|
Title: Actual vs Requested Post by: vdubnation on June 24, 2013, 10:15:21 PM Anyone have any idea why Actual Load isnt meeting requested ?
Check out the logs 2001 A6 me7.1.1 s6 file Title: Re: Actual vs Requested Post by: nyet on June 24, 2013, 10:44:16 PM Who cares? It's an NA car :P
Title: Re: Actual vs Requested Post by: vdubnation on June 24, 2013, 10:46:37 PM curiosity hehehhe
trying to get everything down the right way Title: Re: Actual vs Requested Post by: ddillenger on June 24, 2013, 10:48:25 PM Looks like the intake flap changeover points are where the hole is.
Title: Re: Actual vs Requested Post by: nyet on June 24, 2013, 11:01:53 PM I'm kinda unclear how you can force an NA car to see 100% load...
Title: Re: Actual vs Requested Post by: ddillenger on June 24, 2013, 11:21:34 PM I'm sorry Nye, are you saying you think that hole is normal? I agree 100 percent is unreasonable to expect, but 75 seems low, especially considering....
well, look at it. Title: Re: Actual vs Requested Post by: nyet on June 24, 2013, 11:26:26 PM Can't say. Don't know anything about that motor, or tuning it :/
I can say (from logging other MAF based NA cars) that 80% load isn't uncommon, especially at altitude or hot weather. Title: Re: Actual vs Requested Post by: Carsinc on June 24, 2013, 11:36:21 PM I think this is a hardware problem.
How does the car run? I know very little about these logs, I use vag com (I know it sucks) but its what I'm used to. I have seen some very intresting problems with this motor. Can you tell me more about the car and what mods it has. Title: Re: Actual vs Requested Post by: nyet on June 25, 2013, 09:35:25 AM My first guess would be a post MAF intake leak.
Is the car running lean? Title: Re: Actual vs Requested Post by: vdubnation on June 25, 2013, 10:57:27 AM Car feels real healthy no signs of running lean or rich.
Intake flap maps kfsu and kfsu2 were 00'd for this run. Am I right in assuming kfsu is for VVT inactive, and kfsu2 is for VVT active? The tables contain 1s and 2s, is 1 the flaps opening, whereas 2 is completely open? Title: Re: Actual vs Requested Post by: Carsinc on June 25, 2013, 11:52:30 AM I'm thinking that looks better, My guess from the first logs was going to be cam timing, I've seen many different reasons for these motors to
not be timed correctly, I wish both intake and ex cams had position sensors :( Title: Re: Actual vs Requested Post by: ddillenger on June 25, 2013, 12:06:45 PM Seems that by tuning the intake flap changeover that could be smoothed a bit. Anyone ever done this?
Title: Re: Actual vs Requested Post by: NOTORIOUS VR on June 25, 2013, 12:19:15 PM does the car feel better with the 2nd log where act. load is higher?
Title: Re: Actual vs Requested Post by: vdubnation on June 25, 2013, 01:17:41 PM does the car feel better with the 2nd log where act. load is higher? Significantly better Title: Re: Actual vs Requested Post by: NOTORIOUS VR on June 25, 2013, 01:25:34 PM awesome!
|