Essesse versions for example has a 300Kpa MAP 0281002437.

It is probably because of one of the load or turbine compressor limiters that this ECU has plenty of. What ECU definition are you using? Post the bin, I might be able to help you (but just _might_).

Answer to the request. It is possible to find, but you would have to register on a couple of foreign speaking forums.

Can't help you with your particular binaries, they do not match any of my definitions (and I do not have that many), even after chopping a 64K block out (0x8000-0x18000) that is normally not included on readouts from this ECU (BTW, which program read this binary out?). Nice to have a new binary, haven't seen this one before

But, below a shot of a handful of maps from my Abarth bin that I believe could be the ones that you should look for. I am quite certain that this is not complete, but these are some obvious candidates. Most of them sit in the BGRLMX module, two in MDRLMAX (the two torque limiters, these you have probably not missed), and one in BGPVD (but this one I believe is irrelevant). Something tells me there was one more scalar value somewhere, but I cannot recall what it was at the moment, will re-post when I do. Hope that helps a tiny bit.

robotchip, first off, your "abarth.ori" file isn't stock.... second, maybe you should take a look at all the maps you've modified, some values don't make much sense vs others... Also, you've (inadvertently) redimensioned at least ONE map, which makes me wonder how your car even runs...

I have to question the stock-dness of your ori file too, the checksum does not add up, see attachments. I named and reorganised your files so that they have the more common layout and are more likely to fit existing definitions if anybody else wants to have a look at it.

I am worried about you talking about scaling the MAP sensor. If these are 3bar MAP sensors (which I believe they should be in a 180 hp version) then you should not be touching any MAP sensor scaling. (But you should also not be trying to go with boost up to 2 bar, you should have a margin to let the regulation do its job). If it is a 2.5 bar MAP sensor and you are trying to push the boost to 2 bar by "scaling" things, then I am afraid this has little chance of success.

And yes, the diagnostics will only show you 2560 mbar capped value for the intake pressure, but you can see that the load is calculated properly and goes above that (from what I can see).

Hello,
I'm sorry to have bad named the files and not checksummed the mod but my tool calculate checksum only in writing.
I summarize the problem to make understand all, i think it will be useful to study a solution for who have to tune similar car with strong mechanical modification.
The Car is 500 abarth 180 hp with bigger turbocharger TD04HL;
Map sensors are 300kPa (stock are so) and they don't need to be recalibrate;
With attached mod file  the boost requested doesn't reach 300 kPa even if map sensors can read properly 300kPa.
We need to know how this ecu calculate load/boost requested so that we can calibrate boost without problem.
I have seen Revlimit had done  gpa over 400 hp with more than 300kPa boost and stock ecu.
I hope it will be useful to study for all.

Thanks to tell me the mistake, you are right, the file isn't the correct stock  ! i'm sorry, however, few days ago i did some other tests on Grande Punto SS 180 hp to see if it is possible to get 300kPa desidered boost (this car has 300kPa Map sensor from the factory).
Attached you will find stock file, test file and the screenshot of the log.
I'm afraid that it isn't possible to have 300kPa desidered boost without install a new MAP sensor with full scale 350 kPa..