Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: Me7.5 tuning strategy.  (Read 13708 times)
jjuuaannk
Full Member
***

Karma: +1/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 89



« Reply #15 on: May 24, 2018, 06:53:08 PM »

It should be 1,001
Logged

Leon Cupra R 1M
ashleymark
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 12


« Reply #16 on: May 25, 2018, 01:46:59 AM »

Thats the impression i was under, but mine is full of 1.9923. I think its juat a factor/offset issue but cant seem to find out what factors i should be using. Mine looks like the top picture that RBPE posted.

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

Logged
ashleymark
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 12


« Reply #17 on: May 25, 2018, 02:17:46 AM »

Here are properties I have.
Thanks
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +608/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12270


WWW
« Reply #18 on: May 25, 2018, 08:45:36 AM »

If I had to to guess, it is just regions where lamfa will be totally ignored, since target AFR is the minimum of several different inputs, none of the others ever being that lean.
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
ashleymark
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 12


« Reply #19 on: May 25, 2018, 09:55:36 AM »

Thanks for reply nyet. I dont think i understand what you mean. Are you saying that lamfa map i have is correct and i should modify the 1.9923 values?


Its just my lamfa is pretty much full of 1.9923's. Its only the 100% column that has data that looks like a lamfa map.
Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

« Last Edit: May 25, 2018, 09:58:30 AM by ashleymark » Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +608/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12270


WWW
« Reply #20 on: May 25, 2018, 10:07:53 AM »

I think the LAMFA section in the s4wiki does a pretty good job answering both of those questions....

In short, preemptive enrichment, which is really only needed WOT
« Last Edit: May 25, 2018, 10:15:28 AM by nyet » Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
RBPE
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +40/-5
Offline Offline

Posts: 395



« Reply #21 on: May 25, 2018, 12:51:12 PM »

Only had a quick look but these 512kb files are interesting to say the least!

DLAMKR is set at that figure, 1.99, so it's purposeful if that "hi" file is stock as yours matches it.

The maps you've said are right and that is your file I posted earlier but I used a 1mb file to define it, if your axis numbers are muddled up simply change the rl axis lo/hi<>hi/lo (x on mine, poss y on others).

It also goes lean at max nmot/rl compared with earlier across the line so plenty for you to be getting on with really there.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.021 seconds with 17 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.001s, 0q)