Pages: 1 2 [3]
Author Topic: LAMFA and ZKLAMFAW  (Read 42569 times)
julex
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +79/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 923


« Reply #30 on: July 10, 2013, 11:41:41 AM »

BTW i don't see that anybody posted the ME7.1 m-box location... i am using 0x1c3ee (hopefully I have it right)

I would like a confirmation on this as well.
Logged
Axis
Full Member
***

Karma: +4/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 91


« Reply #31 on: July 10, 2013, 12:55:47 PM »

0x1c3ee is correct guys.
Logged
phila_dot
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +174/-11
Offline Offline

Posts: 1709


« Reply #32 on: July 10, 2013, 01:49:57 PM »

0x1c3ee is correct guys.

Confirmation confirmed
Logged
tao13
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +918/-962
Online Online

Posts: 503


« Reply #33 on: February 12, 2021, 12:03:46 PM »

I know is an old topic but i need ZKLAMFAW address for 8N0906018H  0004.
I have defined in 0x1C9EA with lohi and conversion 0.001525902*x with value 16.7.
Is it correct value, correct address?
Logged
tao13
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +918/-962
Online Online

Posts: 503


« Reply #34 on: February 15, 2021, 10:19:26 AM »

NOBODY can help me with some advice for upstairs request???
Logged
ar4er07
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 9


« Reply #35 on: February 15, 2021, 01:23:02 PM »

Upload your firmware, I'll see it
Logged
tao13
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +918/-962
Online Online

Posts: 503


« Reply #36 on: February 15, 2021, 01:25:47 PM »

here....
Logged
quattro85
Full Member
***

Karma: +3/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 79


« Reply #37 on: October 12, 2023, 09:28:57 AM »

I know this is pretty old tread, but I found in one full map pack nice conversion for (KF)ZKLAMFAW.
So if you'd like to look at it like in seconds filtering, put reciprocal factor of 3276.8

If you prefer to see it like percentage change per cycle, than phila_dot factor (100/65535 = 0.0015259) is nice.
Logged
ssullivan
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 1


« Reply #38 on: August 21, 2025, 08:53:20 AM »

The filter is basically:

current value + ((|new value - current value|)*constant)

I know this is an ancient thread, but this formula HAS to be wrong: Because of the absolute value, the parenthesis will always be positive so you would always lean out even if requesting a rich mixture.

ex:  1 + (| 0.8 - 1 |) *1
       1 + (| -0.2 |) *1
       1 + (0.2) *1
       =1.2

I assume it is correct if we remove the absolute value as that would give the expected result.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.024 seconds with 17 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0s, 0q)