ok, been studying, read the wiki, read the threads on base boost. Moved some maps around and got some mild results but I am still not changing cells with intention based on 2 or more variable feedback.
LDRPLS:
OEM throttle body so KFWDKMSN, KFMSNWDK stock.
Garrett GT2860RS so LDRPLS needs tuning.
One hardware issue I need to iron out: I welded a Tial MVS-A WG flange to my turbine and the hole I cut in the turbine is too small. I'll need to dremel out the hole to eliminate boost creep which is a bit dramatic.
These maps are based on spring "cracking pressure" and are less concerned or sensitive to what occurs after 0% WGDC correct or am I wrong about that?
WG spring is 5 psi tial which should be the same pressure as 1.8T AWP K03s.
On to WDKUGDN, KFVPDKSD, KFVPDKSE:
Increased WDKUGDN to match msdk_w to mshfm_w which has gotten better. I need to fine tune it a bit more in the low RPM zones but aside from just tweaking until they match, I'm not sure if there is a formula I can use to propagate the cells with. also, it seems a bit lumpy, not sure if smoothing is appropriate.
KFVPDKSD/E I based on the base boost curve from pvdks but PRJ says:
All that is needed is measure base boost and fill the tables correctly, to make sure that the throttle is used for filling control where plsol < base boost and the N75 used with the throttle slammed open where plsol > base boost.
but on WOT plsol is always above pvdks (so is vpssplg_w). Maybe I need to log part throttle and tune based on that?
compared 032HS to 551R, 551M, 018H and a few others which are all very different.
I converted base boost to pressure ratio (PSI+14.69)/14.69=PR then limited where I put .956 KFVPDKSD/E based on where the PR coincides with RPM and propagated KFVPDKSD/E like that. I'm unsure if that's the appropriate way to do it or if I'm basing it on the right variables of if there is also a formula you can use to fill the cells.
Also, best practices: blend from .956->1.015 (EX: .956, .966, .984, 1.015)?
or just .956, 1.015 ?