|
Title: 06a906032rn xdf Post by: smelly240 on January 23, 2014, 08:51:36 AM Here is a mildly capable xdf for those of u with 03/04 jetta gli to use... its a start at least.
Title: Re: 06a906032rn xdf Post by: hello on January 24, 2014, 03:01:17 AM Good work. I am also working on "procrastinating" i should say on a rn.
Title: Re: 06a906032rn xdf Post by: smelly240 on January 24, 2014, 06:48:20 AM I have a bunch more to put into the xdf - just been busy lately working on some other stuffs.
Title: Re: 06a906032rn xdf Post by: vwaudiguy on February 26, 2015, 02:05:10 PM Working on this one myself. Did you post an update somewhere? Thanks!
Title: Re: 06a906032rn xdf Post by: smelly240 on February 26, 2015, 09:48:53 PM i have a pretty good .kp for it but LP/PL is a much better option for this ecu. I dont even mess with the RN files anymore.
Title: Re: 06a906032rn xdf Post by: vwaudiguy on February 26, 2015, 10:30:30 PM See next post :)
Title: Re: 06a906032rn xdf Post by: vwaudiguy on February 26, 2015, 10:31:36 PM i have a pretty good .kp for it but LP/PL is a much better option for this ecu. I dont even mess with the RN files anymore. I often wonder what folks are specifically referring to when they say things like this. Are there some tangible differences between files for the same hardware meaning ecu and engine?? Title: Re: 06a906032rn xdf Post by: ddillenger on February 26, 2015, 10:32:10 PM I often wonder what folks are specifically referring to when they say things like this. Are there some tangible differences between files for the same hardware meaning ecu and engine?? It's a lazy thing :P LP/PL are nearly fully defined. Title: Re: 06a906032rn xdf Post by: vwaudiguy on February 26, 2015, 10:36:48 PM It's a lazy thing :P LP/PL are nearly fully defined. Are you being serious? :) Title: Re: 06a906032rn xdf Post by: SB_GLI on February 27, 2015, 06:52:21 PM Are you being serious? :) Yes. You can crossflash PL/LP to RN. And with the definitions already available, some might choose to use that as their base. Pretty common, even for big name tuners. Title: Re: 06a906032rn xdf Post by: ddillenger on February 27, 2015, 07:10:20 PM Are you being serious? :) Yes. People use whatever file's easiest. That's why everyone uses the 551M and 551L. It's easy. Title: Re: 06a906032rn xdf Post by: vwaudiguy on February 27, 2015, 08:24:27 PM Oh, I understand that, and think its efficient for everyone to use what's best/already defined, as long as it offers the same functionality to achieve your goal. I was wondering if there are actual reasons to use one software version/revision over another using the same hardware. Why waste time defining a bunch of different files that do the exact same thing. Other than for practice I suppose. I guess it would be akin to doing crossword puzzles or Sudoku. I've often heard people saying they prefer one version over the next, and it didn't seem like it was solely because it was better defined.
Title: Re: 06a906032rn xdf Post by: smelly240 on February 28, 2015, 08:53:48 AM :) - i did most of the RN stuff in WinOLS just because it was super easy comparing the GLI file to the GTI file - but ive never even used it...
|