Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 4B0906018DQ issue with RL/rlmax  (Read 6082 times)
em.Euro.R18
Full Member
***

Karma: +4/-5
Offline Offline

Posts: 219


« on: October 28, 2014, 01:22:39 PM »

rl and rlmax are stuck round 130% load. So I've adjusted KFMIOP load axis and last columns appropriately (rl should be 165%ish). LDRXN has been adjusted for 170% rlmax. raised HBN as necessary. Finally found LDIATA I'll give zero'ing that a shot next but I have a feeling theres something else at play here. Possibly KFMLDMX? but I've tryed searching comparing a "DC" defined binary's DMX values within 20% and nothing is found. The pattern doesn't seem to match anyone on the DQ (some where close but didn't make sense). This file seems like a complete mess compared to every other layout I've seen. I'm keeping the tune a bit conservative and its a rough start to make this a MAX MPG tune for daily driving.

Log and bin file attached
Logged
em.Euro.R18
Full Member
***

Karma: +4/-5
Offline Offline

Posts: 219


« Reply #1 on: October 28, 2014, 01:26:29 PM »

log file
Logged
em.Euro.R18
Full Member
***

Karma: +4/-5
Offline Offline

Posts: 219


« Reply #2 on: October 28, 2014, 03:25:13 PM »

The layout of this binary is all over the place it seems, can I or would I just be better off flashing this ecu to 8E0909518AK? I wouldn't need to code the immobilizer would I?
Logged
ddillenger
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +641/-21
Offline Offline

Posts: 5640


« Reply #3 on: October 28, 2014, 03:49:10 PM »

The layout of this binary is all over the place it seems, can I or would I just be better off flashing this ecu to 8E0909518AK? I wouldn't need to code the immobilizer would I?

Wait till you realize MLHFM........
Logged

Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!

Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com

Email>PM
em.Euro.R18
Full Member
***

Karma: +4/-5
Offline Offline

Posts: 219


« Reply #4 on: October 29, 2014, 08:18:55 AM »

So I've searched all over for the MLHFM map in the binary in 2D mode and nothing matches a defined "DC" bin.  Shocked..... I have no idea why I can't find this 512x1 map. Either way why would the MAF scaler be the limiting factor? Maf is stock.
Logged
em.Euro.R18
Full Member
***

Karma: +4/-5
Offline Offline

Posts: 219


« Reply #5 on: October 29, 2014, 10:37:32 AM »



Pattern I could find and its not even close. Unless your telling me MLHFM is messed up somehow.
Logged
ddillenger
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +641/-21
Offline Offline

Posts: 5640


« Reply #6 on: October 29, 2014, 01:35:19 PM »

I was just saying it's a weird binary.

Have you found KFTARX? Do you have any logs?
Logged

Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!

Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com

Email>PM
em.Euro.R18
Full Member
***

Karma: +4/-5
Offline Offline

Posts: 219


« Reply #7 on: October 29, 2014, 03:02:25 PM »

KFTARX - 29728 just found it that could be an issue I'll test changes to that

I attached log in csv on the second post
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.016 seconds with 18 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.001s, 0q)