Title: LDRXN_0_A vs LDRXN_1_A? Post by: stuklr on January 21, 2014, 11:56:11 AM I am dailing in an ME7.1.1 tune BEL 2.7t 551R box.
I notice thet this layout has both LDRXN_0_A and LDRXN_1_A listed. I have been setting both to the same values and had good results. Is the _1_A overboost? Can that be setup differently? When would it be active? Or am i way off and its just how my def is organized. Title: Re: LDRXN_0_A vs LDRXN_1_A? Post by: ddillenger on January 21, 2014, 12:11:07 PM VARDEF.
One is for variant coding, IE A6 vs Allroad, or Auto vs Manual. The 551R has many different coding variations. Title: Re: LDRXN_0_A vs LDRXN_1_A? Post by: stuklr on January 21, 2014, 12:42:40 PM Ah, makes sense then. Thats how they get away with using the same .bin for both trans. Thanks
Title: Re: LDRXN_0_A vs LDRXN_1_A? Post by: slappynuts on July 07, 2015, 01:57:02 PM Ah I see, that explains a lot :D
|