Im currently looking into the differences in various 1.2 tdi maps, edc15p+, from lupo 3l and audi a2

I cant find a reason for different N75 duty cycles between AYZ and ANY (up to 5% at 3000rpm and 20mg iq)
Both engines use exactly the same turbocharger and actuator rod (looked up partnumbers in ETKA)

019AE, 019AA, 019K, 019BC as were in the Lupo 3l have higher DC's maps (right picture)
019D, 019BL as were in the Audi a2 3l al have lower DC's (left picture)

My question is: why??

Lol Here are some files. Could be, but boost target maps, torque limiters and
injection duration maps are identical....

You realize the same man likely didn't develop both calibrations?

I understand. But will this influence boost development in a noticable manner, or are the differences too small to notice

I made a good file 82hp/196nm (tested) for BL, and now want to tune the AE
Transfered al tuning related maps (torque, smoke, boost and duration maps) to the AE file,
because stock AE was te same stock D/BL file, except for N75 DC.
Would it be better to stick with AE duty cycles, or use the ones for the D/BL, if there is any noticable difference after all.

Ok thank you. So i assume both might be ok to use in a mild stage 1 tune