Title: requested boost not high Post by: bomby on June 07, 2013, 11:06:38 AM Hi guys,
first time really asking e question here, been reading fore some time on this forum really grate to learn from. I have a problem with my requested boost from +-5000 to redline something is keeping my requested boost "to low" i'm tring to tune it to ask 2400-2450mbar until redline. I tried to increase KFMRIL en LDRXN but with no luck. i think some correction or safety factor is keeping requested lower. but don't know or cant find with one. Can someone take a look en point me in the good direction please. If you need something logged to see have me7 logger working ( really great tool btw). attached the stock file ant the file i have so far. HW i'm running Audi TT 8N 1.8T AUM engine Frankenturbo f23 kit 12psi wastegate FMIC from APR Milltek 3" downpipe sportcat maf sensor in 3" housing (put the map from tt225 is sw) rods from integrated engineering injectors 440cc greengiants running @ 4bfpr air intake neuspeed pflow singelmass 14lbs flywheel with sachs vr6 cluch Engine mounts "VF performance" Thanks fore the help Pieter-Jan Title: Re: requested boost not high Post by: ddillenger on June 07, 2013, 11:19:49 AM Have you changed KFLDHBN?
Title: Re: requested boost not high Post by: nyet on June 07, 2013, 11:25:45 AM Please upload the original .csv
Yours is corrupted and contains semicolons instead of commas. Did you edit it in excel before uploading? Title: Re: requested boost not high Post by: nyet on June 07, 2013, 11:27:30 AM Oh. I see.
Localization :( sigh. Title: Re: requested boost not high Post by: bomby on June 07, 2013, 11:28:44 AM yes it is increased but maybe not enough then?
But i don't see how this could be te limitations cause its al the same factors for the hole rev range. but then i don't know allot about it :D I'm still verry new to tuning the sw myself just don with installing al the hw so now trying to push to what it can make :) Title: Re: requested boost not high Post by: bomby on June 07, 2013, 11:30:57 AM Please upload the original .csv Yours is corrupted and contains semicolons instead of commas. Did you edit it in excel before uploading? yes i edited it with a tool called "CSVConv.exe" also used to make the vcds logs easy readable Title: Re: requested boost not high Post by: nyet on June 07, 2013, 12:01:46 PM Try ECUxPlot :P
also please upload the original .csvs. Title: Re: requested boost not high Post by: AARDQ on June 07, 2013, 12:12:00 PM But i don't see how this could be te limitations cause its al the same factors for the hole rev range. but then i don't know allot about it :D Research pressure ratio http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarrett/pressure_ratio and think about it in relation to what you are asking of the system via LDRXN. You may see why "Its all the same factors for the hole rev range" makes no sense. (In more ways than one, lol) Title: Re: requested boost not high Post by: bomby on June 07, 2013, 12:37:50 PM Try ECUxPlot :P also please upload the original .csvs. I made a new log and didn't chanced it this time also i increased the map KFLDHBN but with no success. so i think there is a other limitation actief. Title: Re: requested boost not high Post by: ddillenger on June 07, 2013, 12:42:35 PM Go ahead and FF KFLDHBN for testing. (put the max value in) and see if anything changes. What does your timing look like? No chance you're knocking excessively?
Title: Re: requested boost not high Post by: bomby on June 07, 2013, 12:49:18 PM Group A: '003 Group B: '115 Group C: '020
RPM Mass Flow Load Ign, Timing RPM Load Absolute Pres, Absolute Pres, Idle Stabilization Idle Stabilization Idle Stabilization Idle Stabilization TIME TIME TIME Marker STAMP /min g/s % °BTDC STAMP /min % mbar mbar STAMP °KW °KW °KW °KW 0,86 2480 21,92 13,3 25,5 0,26 2440 46,6 1010 1050 0,56 0 0 0 0 1,77 2560 24,5 14,5 25,5 1,16 2480 47,4 1010 1060 1,46 0 0 0 0 2,67 2640 25,33 15,3 25,5 2,07 2560 48,9 1010 1060 2,37 0 0 0 0 3,58 2760 45,5 29 22,5 2,97 2640 51,9 1010 1070 3,27 0 0 0 0 4,48 2960 72,33 100 17,3 3,88 2800 97 1580 1230 4,18 0 0 0 0 5,39 3320 112,75 100 5,3 4,78 3080 133,1 2440 1690 5,09 0 0 0 0 6,29 3840 165,03 100 3,8 5,69 3480 185 2430 2390 5,99 0 0 0 1,5 7,2 4360 187,25 100 5,3 6,59 4000 191,7 2480 2540 6,89 1,5 1,5 1,5 4,5 8,11 4840 182,86 100 7,5 7,5 4560 191,7 2450 2460 7,8 1,5 3 1,5 6 9,01 5240 185,97 99,6 9 8,4 5000 191,7 2420 2420 8,72 1,5 3 1,5 5,3 9,92 5640 196,33 99,6 8,3 9,31 5400 184,2 2340 2300 9,61 1,5 3 1,5 5,3 10,82 6000 198,22 100 15 10,21 5760 178,2 2250 2270 10,53 1,5 1,5 0,8 3,8 11,73 6360 205,36 100 16,5 11,13 6120 171,4 2220 2180 11,43 0 0 2,3 2,3 12,64 6240 19,72 8,2 15 12,04 6320 46,6 1010 1850 12,33 0 0 0 0 quick copie from a vcds log where the CF's are in. pulled away some of the timing in kfzw because there was alot of CF but now is is "ok" think But yes there is knock but wouldn't call ist excessively Title: Re: requested boost not high Post by: nyet on June 07, 2013, 12:55:34 PM perhaps this?
http://nefariousmotorsports.com/forum/index.php?topic=3981.msg40462#msg40462 Title: Re: requested boost not high Post by: phila_dot on June 07, 2013, 01:04:24 PM perhaps this? http://nefariousmotorsports.com/forum/index.php?topic=3981.msg40462#msg40462 My first post there applys to ME7 where the map is only active with a temp error. Is it confirmed that rlsol follows rlmax which is limited compared to rlmx? Title: Re: requested boost not high Post by: bomby on June 07, 2013, 01:45:46 PM Go ahead and FF KFLDHBN for testing. (put the max value in) and see if anything changes. What does your timing look like? No chance you're knocking excessively? i FFed it end now it is oke requested is higher and probably wil folow ldrxn now so it was the limit, thanks everyone. Would it be ok/safe to leave it ff and control requested boost just with ldrxn en kmirl Title: Re: requested boost not high Post by: ddillenger on June 07, 2013, 01:46:29 PM Safe, yes. Correct, no.
Copy the table from a k04 car. Title: Re: requested boost not high Post by: bomby on June 07, 2013, 01:48:43 PM Safe, yes. Correct, no. Copy the table from a k04 car. Don't think the stock map from k04 will do because the map values i had before where already higher. but maybe can use it as e good start. Title: Re: requested boost not high Post by: AARDQ on June 07, 2013, 03:07:39 PM 23 psig (assuming sea level and a low pressure drop inlet system) gives a pressure ratio of about 2.8. Given a flow of 33-34 lbs/min at 7*C you're well within the capabilities of the compressor given the compressor map on the FT site
http://www.frankenturbo.com/new/webimages/large/F23MAP.jpg. The MAP sensor will max before you run off the compressor map (at which point you've lost protection anyway). IOW, it looks like you should be safe at 3.0 and KFLDHBN will protect you if you overboost (well, it would if the MAP sensor weren't maxed in that situation). All this said, you're much better off figuring it out for yourself than relying on a total stranger's calculations. Title: Re: requested boost not high Post by: bomby on June 08, 2013, 12:54:45 PM ok so i have found the problem with my KFLDHBN map and wy i didn't see the restriction in the map at first.
I had the map named in my olsfile but not the axis and it was "swapt" so i was making the adoptions in the wrong part of the map with no result on the requested boost. So now it works and can i keep the "safety" in case op really high intake temps :) Title: Re: requested boost not high Post by: AARDQ on June 08, 2013, 07:59:14 PM At the risk of seeming pedantic, pressure ratio is just pressure at the outlet of turbo minus pressure at the inlet and isn't directly tied to ambient temp. If ambient pressure is low (like when a storm's a brewin', or if you're at altitude), pressure ratio will be higher to the extent the compressor is able to generate the desired boost. There are plenty of hot days with high ambient pressure where pressure ratio is lower than 'normal' and plenty of low ambient pressure cool days where pressure ratio is higher than 'normal'.
Really, KFLDHBN can come into play independent of ambient temp, especially with small turbos like the K03. Glad you got figured out. |