|
Rick
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: September 23, 2010, 01:09:00 PM »
|
|
|
You can thank me for getting him to come over lol....
Spen,
I take it this has the issue with orphan axis as my C box output?
Rick
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
spen
Full Member
Karma: +43/-0
 Offline
Posts: 112
|
|
« Reply #16 on: September 23, 2010, 04:02:43 PM »
|
|
|
Yeah, the axes need to be looked at independently. I've got the basics of each axis covered, but as far as building an xdf it requires a little manual thought.
I will sort out the axis problem in time, then I'll be able to recreate any ME7 object given a lead address in any ME7 binary in xdf format.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
phila_dot
|
|
« Reply #17 on: September 23, 2010, 08:11:31 PM »
|
|
|
Thanks alot. You went above and beyond. I can't wait to get home and implement this. Your PM box is going to fill up quick.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
spen
Full Member
Karma: +43/-0
Offline
Posts: 112
|
|
« Reply #18 on: September 24, 2010, 02:27:36 AM »
|
|
|
Let me know how you get on with those offsets and winols.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
phila_dot
|
|
« Reply #19 on: October 01, 2010, 12:26:52 AM »
|
|
|
Spen and all concerned,
I was out of town for a few days so I have not been able to try these out until tonight. I have only just started tonight and gotten a few done. So far all of the offsets with axis information listed that I have done have been accurate. I have found that every address so far has required this axis information, however some had a zero. I greatly appreciate your contribution. Once I get through it all I intend to publish an xdf and possibly a DAMOS file as well. Have you found a solution to the zeros from the axis information feature? Great work regardless. Will this software ever be made available? Thank you.
Example Actual Address
Table: target load KFMIRL,60,0x811950 // 0x81198C
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
spen
Full Member
Karma: +43/-0
Offline
Posts: 112
|
|
« Reply #20 on: October 01, 2010, 03:39:12 AM »
|
|
|
Thanks for the feedback. I will fix the axis problem that much I do know.
The software I have written can already do an xdf export, though it still requires the axis information to be manually discovered.
I have been working quite hard on pulling together a list of ram addresses, hence no axis fix.
The stuff I have written is unlikely to ever be published, only the output. The primary reason is that it can be used to break immos, show the impact of changes in a tuning company's work and hence can be used to cause harm and economic damage. I'm quite happy to evolve the software as my personal hobby and share a lot of the output.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Rick
|
|
« Reply #21 on: October 01, 2010, 04:53:01 AM »
|
|
|
Spen has created a Motronic Jailbreak lol
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
phila_dot
|
|
« Reply #22 on: October 01, 2010, 05:29:24 PM »
|
|
|
Any way to have the axis information dynamically add to the the offset? Is this practical?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
A4Nick
Newbie
Karma: +1/-0
Offline
Posts: 13
|
|
« Reply #23 on: October 22, 2010, 10:07:27 AM »
|
|
|
Will all of those addresses and definitions be different from my 2000 a4 1.8t? or will the definitions of the map be the same and the adress be different? Sorry if this question has been covered already im new to this but it seems like it would make since to me. For example engine load is KXDFKJ (not actual id just saying) for the s4 wouldn't it be the same for the 1.8t? thanks guys
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Rick
|
|
« Reply #24 on: October 22, 2010, 11:47:00 AM »
|
|
|
The definitions will be the same, but addresses will be different.
Rick
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
A4Nick
Newbie
Karma: +1/-0
Offline
Posts: 13
|
|
« Reply #25 on: October 22, 2010, 01:04:26 PM »
|
|
|
Ok so for example for the m box according to the definitions posted earlier
MAF linearization (MLHFM),0,0x810d74
Now on my a4 maf linearization would still be MLHFM correct? and the adress would be listed next to that as well but different numbers from above? forgive me if im not making sense i haven't extracted my bin file quite yet.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Rick
|
|
« Reply #26 on: October 22, 2010, 02:46:44 PM »
|
|
|
yes, thats correct
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
A4Nick
Newbie
Karma: +1/-0
Offline
Posts: 13
|
|
« Reply #27 on: October 22, 2010, 05:38:09 PM »
|
|
|
Alright awesome, thanks for the help and hopefully ill be contributing back sometime soon  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
