NefMoto

Technical => Tuning => Topic started by: BlkSerialKilla on October 30, 2017, 10:23:50 AM



Title: GTRS [GT2860RS] 1.8T [AWM] KFLDRL & KFLDIMX
Post by: BlkSerialKilla on October 30, 2017, 10:23:50 AM
Currently in process of attempting to revise my tune for my recent installation of my GT2860RS [eliminator on stock manifold]. I checked the wastegate with hand pump and it would appear it opens at 1.00~ bar pressure and I checked with the N75 electrical connection disconnected on car and boost is around 1.00-1.10 bar. I'm reviewing the information in regards to calibrating using CWMDAPP=8 & manually setting KFLDRAPP rows to needed DC and getting a table of boost in relation to DC in each condition. However is their a baseline configuration I could reference for KFLDRL and KFLDIMX that someone has done for this turbo & wastegate?

Currently limiting boost to 18-19 lbs of boost and planning to keep it so since i have 550cc injectors and running our of DC for the initial 11:1 AFR I was initially setting for safety, Planning on using 12.06 or 12.5 . Also I made the following maps like attached.
 

Yes in the future I do plan on building a block and getting full potential out of the turbo; Rods at very minimum.


Title: Re: GTRS [GT2860RS] 1.8T [AWM] KFLDRL & KFLDIMX
Post by: BlkSerialKilla on October 30, 2017, 05:23:29 PM
Was able to make a data log as well


Title: Re: GTRS [GT2860RS] 1.8T [AWM] KFLDRL & KFLDIMX
Post by: fknbrkn on October 30, 2017, 05:33:35 PM
you should rescale kfldimx axis
1000 mbar pretty useless if youre planning to go higher
and why not 95% during spool up?

also check s4wiki for tighter wastegate settings


Title: Re: GTRS [GT2860RS] 1.8T [AWM] KFLDRL & KFLDIMX
Post by: BlkSerialKilla on October 30, 2017, 05:40:34 PM
you should rescale kfldimx axis
1000 mbar pretty useless if youre planning to go higher
and why not 95% during spool up?

also check s4wiki for tighter wastegate settings

I had initial concerns since I have not replaced the rods no kidding the stakes I've setup with this setup almost make it not worth it  :(


Title: Re: GTRS [GT2860RS] 1.8T [AWM] KFLDRL & KFLDIMX
Post by: vwaudiguy on October 30, 2017, 08:52:08 PM
I had initial concerns since I have not replaced the rods no kidding the stakes I've setup with this setup almost make it not worth it  :(

Just don't floor it until like 5-6k and you'll be fine!


Title: Re: GTRS [GT2860RS] 1.8T [AWM] KFLDRL & KFLDIMX
Post by: fknbrkn on October 30, 2017, 09:34:57 PM
I had initial concerns since I have not replaced the rods no kidding the stakes I've setup with this setup almost make it not worth it  :(

whats the point to ask something then? just zeros those tables and run on wg pressure


Title: Re: GTRS [GT2860RS] 1.8T [AWM] KFLDRL & KFLDIMX
Post by: BlkSerialKilla on October 31, 2017, 12:32:35 AM
whats the point to ask something then? just zeros those tables and run on wg pressure

I may be over stating my concerns , I'm just trying to achieve what should be possible without being caviler about what I adjust and making a awful error I could avoid in my eagerness.


Title: Re: GTRS [GT2860RS] 1.8T [AWM] KFLDRL & KFLDIMX
Post by: TijnCU on October 31, 2017, 01:08:28 AM
Like fukenbroken said, focus on KFVPDKSD/E first, or it will be a total shitpile to drive below wastegate pressure.


Title: Re: GTRS [GT2860RS] 1.8T [AWM] KFLDRL & KFLDIMX
Post by: BlkSerialKilla on October 31, 2017, 07:37:35 PM
Like fukenbroken said, focus on KFVPDKSD/E first, or it will be a total shitpile to drive below wastegate pressure.

I read over this thread http://nefariousmotorsports.com/forum/index.php?topic=9221.60 and had made adjustments to KFVPDKSD and KFVPDKSE appeared to be 1:1 so I mirrored my alterations in each. I used log from running wastegate spring pressure without n75 plugged in and determined what would basic boost pressure as FR mentioned and rescaled PR axis to accommodate new PR @ 2.0, advanced columns 2-10 over to 3-11 and placed first column data into second column. I'm going to log this tomorrow morning and review. Am I looking at this correctly though?