|
Title: 06A906032LQ vs 06A906032LP Post by: stabilo87 on February 26, 2012, 02:31:33 PM My Ecu is 06A906032LQ is it compatible with the 06A906032LP/PL def's?
Ifnot would my Ecu be able to be flashed with a LP/PL .bin Thanks in advance Jason Title: Re: 06A906032LQ vs 06A906032LP Post by: stabilo87 on February 27, 2012, 10:17:36 AM REDIRECT,06A-906-032-AWP.LBL,06A-906-032-LP ; AWP (1J, 9M)
REDIRECT,06A-906-032-AWP.LBL,06A-906-032-LQ ; AWP (1J, 9M) Since they are both 1J, 9M does that mean the definitions should be the same? Title: Re: 06A906032LQ vs 06A906032LP Post by: rob.mwpropane on February 29, 2012, 02:43:02 AM In order for "definition" files to line up, the code has to match the same locations. Try opening up WinOLS demo by EVC and having a look at both files in 2D mode. See if they line up. If you need further assistance let us know. I'm not familiar with the hardware differences, if any, on those vehicles.
Title: Re: 06A906032LQ vs 06A906032LP Post by: stabilo87 on February 29, 2012, 07:10:20 AM I ran through Tunerpro using argdub's XDF for LP/PL on the LQ and LP and it appears that the maps i have defined, such as LAMFA, MLHFM, etc all have the exact same values.
so that should mean these will work together? Title: Re: 06A906032LQ vs 06A906032LP Post by: Gonzo on February 29, 2012, 07:45:45 AM Yes
Title: Re: 06A906032LQ vs 06A906032LP Post by: stabilo87 on February 29, 2012, 08:56:24 AM Thanks a bunch both of you :)
|