NefMoto

Technical => Tuning => Topic started by: terminator on September 25, 2019, 02:35:34 AM



Title: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: terminator on September 25, 2019, 02:35:34 AM
I’m trying to set up K-03 hybrid turbos.
I set CWMDAPP to 8, wrote about 12 logs with different DC and filled KFLDIMX with the right DC values. At least DC values are very-very close to the truth.
Turbos are K-03 Hybrid. At 2700RPM and 95%DC the boost is about 1000mbar, at 3000RPM it’s already 1520-1540mbar.
But after I changed CWMDAPP from 8 to 0 everything goes weird.
Requested DC goes up and down all the time. I’ve tried to zeroed KFLDRQ2 and LDRQ0DY and the same thing. I’ve tried to set the same values and nothing has changed.
So I’m really stuck with it. I’ve always thought that DC = KFLDIMX  + LDRQ0DY - KFLDRQ2. But it looks like I was wrong. KFLDRL is lineal. 20% = 20%, 95% = 95% etc.
Another problem is ME7 Logger. I can’t connect it to the car. The echo test is ok, then slow init and nothing. I use genuine VCDS. So I have no chance to find out what’s happening with P, I, D separately.
Any help would be appreciated.


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: armageddon on September 25, 2019, 03:54:42 AM
http://nefariousmotorsports.com/forum/index.php?topic=12352.0title=


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: nyet on September 25, 2019, 10:08:37 AM
You're not going to be able to do PID tuning w/o me7logger.



Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: terminator on September 26, 2019, 01:31:58 AM
Because VAG COM is too slow?
I tried ME7Logger on another laptop and got the same problem: slow init 11 and no connection.


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: prj on September 26, 2019, 02:28:58 AM
Because you can't log any of the PID variables.
Also, KFLDIMX is not a WGDC table, it's I limit...


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: terminator on September 26, 2019, 03:06:34 AM
Ok, thanks.
I don't know why ME7Logger could not connect. Maybe the ECU address is not 0x11?


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: terminator on September 26, 2019, 03:54:03 AM
I've just read the thread
http://nefariousmotorsports.com/forum/index.php?topic=12466.0title= (http://nefariousmotorsports.com/forum/index.php?topic=12466.0title=)

So I'm gonna try this way today.


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: nyet on September 26, 2019, 09:46:11 AM
If this is ME7.1 you should have no k line issues unless you have an aftermarket radio on the kline.

I'd try different VCDS drivers, in particular the VCP driver, and make sure boot intelligent mode is off. This is all mentioned in the various README and you didn't mention if you tried them.


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: Blazius on September 26, 2019, 11:33:36 AM
and try slow 0x00 for the proper 5 baud init, can also try to pull dash fuse in conjunction.


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: nyet on September 26, 2019, 12:14:07 PM
Next time please note the P/N

i see it is 4z but please put it in the topic at least. I had to download your rar and unrar it to figure it out.


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: terminator on September 28, 2019, 11:24:07 AM
Thanks to everyone, but now I just can't connect at all, because of ftd2xx.dll
I posted it here
http://nefariousmotorsports.com/forum/index.php?topic=837.480




Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: nyet on September 28, 2019, 11:53:13 AM
The dll should come with the standard ftdi driver


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: terminator on September 28, 2019, 12:11:45 PM
Maybe it's a stupid question, but where can I get the standard ftdi driver?


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: terminator on September 28, 2019, 01:31:52 PM
I've solved it. I copied ftd2xx.dll to Wow64 folder (not System32),  because Windows 64bit.
While ignition is turned on, me7logger can be connected as well. (Slow init 0x00)
Now I have another problem. When the engine is started, the logger can't be connected to the car. I attached the screenshot.

Should I pull the fuse?


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: Blazius on September 28, 2019, 01:45:59 PM
I've solved it. I copied ftd2xx.dll to Wow64 folder (not System32),  because Windows 64bit.
While ignition is turned on, me7logger can be connected as well. (Slow init 0x00)
Now I have another problem. When the engine is started, the logger can't be connected to the car. I attached the screenshot.

Should I pull the fuse?


Connect before starting car and/or try pulling dash fuse.


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: terminator on September 28, 2019, 02:13:58 PM
I've tried to connect before starting, but after starting the engine it throws me error os_sendbuf(len=3, data= 01 B7 B8)
And TCU goes in limp mode.

Will try pulling dash fuse. Thanks!


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: terminator on October 03, 2019, 05:54:25 AM
I finally connected the logger.
First I connected Nefmoto flasher. It opened 0x01, then 0x11 session. I closed nefmoto (it was still connected) and connected the logger at the same baudrate as nefmoto (125000, 0x11).

I think ME7Logger does not open one more session or something like that. Nefmoto does.




Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: BlackT on October 03, 2019, 06:43:00 AM
I finally connected the logger.
First I connected Nefmoto flasher. It opened 0x01, then 0x11 session. I closed nefmoto (it was still connected) and connected the logger at the same baudrate as nefmoto (125000, 0x11).

I think ME7Logger does not open one more session or something like that. Nefmoto does.



you connected nefmoto while engine ruining?


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: terminator on October 03, 2019, 08:29:33 AM
No, while ignition was turned on, then logger, then I started the engine.


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: BlackT on October 03, 2019, 09:50:47 AM
I have that problem on friends TT 512 kb ECU. While ignition on i can conncet. When engine is runming I can't connect. Vcds lite, nefmoto, me7loger no one of this won't connect while engine is running.  (Vcds 11 can connect)
I try to pull fuses from dashboard,ABS, navigation unit. Still no luck


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: Lost on October 03, 2019, 11:08:54 AM
Run direct K-line from OBD - Ecu.
It will always connect.


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: terminator on October 03, 2019, 12:05:20 PM
I have that problem on friends TT 512 kb ECU. While ignition on i can conncet. When engine is runming I can't connect. Vcds lite, nefmoto, me7loger no one of this won't connect while engine is running.  (Vcds 11 can connect)
I try to pull fuses from dashboard,ABS, navigation unit. Still no luck

Try another baud rate. For example 9600 nefmoto, then 10400 ME7Logger. 


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: terminator on October 03, 2019, 12:58:42 PM
Here is my log. Now I know that P-component is pretty weird... at least for me.

P-Anteil: ( LDRQ0DY ( bzw. LDRQ0S ) - KFLDRQ2 ( bzw. 0 ) ) * lde = ldptv

What did I miss? Please give me a hint.





Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: nyet on October 03, 2019, 04:48:17 PM
That isn't a log, thats an utterly useless screen shot.


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: terminator on October 04, 2019, 01:29:48 AM
The question is not about the log, but about P-component.

Anyway here is another problem with the hardware (underboost), so first I have to fix it.


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: BlackT on October 04, 2019, 02:27:30 AM
We can't use that log to find problem, put CSV file so the users can view it with ECUxplot


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: terminator on October 04, 2019, 05:07:40 AM
Thank you all for the help, but N75 was dead, so the log is corrupted. I'm gonna log it one more time tomorrow.


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: terminator on October 06, 2019, 04:47:24 AM
Here is the log. Please take a look.
Maybe I'm wrong but the problem starts between 2800 - 3100RPM. The boost goes up from 2000mb to 2400mbar and it takes only 0.3sec

Strange turbos... 0.3 bar at 2000RPM... So first I would like to set LDRXN according to this. In that case lde will be closer to 0.
And also I'm going to set DC less started from 2000RPM, so it has more time to reduce boost.
 


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: fknbrkn on October 06, 2019, 06:01:45 AM
i see 2 probs here:
1 boost cannot be controlled after 6k
2 pid


get a pressure test wg lines. check for leaks, actuator rod moving etc. probably one of them faulty
check n75 in another car

log it with TVLDMX = 0 and ldrxn ~180
if you see boost goes high after 6k with  then probably wg hole should be ported

as second
did you flat KFLDRL? k03 wont work good with that
is it stock springs in actuators used?
cap DIMX @3k ~~~40%
raise Q2
play with Q1ST


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: nyet on October 06, 2019, 07:16:27 AM
Your IMX is a mess during spool. Bring it down significantly. It should be flat until you reach desired boost


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: terminator on October 06, 2019, 11:40:41 AM
Your IMX is a mess during spool. Bring it down significantly. It should be flat until you reach desired boost

Thanks, gonna test it tomorrow.
But the spool is very weird, in my opinion. I attached another VCDS log (70% DC), that I've made before.




Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: terminator on October 06, 2019, 12:12:42 PM
i see 2 probs here:
1 boost cannot be controlled after 6k
2 pid


get a pressure test wg lines. check for leaks, actuator rod moving etc. probably one of them faulty
check n75 in another car

log it with TVLDMX = 0 and ldrxn ~180
if you see boost goes high after 6k with  then probably wg hole should be ported

as second
did you flat KFLDRL? k03 wont work good with that
is it stock springs in actuators used?
cap DIMX @3k ~~~40%
raise Q2
play with Q1ST

N75 is new. I'm pretty sure it's because of PID. But it's because of the pressure can't be dropped down in a short period of time. Like a Chinese Turbo with restricted WG port.

The spool is not lineal at all. When DC is 95% it goes like
RPM  2100  2400 2800 3100 
Mbar 1300 1500 1900  2800

That's why N75 should start reducing DC from at least 2400RPM. This is my theory and I'm gonna check it tomorrow.
I've raised Q2 magnificently and brought Q0 and IMX down. I hope there will be no oscillations.


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: nyet on October 06, 2019, 10:02:10 PM
Don't touch any of the Q params until you have an IMX that makes sense. You're wasting your time adjusting more than one thing at once.


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: terminator on October 19, 2019, 07:14:12 AM
Looks like I've found the problem) WG coudn't be fully open due to poor adjustment.  

But now I have another problem. I can't request more than 200% of rlsol and rlmax at middle RPM. The requested load goes down from 2000RPM until 4200RPM and then rises up again.


IRL/IOP are ok, LDRXN was set to 230%, KFLDHBN 2.55 KFPED 100%

What did I miss? Please give me a hint.


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: BlackT on October 19, 2019, 07:16:47 AM
KFLDHBN limiting you load, but that is good beacuse you expect 1.5 boost at red line with K04?


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: terminator on October 19, 2019, 08:03:44 AM
How can this be if I set KFLDHBN to 2.6?

1.5bar is for test only. PID is currently disabled. 


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: BlackT on October 19, 2019, 08:26:57 AM
How can this be if I set KFLDHBN to 2.6?

1.5bar is for test only. PID is currently disabled. 
you have to options, to read how ME7 convert load to boost and get answer to you question.
Or set that whole table to lets say 2.9-3.0 and dont think about it


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: terminator on October 19, 2019, 09:13:59 AM
Thanx, I set up it to 3 and now rlsol is 205 and boost is about 1.4bar)


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: terminator on October 19, 2019, 10:42:47 AM
I set 4 and the same load 205. I'm pretty sure there is another limit.


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: BlackT on October 19, 2019, 11:08:11 AM
Post log again


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: terminator on October 19, 2019, 01:18:40 PM
Attached


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: BlackT on October 19, 2019, 01:43:55 PM
Now you get rid of ldrlts
But how your LDRXN values looks like?


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: terminator on October 19, 2019, 02:00:30 PM
Here it is. Also I attached the files above.


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: terminator on October 19, 2019, 02:02:49 PM
Please note, I set CWMDAPP to 8, so PID is disabled now.


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: BlackT on October 19, 2019, 02:17:25 PM
Maybe to high IAT or knock will give you smaller values to rlmax_w. I never goo too deep in that conversion rlmx to rlmax. 
Page 855 in FR maybe can give you a answer


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: terminator on October 19, 2019, 02:33:04 PM
Maybe the reason is TCU from ABT? I did some 4z7 files with MT and never had any problem up to 2.0-2.1bar...







Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: terminator on October 21, 2019, 01:33:23 PM
No one knows? I've just tried to flash 551R instead of 551N and got the same problem.

LDRXN
KFMIRL/KFMIOP
KFLDHBN

Are there any other limits?
Is it possible that TCU limits RL?


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: nyet on October 21, 2019, 02:20:16 PM
Ditch CWMDAPP it may have load limit side effects I haven't traced.

Also log milsol and misopl1 if possible.


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: terminator on October 21, 2019, 05:00:53 PM
I already set CWMDAPP to 0 but nothing changed. Now PID works just fine, but I can't control the requested boost.

Also log milsol and misopl1 if possible.
Ok, I will, thanks.



Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: nyet on October 21, 2019, 05:02:09 PM
I already set CWMDAPP to 0 but nothing changed. Now PID works just fine, but I can't control the requested boost.

Please post logs.


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: prj on October 22, 2019, 01:26:00 AM
On ZF5HP I've only ever torque limiters in the RS6 gearbox.

But hey, read out your trans...


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: terminator on November 30, 2019, 10:20:43 AM
I would like to start it from scratch.

I changed only KFLDRL and KFLDIMX. Other N75 maps are fully stock. Now specified and actual pressures are pretty close, but the turbos spool very slow and there are overshoots while gear shifting.
The question is how to make it spool faster? Should I raise IMX? 









Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: nyet on November 30, 2019, 12:26:23 PM
Should I raise IMX? 

Yes.


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: terminator on November 30, 2019, 01:10:46 PM
Like this?


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: nyet on November 30, 2019, 01:48:26 PM
That makes very little sense.


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: terminator on November 30, 2019, 02:25:03 PM
Would you please be more specific? :)
Please take a look. I changed the axis.
 



Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: nyet on November 30, 2019, 02:36:03 PM
Why is it linear? Are you intending to use precontrol?


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: terminator on November 30, 2019, 03:03:41 PM
Yes, I attached KFLDRL one more time.
And I have overshoots here.

 


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: nyet on November 30, 2019, 04:18:58 PM
Something is very wrong, since drl isn't giving you even remotely the dc you need.


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: terminator on November 30, 2019, 10:58:58 PM
May I ask you, what is exactly wrong? 


Title: Re: PID 2.7T Hybrid
Post by: nyet on November 30, 2019, 11:53:25 PM
May I ask you, what is exactly wrong? 

Отправлено с моего Redmi Note 5A Prime через Tapatalk



Seriously?

You're about 20-30 short on dc at the end of spool. How on earth did you get DRL that wrong?