Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Bdm on fgtech 4 med9.1.2  (Read 6307 times)
fgtskofd
Full Member
***

Karma: +0/-13
Offline Offline

Posts: 91


« on: December 29, 2016, 07:02:23 AM »

Hi guys , been trying to bench read a med9.1.1 it's been wired up correctly according the the attached picture , using and adapter we have checked the circuit in and out and all seams well , using pogo pins that are touching the pads correctly. Tried several drivers in the fg tech software the mpc 55x/56x times out , the jtag mpc55x driver works with out the external power being applied and gets to 36 percent and times out, but if the external power is applied then it won't connect at all. Has anyone tried using this tool for bdm mode before ?
Logged
ktm733
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +18/-8
Offline Offline

Posts: 660



« Reply #1 on: December 29, 2016, 09:21:30 PM »

I've used bdm100 for this task. I will try and use galleto to bench mode it with a known good ecu. Tomorrow of course.
Logged
gman86
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +45/-128
Offline Offline

Posts: 705


« Reply #2 on: December 30, 2016, 01:53:53 AM »

Try powering the ECU directly via the pins at the bottom. Ensure +ve and -ve are connected before connecting the galletto physically to the ECU.
Logged
gt-innovation
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +60/-91
Offline Offline

Posts: 449


« Reply #3 on: December 30, 2016, 04:30:53 AM »

Hi guys , been trying to bench read a med9.1.1 it's been wired up correctly according the the attached picture , using and adapter we have checked the circuit in and out and all seams well , using pogo pins that are touching the pads correctly. Tried several drivers in the fg tech software the mpc 55x/56x times out , the jtag mpc55x driver works with out the external power being applied and gets to 36 percent and times out, but if the external power is applied then it won't connect at all. Has anyone tried using this tool for bdm mode before ?

You can easily burn a med9.1 bdm port with bad connections so be carefull.It is always good to use a spring probe in a stable bdm frame.
Logged
fgtskofd
Full Member
***

Karma: +0/-13
Offline Offline

Posts: 91


« Reply #4 on: December 31, 2016, 07:54:15 AM »

Thanks guys for the input appreciate taking the time out to reply . I believe the clone tools the issue waiting on a bdm 100 tool now
Logged
ktm733
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +18/-8
Offline Offline

Posts: 660



« Reply #5 on: December 31, 2016, 10:44:14 PM »

I've ran into a known good ecu that wasn't readable by bdm100. Just a heads up.
Logged
aef
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +69/-46
Offline Offline

Posts: 1598


« Reply #6 on: January 12, 2017, 05:50:57 AM »

I am using a 13,8V Power Supply which is causing alot of problems.
I endet up using LM2596 to play with the voltage.

Dont know if clone related or problem in general. Cry

When bdm writing med9 i sometimes need 3 attempts to reach the 100%.

What voltage at the spring-loaded pins is ideal?
Logged
gman86
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +45/-128
Offline Offline

Posts: 705


« Reply #7 on: January 12, 2017, 05:52:40 AM »

I've ran into a known good ecu that wasn't readable by bdm100. Just a heads up.

Depends on your definition of "known good". If I couldn't read via BDM, I'd say it's not good. There's absolutely nothing you can do, short of physically tampering, to disable BDM reading/writing.
Logged
gman86
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +45/-128
Offline Offline

Posts: 705


« Reply #8 on: January 12, 2017, 05:54:19 AM »

I am using a 13,8V Power Supply which is causing alot of problems.
I endet up using LM2596 to play with the voltage.

Dont know if clone related or problem in general. Cry

When bdm writing med9 i sometimes need 3 attempts to reach the 100%.

What voltage at the spring-loaded pins is ideal?

My Maplin 12V PSU puts out a steady 12.5V and I've yet to encounter an issue read or writing. To get me out of a hole, I've even used a 10V PSU from an old cordless phone that registered 10.2V. Stability is the key.
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.02 seconds with 17 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.001s, 0q)