Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: 1.8T Best turbo Hp / spool wise  (Read 10096 times)
prj
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +1072/-480
Offline Offline

Posts: 6035


« Reply #15 on: December 18, 2022, 05:09:13 AM »

It's not if you like or hate it.
What's the point of building something that is slower than 3.0TDI?
There really isn't.

Use a modern 360-400hp turbo or pick a larger displacement engine.
On the street the 500 or 550hp 1.8T is much slower in 90% cases than a 400hp one.
Once the turbo is way too big it's not enough to be at the RPM anymore, it takes ages to spool even a BB turbo with light shaft. The transient response goes to the dumpster.
« Last Edit: December 18, 2022, 05:10:53 AM by prj » Logged

PM's will not be answered, so don't even try.
Log your car properly - WinOLS database - Tools/patches
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +607/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12268


WWW
« Reply #16 on: December 18, 2022, 12:49:24 PM »

in almost every case, a 1.8t is garbage by modern standards, especially considering how cheap 2.7t blocks are. Why would you bother?
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
Sandstorm3k
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +10/-14
Offline Offline

Posts: 402



« Reply #17 on: December 18, 2022, 02:25:24 PM »

in almost every case, a 1.8t is garbage by modern standards, especially considering how cheap 2.7t blocks are. Why would you bother?
Well, for one. Fun cars for little money. I've got my 1.8 20VT4 up and running and currently busy getting my map right.

With the Haldex, GTX2867R and built engine it definitely gets a smile on my face.
Logged
justinvw2646
Full Member
***

Karma: +17/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 192


« Reply #18 on: December 18, 2022, 03:03:16 PM »

What about making a plate to adapt T3 manifold to the IS38 golf r turbo? Pretty sure its good for at least 30whp more than K04-064 and could be picked up reasonably used??
Logged
prj
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +1072/-480
Offline Offline

Posts: 6035


« Reply #19 on: December 18, 2022, 03:56:11 PM »

What about making a plate to adapt T3 manifold to the IS38 golf r turbo? Pretty sure its good for at least 30whp more than K04-064 and could be picked up reasonably used??
Why not just take the IS38 golf or seat cupra (even cheaper) in the first place? They're not that expensive anymore.
By the time you're done with your 1.8T build, DSG etc, you probably will spend close to as much as it costs...
I'm all for building fun stuff, but when the thing you want literally already exists and it costs about as much as you would spend building it (and it works better), then no point to build.
If you want to swap it into something, there's S18 immo off solution on my site. There's several Mk1 Golfs driving around with that solution and the Golf R motor, and that does 370hp bone stock with just a remap and 500hp with just a turbo upgrade, with acceptable spool. DI and adjustable cams/lift do wonders.

This applies pretty much to every engine. From a certain turbo size it's not usable anymore outside of a straight line with launch control and NLS.
It's a good idea to stop way before that happens, as after that you're making the car feel worse and objectively slower in most situations.
Logged

PM's will not be answered, so don't even try.
Log your car properly - WinOLS database - Tools/patches
justinvw2646
Full Member
***

Karma: +17/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 192


« Reply #20 on: December 18, 2022, 04:27:08 PM »

In the US 2015 Golf R's with north of 100,000 miles on them are priced at least $25k. AWD in a VW car over here is rare and stupid money  Sad     Good to know about the S18 imm off solution though.
Logged
K92
Full Member
***

Karma: +0/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 137


« Reply #21 on: December 19, 2022, 12:01:23 AM »

So looking Garret  compressor maps and keeping in mind 1.8t, it seems to maintain some driveability + alot supporting mods 3076r should be complete maximum.
Logged
fknbrkn
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +185/-23
Offline Offline

Posts: 1454


mk4 1.8T AUM


« Reply #22 on: December 19, 2022, 12:05:36 AM »

So
Whats the point you asking?
Logged
K92
Full Member
***

Karma: +0/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 137


« Reply #23 on: December 19, 2022, 12:37:15 AM »

So
Whats the point you asking?

Discusson.

Logged
_nameless
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +342/-466
Offline Offline

Posts: 2800



« Reply #24 on: December 19, 2022, 02:55:36 AM »

Well... This thread is a total waste of time lol. What a fucking circle jerk.
Logged

Giving your mom a tuneup
K92
Full Member
***

Karma: +0/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 137


« Reply #25 on: December 19, 2022, 03:16:54 AM »

Well... This thread is a total waste of time lol. What a fucking circle jerk.

Well.. One thing is to read compressor maps other thing is experience from other users. If you have nothing to share, whats the point of writing here?

Logged
prj
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +1072/-480
Offline Offline

Posts: 6035


« Reply #26 on: December 19, 2022, 03:37:22 AM »

So looking Garret  compressor maps and keeping in mind 1.8t, it seems to maintain some driveability + alot supporting mods 3076r should be complete maximum.
No it would not be. 3076 on 1.8T is not drivable outside of a straight line. Even on 2.2T it was a little past the limit of what was comfortable.
And why discuss 20 year old turbos?

EFR 6258 or max 6758 for 1.8T. Everything bigger pointless imo.
« Last Edit: December 19, 2022, 03:41:48 AM by prj » Logged

PM's will not be answered, so don't even try.
Log your car properly - WinOLS database - Tools/patches
K92
Full Member
***

Karma: +0/-3
Offline Offline

Posts: 137


« Reply #27 on: December 21, 2022, 01:13:59 AM »

Thank you. Examples were that i was waiting.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.071 seconds with 17 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.005s, 0q)