the fundamental level, there will always be an AFR just before or just after stoichiometry which corresponds to the ideal mixture for best power or best economy, but as we all know, there are so many other factors (enrichment for component protection or enleanment for a stratified charge regime) that cause it to be modified, it's hardly merits a new thread. Doug Title: Re: Best AFR for Perfomance vs. Economy Post by: Gonzo on October 04, 2011, 07:41:32 AM you're assuming every engine is the same.. it's not... Your assuming that my comments were general statements. They aren't. Also you're making very general statements... the more boost you run the more chance of knock, the more fuel you will need to run to cool the charge and keep knock to a minimum... the problem is you get to a point where combustion suffers when going too rich (usually lower then 11.3 or so) and you actually start to misfire from too much fuel. 16.4:1 is too lean IMO... some car might be ok with it.. but generally that is pretty rare, and if they are they're completely stock. Read: I only use 93 :P You can go a lil richer. Depends on gas and other factors like IAT, etc. Edit: 99.9% of all my tuning work revolves around 1.8T. Take all of my posts with a grain of salt, just like you should with every other statement on an internet forum. The only way to figure out the best AFR for your setup is to do a custom tune. I'm just saying what works for ME, and I wanted to contribute something to this forum. In internal combustion engines there is a lot of factors that dictate what AFR you should run. In fact, just engine wear could affect that. Some like to be a little lean, some like to a little rich. The first graph I posted was for NA applications. For turbo applications you obviously want to go a little richer but it still gives you a good starting point. Also my 12v doesn't seem to mind being lean. I use only 93+ though. Stratified injection engines are another beast. You can go leaner on a stratified injection engine (TFSI/FSI) than on a 1.8T/2.7T and make good power. Title: Re: Best AFR for Perfomance vs. Economy Post by: s5fourdoor on October 04, 2011, 10:18:28 AM injectors and spark turns off on decel. ok so this isn't dangerous then? thanks for the info btw... could we put a link on the wiki for this? Title: Re: Best AFR for Perfomance vs. Economy Post by: NOTORIOUS VR on October 04, 2011, 11:15:42 AM no it's no dangerous... it prevents unburnt fuel getting to the catalytic(s). Every FI car does this (some very early fuel injection cars don't but that is still very rare).
Title: Re: Best AFR for Perfomance vs. Economy Post by: Rick on October 04, 2011, 12:52:50 PM As above,
it's been a feature of pretty much any ECU built in the last 25 years. It's a cat saving and fuel saving device. Nyet, I have done some work with leaded race fuel, which is pretty much completely knock proof, but I haven't come to a definite conclusion yet. I suspect though that best power will be around 12.5:1, and pretty flat from 11:1 to 13:1. ECUplot is really helpful for stuff like this :) Rick Title: Re: Best AFR for Perfomance vs. Economy Post by: Giannis on October 08, 2011, 04:40:15 AM I am running for some time now lambda 1.10 at low load part throttle conditions and i am decreasing it as the load goes higher than 80% to stock 1.00. I have a noticable fuel economy without any problems until now. Do you think that this it too lean? I have an 1.8t engine 180 ps.
Title: Re: Best AFR for Perfomance vs. Economy Post by: Gonzo on October 08, 2011, 02:16:32 PM No you should be OK :)
Title: Re: Best AFR for Perfomance vs. Economy Post by: jibberjive on October 24, 2011, 12:53:56 AM What is stock AFR for under load and partial load, for the 2.7t?
Title: Re: Best AFR for Perfomance vs. Economy Post by: robin on October 24, 2011, 05:40:02 AM stock 2.7T is 14.7 nearly everywhere, unless you're deep into 4th/5th gear during a long pull.
|