Title: Volumetric Efficiency tables Post by: Lost on December 11, 2014, 10:12:44 AM I can`t get this clear for me.
Which table/tables would consider VE in Me7, and how too improve it? Title: Re: Volumetric Efficiency tables Post by: nyet on December 11, 2014, 10:15:22 AM There are many, many, many tables which depend on VE.
BTW changing those tables does not change the VE. Title: Re: Volumetric Efficiency tables Post by: Lost on December 11, 2014, 12:00:50 PM BTW changing those tables does not change the VE.
[/quote] I know that VE is beeing changed by hardware. Can you be more specific about which tables? Title: Re: Volumetric Efficiency tables Post by: nyet on December 11, 2014, 01:21:58 PM Depends on what you are trying to fix. Going through every table that has to be altered depending on VE would be a monumental task.
Title: Re: Volumetric Efficiency tables Post by: Lost on December 11, 2014, 10:26:03 PM Depends on what you are trying to fix. Going through every table that has to be altered depending on VE would be a monumental task. I am not fixing anything. I just want to know, what, why, how..... Title: Re: Volumetric Efficiency tables Post by: julex on December 12, 2014, 08:00:49 AM I am not fixing anything. I just want to know, what, why, how..... Singularly most important map that can tell you what kind of efficiency engine is given NWS state and RPMs is map KFURL, it is used in conversion of air mass (PS, PS_W) to load (RL, RL_W) as visible in loggers and used through ME7. RL/RL_W is then naturally used downstream for everything. Title: Re: Volumetric Efficiency tables Post by: Lost on December 12, 2014, 09:01:02 AM Singularly most important map that can tell you what kind of efficiency engine is given NWS state and RPMs is map KFURL, it is used in conversion of air mass (PS, PS_W) to load (RL, RL_W) as visible in loggers and used through ME7. RL/RL_W is then naturally used downstream for everything. Alright, thanx Julex, I will look into this. Title: Re: Volumetric Efficiency tables Post by: nyet on December 12, 2014, 11:46:00 AM To what end? Small changes in VE aren't going to change the tune much; it will only screw up your req boost *even if you get it right* if you are targeting max power, and throw off the PID. rl is only used as a reference everywhere else, even if it is "wrong" you have to retune ALL the places where rl is used anyway.
Title: Re: Volumetric Efficiency tables Post by: Lost on December 12, 2014, 01:42:22 PM To what end? Small changes in VE aren't going to change the tune much; it will only screw up your req boost *even if you get it right* if you are targeting max power, and throw off the PID. rl is only used as a reference everywhere else, even if it is "wrong" you have to retune ALL the places where rl is used anyway. Learning and understanding. Title: Re: Volumetric Efficiency tables Post by: nyet on December 12, 2014, 02:07:02 PM Learning and understanding. VE determines how much air mass is flowing through the motor for a given intake manifold pressure and RPM. Or the other way around: how much pressure is required to move a certain amount of air mass through the motor. Anywhere those calculations need to be done, VE is required. Title: Re: Volumetric Efficiency tables Post by: prj on December 14, 2014, 04:49:54 AM VE in ME7 is not used like it would be used in a standalone ECU.
The maps most related to VE are KFPBRK, KFPBRKNW, KFPRG, KFURL. But technically you almost never need to change them. The most important part in ME7 is to have msdk_w and mshfm_w be as equal as possible, and make sure that ps_w is not much smaller than pvdk_w, otherwise you get into other sorts of trouble. Title: Re: Volumetric Efficiency tables Post by: Lost on December 14, 2014, 07:11:34 AM VE in ME7 is not used like it would be used in a standalone ECU. The maps most related to VE are KFPBRK, KFPBRKNW, KFPRG, KFURL. But technically you almost never need to change them. The most important part in ME7 is to have msdk_w and mshfm_w be as equal as possible, and make sure that ps_w is not much smaller than pvdk_w, otherwise you get into other sorts of trouble. I have noticed that reading a book on standalones. That's what made me interested of finding out and understanding it in our ECUs. Thanx for the info boys!! Title: Re: Volumetric Efficiency tables Post by: nyet on December 14, 2014, 12:34:27 PM make sure that ps_w is not much smaller than pvdk_w, otherwise you get into other sorts of trouble. Or the other way around, if pvdk_w is near the ECU pressure limit and you aren't running the 5120 hack. Title: Re: Volumetric Efficiency tables Post by: prj on December 18, 2014, 06:51:28 AM Or the other way around, if pvdk_w is near the ECU pressure limit and you aren't running the 5120 hack. Don't recommend it. Underscaling and messing with scaling results in lots of weirdness in load prediction and other code.Title: Re: Volumetric Efficiency tables Post by: nyet on December 18, 2014, 10:58:03 AM if ps_w is near the pressure limit you have no choice but to underscale, or run the 5120 hack.
Title: Re: Volumetric Efficiency tables Post by: aef on October 12, 2015, 06:25:14 AM VE in ME7 is not used like it would be used in a standalone ECU. The maps most related to VE are KFPBRK, KFPBRKNW, KFPRG, KFURL. But technically you almost never need to change them. The most important part in ME7 is to have msdk_w and mshfm_w be as equal as possible, and make sure that ps_w is not much smaller than pvdk_w, otherwise you get into other sorts of trouble. My 1.8t is displaced to 2L. I changed KUMSRL and KISRM by calculating and i changed KFURL to make my ps_w follow my rl_w. What i dont unterstand is the Part in the FR were the msdk_w should follow mshfm_w. Is KFPRG the map to change? Title: Re: Volumetric Efficiency tables Post by: Lost on October 12, 2015, 08:36:33 AM I belive it is TB maps. WDKUGND, KFWDKMSN. KFMSNWDK
Title: Re: Volumetric Efficiency tables Post by: aef on October 12, 2015, 10:53:36 AM http://nefariousmotorsports.com/forum/index.php?topic=5238.msg49915#msg49915
Hmm makes sense maybe.... Will try tomorrow. MAF and Throttlebody is original S3. Just displacement changed. So maybe this is not the right map to change. ??? Title: Re: Volumetric Efficiency tables Post by: Lost on October 12, 2015, 12:31:37 PM Do please and post your results.
Title: Re: Volumetric Efficiency tables Post by: dream3R on October 12, 2015, 02:12:33 PM I found my ps_w lined up nice with pvdk_w once I replaced the inlet manifold, so remember not all s/w :)
Title: Re: Volumetric Efficiency tables Post by: aef on October 13, 2015, 12:40:48 AM But my inlet is stock too
Title: Re: Volumetric Efficiency tables Post by: dream3R on October 13, 2015, 12:42:15 AM But my inlet is stock too Might be worth spraying carb cleaner around the gaskets etc. Just a thought. Title: Re: Volumetric Efficiency tables Post by: aef on October 13, 2015, 08:34:47 AM I tried to modify the last row of wdkmsn and msnwdk but this didnt change anything.
I changed WDKUGDN from 3000rpm up to the last row and this changed my massairflowatthrottleplate was this the right map to go with, idk :-X Title: Re: Volumetric Efficiency tables Post by: Lost on October 13, 2015, 08:58:53 AM It sure is :) Great.
How did you expirience the difference Before and after besides the log ofcourse? Title: Re: Volumetric Efficiency tables Post by: aef on October 13, 2015, 10:03:21 AM nothing chanced, feels like the same before and after
Title: Re: Volumetric Efficiency tables Post by: Lost on October 13, 2015, 11:09:41 AM It should not either. If your Maf failed and you hade not calibrate it as you did. Car would run like shit is my guess.
Title: Re: Volumetric Efficiency tables Post by: prj on October 14, 2015, 11:52:52 AM Not correct.
Look at the fast path flow equalization routines. fkmsdk and so on. Not active in all softwares, but it is something that will catch you out really badly at some point if you do not do things right. Also, throttle control is better with correct maps. So ECU knows when to go WOT. Title: Re: Volumetric Efficiency tables Post by: Lost on October 14, 2015, 10:19:53 PM Ok, thanx for explanation.
I will look into this. Title: Re: Volumetric Efficiency tables Post by: aef on October 24, 2015, 07:18:33 AM Not correct. Look at the fast path flow equalization routines. fkmsdk and so on. Not active in all softwares, but it is something that will catch you out really badly at some point if you do not do things right. Also, throttle control is better with correct maps. So ECU knows when to go WOT. Okay i changed WDKUGDN and it worked but you told me it is wrong. In another thread you wrote to change WDKUGDN. http://nefariousmotorsports.com/forum/index.php?topic=4381.msg72257#msg72257 Now im confused even more. Title: Re: Volumetric Efficiency tables Post by: Jim_Coupe on October 30, 2015, 06:55:12 AM Mocke are you from the "stand alone" world and want to know where to tune VE? didnt quite understand.
Title: Re: Volumetric Efficiency tables Post by: Lost on October 30, 2015, 08:14:32 AM No man. I was reading a book about stand alone tuning back then bofore i got better understanding of Me7.
Title: Re: Volumetric Efficiency tables Post by: prj on October 30, 2015, 09:34:21 AM Okay i changed WDKUGDN and it worked but you told me it is wrong. In another thread you wrote to change WDKUGDN. http://nefariousmotorsports.com/forum/index.php?topic=4381.msg72257#msg72257 Now im confused even more. WDKUGDN is the correct map to change. If your throttle maps are already correct for the throttle you are using (copy paste them from original software for that throttle if you are using a different throttle). |