|
Title: units question for a huge number of maps Post by: s5fourdoor on October 10, 2011, 09:53:53 AM I was just wondering about the units on a large number of maps. Having read the m-box XDF, I found that the following maps share the same units convention: kfkhfm, kflf, kflbts, lamfa
My understanding of kflbts is that the unit is the actual target lambda. Also for lamfa, the unit is the target lambda. For kflf, again we are talking about desired lambda. However, unlike these three maps, KFKHFM does not show lambda, rather it shows a multiplier. Is this correct? If this is correct, this means that values less than 1 are leaning out the mixture, while values greater than 1 are enriching the mixture. Also, this means that unlike the other three target lambda tables here, the units operate in the opposite direction. After all, .8 lambda is a rich mixture, whereas in this case .8 would me less fuel, not more. Anyone? nyet? Title: Re: units question for a huge number of maps Post by: nyet on October 10, 2011, 10:09:59 AM Correct. Those target lambdas are actually atypical of ME7. Most stuff in ME are scaling factors (like KFKHFM), not absolute value targets.
Title: Re: units question for a huge number of maps Post by: Giannis on October 14, 2011, 11:44:18 PM KFLF is not lamda is a factor multiplied with basic fuel and it works inversive. 1.10 is 10% richer than 1.00 and 0.80 is leaner by 20%.
|