Title: SKC confirmation Post by: elewsader on February 08, 2013, 01:34:24 PM just looking to confirm from those with more experience that I've interpreted the correct SKC out of this:
ECU.bin file pulled using VAG_K+CAN_commander_v2.5 with a generic KKL cable. SKC should be 03016? -Thanks! Title: Re: SKC confirmation Post by: ddillenger on February 08, 2013, 03:38:14 PM You got it.
Title: Re: SKC confirmation Post by: EuroXs4 on November 17, 2014, 06:05:13 AM sorry to bring back an old thread.Can you tell me the address location of the pin?
Title: Re: SKC confirmation Post by: turboat on November 17, 2014, 06:21:27 AM http://nefariousmotorsports.com/forum/index.php?topic=5068.0title=
Title: Re: SKC confirmation Post by: tpzd3fq on November 17, 2014, 06:22:51 AM SKC should be 03016? D:\eeprom\et03>et03 ecu.bin 95040 Eeeprom Tool - 0.3 - No warranty implied or given, manually verify all cha nges before saving eeprom to ECU, this tool could cause permenent damage to ECU and prevent vehicle running Read in 512bytes WARNING: cannot decode VIN, try setting VIN to fix WARNING: cannot decode ImmmoID EEPROM Status: - VIN: - SKC: 03016 - Immobiliser: Error, set Immo - Checksum: Invalid Checksum - Size: 512bytes - Cluster Code: 2E C0 45 13 55 64 84 - P0601 DTC: set to 00 01 - Immo ID: - Softcoding ID: 65408 Title: Re: SKC confirmation Post by: tpzd3fq on November 17, 2014, 06:34:52 AM sorry to bring back an old thread.Can you tell me the address location of the pin? R u looking for sth like this?(http://) Title: Re: SKC confirmation Post by: k0mpresd on November 17, 2014, 06:37:32 AM except that picture doesnt have the skc location mapped out.
Title: Re: SKC confirmation Post by: tpzd3fq on November 17, 2014, 06:48:03 AM except that picture doesnt have the skc location mapped out. so......I found this one:-)(http://) Title: Re: SKC confirmation Post by: EuroXs4 on November 23, 2014, 06:31:25 PM i would assume if you have the skc from the ecu using vcds to adapt you dont need workshop code or date??
Title: Re: SKC confirmation Post by: turboat on November 24, 2014, 02:16:46 AM Correct. In theory at least.
|