|
Title: General consensus on these logs Post by: robsa6 on April 25, 2015, 05:53:27 PM Ok so as the title states I'm looking for ideas and constructive criticism regarding these logs. I've been collecting info like a madman for months and slowly bringing my a6 to the point of these logs. The car is ko4's, EV14 550cc, new 710n's, catless dps w/full 2.5 magnaflow exhaust, lwfw, Stock MAF, 6MT... Thanks in advance and bring on the discussion.
Title: Re: General consensus on these logs Post by: nyet on April 25, 2015, 06:00:15 PM Please post the log itself :)
Title: Re: General consensus on these logs Post by: vwaudiguy on April 25, 2015, 06:01:28 PM No expert here, but looking at the log(s) with load, it looks like you need to log rl_w instead of rl so it does not flatline @ 191. Variables with _w are 16 bit vs. 8 bit non _w.
Title: Re: General consensus on these logs Post by: robsa6 on April 25, 2015, 06:27:07 PM Thanks for the tip. I was wondering what the differences were! I'll re log tomorrow and change that. So the FATS time huh? HA I don't know what happened but I don't think im anywhere near that fast! I am wondering what I might have done wrong with the hp and tq graphs. Car feels good (ie faster than 300 hp but slower than 2.25 FATS)
Title: Re: General consensus on these logs Post by: nyet on April 25, 2015, 06:34:33 PM So the FATS time huh? Its only showing your 2nd gear pull because your 3rd gear pull didn't start at a low enough rpm. Log looks good though, good job. Title: Re: General consensus on these logs Post by: robsa6 on April 25, 2015, 06:42:15 PM Thanks Nyet. This was all done traveling from long island to charlotte adjusting my fueling at rest areas... Brick my ECU? pffft. Honestly I was worried to death but it was killing me to watch my a/f meter run rich
|