nupustas
Full Member
Karma: +3/-12
 Offline
Posts: 122
|
 |
« Reply #105 on: May 16, 2021, 09:50:53 PM »
|
|
|
Original 1,8t 225hp maf has plastic frame+steel grid, which means crossection is smaller than S6 maf(instaled only steel grid), see attached picture. When rescaling MAF, should i have evalute area of plastic frame, or just measured inner diameters?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #106 on: May 17, 2021, 12:07:10 PM »
|
|
|
Always ID Air does not flow through solid plastic  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
ME7.1 tuning guideECUx PlotME7Sum checksumTrim heatmap toolPlease do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own. Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
|
|
|
nupustas
Full Member
Karma: +3/-12
Offline
Posts: 122
|
|
« Reply #107 on: May 18, 2021, 05:29:01 AM »
|
|
|
Sorry for my english(it's not my native language), maybe not cleary asked. That i wanted to say: BAM maf (left picture) has aditional plastic frame inside maf, which means real cross section area is smaller than identical ID tube cross section area (as you wrote - "Air does not flow through solid plastic"). Im going to instal new maf without plastic frame, so rescaling only by ID works fine and difference by plastic frame will not affect anything?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
BlackT
|
|
« Reply #108 on: May 18, 2021, 06:53:54 AM »
|
|
|
Sorry for my english(it's not my native language), maybe not cleary asked. That i wanted to say: BAM maf (left picture) has aditional plastic frame inside maf, which means real cross section area is smaller than identical ID tube cross section area (as you wrote - "Air does not flow through solid plastic"). Im going to instal new maf without plastic frame, so rescaling only by ID works fine and difference by plastic frame will not affect anything?
Few mm +- will not make any harm. Don't bother with that |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
nupustas
Full Member
Karma: +3/-12
Offline
Posts: 122
|
|
« Reply #109 on: May 19, 2021, 10:08:51 AM »
|
|
|
thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
mate96
Newbie
Karma: +0/-1
Offline
Posts: 1
|
 |
« Reply #110 on: October 05, 2023, 12:24:20 AM »
|
|
|
Hey, How can i get this script? arturbrojek@gmail.com |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
marantzvieta
Full Member
Karma: +3/-5
Offline
Posts: 95
|
|
« Reply #111 on: November 04, 2024, 09:46:33 AM »
|
|
|
Hi all,
Fisrt of all I want to thank everybody involved in the creation of this tool. Waiting for hardware to test the results in the car but looks great.
I am converting from a 1.8t AEB maf (67mm ID measured) to a VR6 ABV maf (78mm ID measured). 35.53% cross section area increase.
The program does it's job correctly, but when comparing the rescale file obtained with the program, to the map in a stock vr6 file, there is a discrepancy in the maximum reading possible:
- Rescaled maf file shows max 912.63kg/h
- Stock oem VR6 files show max reading 988.5kg/h
I assume this has to do something with the reverse flow capabilites of 1.8t maf that VR6 does not have. I also read it may have to do with the offset in VR6 map (0) and the offset in 1.8t map (-200).
Does somebody know or can confirm, just for knowledge, the reason this discrepancy between the rescaled map and OEM map happens?
Thank you so much. Best regards!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ngt84
Newbie
Karma: +0/-2
Offline
Posts: 7
|
|
« Reply #112 on: November 09, 2024, 03:26:01 AM »
|
|
|
Why this original exe file gives a positive for malware ?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ngt84
Newbie
Karma: +0/-2
Offline
Posts: 7
|
|
« Reply #113 on: November 09, 2024, 03:27:01 AM »
|
|
|
Discovery was made 2020.
Here is the twitter post by the guy who discoreved it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
marantzvieta
Full Member
Karma: +3/-5
Offline
Posts: 95
|
|
« Reply #114 on: November 09, 2024, 11:11:31 AM »
|
|
|
Discovery was made 2020.
Here is the twitter post by the guy who discoreved it.
Can you develop a bit please? From what I read maybe even the creator of the file may not know, the code is publicly available and mazer has been a good contributor to this forum. Thanks mate |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Andy.G
Newbie
Karma: +0/-1
Offline
Posts: 9
|
|
« Reply #115 on: January 15, 2025, 12:41:46 PM »
|
|
|
My virus program is also seeing the file as a threat. But I guess it's safe to use?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
evolve
Jr. Member
Karma: +2/-1
Offline
Posts: 26
|
|
« Reply #116 on: January 26, 2025, 11:52:22 PM »
|
|
|
Just found and tried I was amazed it worked fine for me. ME7.01
Found, adjusted 3.79% and appears to have scaled corectly. going up in size by 1.55mm its a very minor difference nothing drasticly out of place.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
_nameless
|
|
« Reply #117 on: August 06, 2026, 12:58:09 PM »
|
|
|
I fixed some bugs, made it a gui rewritten in python source and compiled files on git https://github.com/ugtuner05-sys/me7mafadjust |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
UGT Performance | ME7.5 calibration editor, flasher & logger Audi A4 B6 1.8T (early + late) · AWV / AWP / AWW · VR6 in beta and 07K in progress BMW N54, N55, F & G Series, ZF8 calibration editors https://UGTuner.xyz/ |
|
|
|
