Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Location of LDRXN on S4 2001.5 2.7T L-Box  (Read 5871 times)
conradz
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 7


« on: November 24, 2014, 12:29:16 PM »

I'm trying to make a tune for my 2001.5 S4 with tiptronic and L-Box ECU. I was trying to modify the LDRXN table, but it doesn't seem to make any difference. I saw in another post about the 551R box that it has 2 different LDRXN tables, one for auto and one for manual. Is this true for the L-Box (which always has auto trans) also? I'm using an M-box xdf file that only has LDRXN_1_A defined, so I'm assuming I need to edit the LDRXN_0_A table. If this is the case I would like to know the location of the table.

Some background: I'm logging using me7logger and get a max rlmx_w of ~140. rlmax_w never goes above 130, which limits rlsol_w to < 130 also. In s4wiki it says that rlmax is limited by KFTARX, but I have set all values in the range I'm targetting to 1 for all temps, so it shouldn't be that. rlmax_w never seems to budge when modifying LDRXN_1_A, so I'm pretty sure the problem is that I have the wrong table location. I can send my bin file if that would help.

Any help is appreciated as I'm a bit of a noob at this.
Logged
ddillenger
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +641/-21
Offline Offline

Posts: 5640


« Reply #1 on: November 24, 2014, 02:47:54 PM »

There is only one Smiley

Read the community thread, post!
Logged

Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!

Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com

Email>PM
conradz
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 7


« Reply #2 on: November 24, 2014, 07:17:24 PM »

Good to know, apparently that isn't my problem then. But somehow it appears that rlmax is not following LDRXN at all.

Are you saying I should post this problem on the Community Project: Stage 1 2.7T S4 thread? I read over the whole thread and couldn't find anything relating to my issue. I found the thread pretty convoluted to follow also, but I can try if you think that would be the correct place to start.
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +608/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12271


WWW
« Reply #3 on: November 24, 2014, 11:17:20 PM »

HBN...
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
conradz
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 7


« Reply #4 on: November 25, 2014, 01:05:26 PM »

Pretty sure it's not HBN, although I could be missing something. I'm setting LDRXN to be ~160, which as I understand it should not hit HBN. I also tried the NVR Stage 2++ map for KFLDHBN and it still gives the same result. No matter what I do rlmax won't go above ~120.

I'm starting to think maybe it's a problem with a sensor, but it's really weird since the MIL isn't on and a regular OBDII scanner doesn't find any codes. Somehow NefMoto picks up P1548, P1453, P0333, P1131, and P1457, which are relating to EGT and O2 sensors. I deleted and disabled the SAI and disabled the rear O2. I am also running the 2.0T coil packs with the associated tune changes.

Anybody have any ideas? Why would NefMoto pick up DTCs that I can't find with other readers?
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +608/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12271


WWW
« Reply #5 on: November 25, 2014, 01:08:27 PM »

Post logs please...

including ldrlms_w and ldrlts_w
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
conradz
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 7


« Reply #6 on: November 25, 2014, 01:34:32 PM »

OK, here is a log from ME7Logger including those variables. You can see rlmx going above 160 but rlmax stays at < 120.
Logged
conradz
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 7


« Reply #7 on: November 25, 2014, 01:37:34 PM »

Oops, forgot to attach the file. Here it is.
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +608/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12271


WWW
« Reply #8 on: November 25, 2014, 10:25:11 PM »

Looks like req load is following ldrlms (from LDPBN), which means B_brlmx is set...

I'd get VCDS and do a proper scan for codes.

From the FR:

Quote
Mittels der Systemkonstanten SY_TFMO, SY_GGGTS werden die ¨Oltemperatur (toel) bzw. die K¨uhlwassertemperatur vom Kombiinstrument
(tmki) ¨uber Sensoren eingelesen, deren Signal in %GGTOL bzw. %GGGTS ausgewertet wird. Stehen die entsrechenden Gr¨oßen am CAN
zur verf¨ugung (tolc bzw. tmkic) wird auf die CAN-Gr¨oßen, bzw. im Fehlerfall auf Ersatzwerte umgeschaltet.
Im Falle eines erkannter Systemfehlers tritt eine zus¨atzliche n-abh¨angige (Druck-) Begrenzung (LDPBN) in Kraft, die analog zur
H¨ohenbegrenzung auf F¨ullungsebene umgerechnet wird. Das Zur¨uckschalten erfolgt nur bei resetiertem Ausl¨osefehler und Leerlaufbetrieb
(B_ll).

Looks like if the instrument cluster detects an error in coolant or oil temps, B_brlmx is set.

Don't bother doing any further tuning until you get rid of ALL your codes. Period. You're asking for trouble if you are doing this w/o VCDS...
« Last Edit: November 25, 2014, 10:33:01 PM by nyet » Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.023 seconds with 17 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.001s, 0q)