Pages: [1]
Author Topic: M3.2-M3.8-M5.4-M5.9-Binary-to-asm-Project  (Read 1002 times)
ecuprog7
Full Member
***

Karma: +8/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 76


« on: February 24, 2026, 07:20:22 AM »

Hi
I´ve done some more work on the old 87C196KR. I made a parser to generate asm files from a binary of the M3.2, M3.8, M5.4, M5.9.
Project is with sybmols to Jumps and Calls so just make changes and hit compile, rl96 and compiler script will do the magic for segment references.
Segment Jumps are detected but backjumps can be wrong. Data parsing is not done by now.
Checksums are also not done. Any information about checksum calculation on these old ecus would be nice.
https://github.com/EcuProg7/M3.2-M3.8-M5.4-M5.9-Binary-to-asm-Project
« Last Edit: February 24, 2026, 07:26:36 AM by ecuprog7 » Logged
_nameless
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +373/-3439
Offline Offline

Posts: 2986



« Reply #1 on: February 25, 2026, 08:25:20 PM »

Forked
https://github.com/ugtuner05-sys/UGT-MOTRONIC-DISASSEMBLER/releases/tag/UGT
Logged

If you are broke or expecting free handouts DO NOT message me. I'll probably put you on blast if you do.
eliotroyano
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +48/-12
Offline Offline

Posts: 837


« Reply #2 on: March 18, 2026, 11:32:20 AM »

Hi. Nice to see some work/projects with that old Motronics.....
Logged
overspeed
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +21/-5
Offline Offline

Posts: 403



« Reply #3 on: March 18, 2026, 12:02:05 PM »

Would be REALLY nice if someone could make it speed density instead of MAF based.

it´s a  pain in the ass to find original MAF sensor nowdays
Logged
error1997
Newbie
*

Karma: +3/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 23


« Reply #4 on: March 18, 2026, 12:05:25 PM »

Would be REALLY nice if someone could make it speed density instead of MAF based.

it´s a  pain in the ass to find original MAF sensor nowdays
I just put one HFM5, calibrate it, fine tune with 2-3 files and its done.
Logged
eliotroyano
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +48/-12
Offline Offline

Posts: 837


« Reply #5 on: March 18, 2026, 12:10:47 PM »

Would be REALLY nice if someone could make it speed density instead of MAF based.
it´s a  pain in the ass to find original MAF sensor nowdays

Hi Junior, maybe I am dreaming but add wideband O2 support to that speed density idea and you have a nice, simple and robust ECU that could control big projects too.
Logged
overspeed
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +21/-5
Offline Offline

Posts: 403



« Reply #6 on: March 18, 2026, 12:23:59 PM »

I just put one HFM5, calibrate it, fine tune with 2-3 files and its done.

Did it sometimes in the past, but even those MAF are getting difficult do find, and cost are rising in my country

Hi Junior, maybe I am dreaming but add wideband O2 support to that speed density idea and you have a nice, simple and robust ECU that could control big projects too.

Don´t think there is the necessary HW on those to run a Wideband sensor
Logged
eliotroyano
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +48/-12
Offline Offline

Posts: 837


« Reply #7 on: March 18, 2026, 12:28:01 PM »

Did it sometimes in the past, but even those MAF are getting difficult do find, and cost are rising in my country
Don´t think there is the necessary HW on those to run a Wideband sensor

5V signal from a WB controller going into some ECU input.
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.018 seconds with 18 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0s, 0q)