if he were to change to a HPX PMAS and run it in blow though would that not help with this problem?
Of course not. How would that possibly change the ECU's failure understand >100 load?
Bottom line: adding FI to an NA ECU is a lot of work and CANNOT BE DONE by just twiddling a few maps.
It is utter folly.
I have no fucking clue how many times we have to say the same thing. It is one thing to be able to quickly learn to DIY a few simple map changes. It is a whole other thing to learn how to write custom code for an ECU you barely understand.
If you dont even know what LOAD is, how can you possibly expect to be able to patch the ENTIRE load path of the ECU, in assembly, without source code?
Those on this forum who know how to help you, will not help you with this.
It is not even this; it is a purely practical matter: training somebody to do this is a shitload of work and would likely take weeks if not months of handholding and explanations, and unless the student is already familiar with assembly and embedded systems in general, not even that is possible.
To complicate matters even further, a proper logging system would still need to be created, from scratch, that can log arbitrary RAM locations.