Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 7
Author Topic: vw AWP 1.8t ko4xl power cut issue  (Read 65478 times)
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +604/-166
Offline Offline

Posts: 12229


WWW
« Reply #30 on: July 19, 2016, 11:30:12 PM »

FT F21 CLONE. I USED THE K04-023XL AND IT WAS OK.

I CAN BARELY HEAR YOU
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide (READ FIRST)
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum checker/corrrector for ME7.x

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience.
vwmaniac
Full Member
***

Karma: +8/-5
Offline Offline

Posts: 167


« Reply #31 on: July 20, 2016, 05:28:29 PM »

req boost is well below the MAP limit, which is why he's seeing throttle cut IIRC.

so he really needs to INCREASE ldrxn and cut a ton of WGDC
so I have increase ldrxn to 255 and set wgdc to 75% on both maps and requested boost never meets actual. What am I doing wrong?
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +604/-166
Offline Offline

Posts: 12229


WWW
« Reply #32 on: July 20, 2016, 05:45:52 PM »

so I have increase ldrxn to 255 and set wgdc to 75% on both maps and requested boost never meets actual. What am I doing wrong?

Impossible to say w/o looking at the logs, but until you learn more about PIDs it will be very hard to spoon feed this side of tuning.
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide (READ FIRST)
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum checker/corrrector for ME7.x

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience.
vwmaniac
Full Member
***

Karma: +8/-5
Offline Offline

Posts: 167


« Reply #33 on: July 20, 2016, 06:45:34 PM »

I'll post logs tomorrow as I'm away from my computer rite now, and I will read thru the wiki more
Logged
vwmaniac
Full Member
***

Karma: +8/-5
Offline Offline

Posts: 167


« Reply #34 on: July 21, 2016, 06:25:38 AM »

here is the latest log. im thinking i may need to increase kfmiop and kfmirl
Logged
adam-
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +122/-33
Offline Offline

Posts: 2177


« Reply #35 on: July 21, 2016, 06:54:30 AM »

Barely any boost until 3.2k on a K04 sucks.   Why is engine load so low?  Duty is flat out so either leaks/dead turbo.
Logged
nubcake
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +53/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 401


« Reply #36 on: July 21, 2016, 07:48:28 AM »

ps_w is so very low. MAF readings and msdk_w are all over the place. Throttle cut after ~5200 RPM.
Lower the DIMX even more in 3500+ RPM zone.
Is your MAF properly scaled? If it is - double-check DV.
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +604/-166
Offline Offline

Posts: 12229


WWW
« Reply #37 on: July 21, 2016, 10:05:44 AM »

here is the latest log. im thinking i may need to increase kfmiop and kfmirl

Absolutely the last thing you should do. I have zero idea why you think this is at all the case.

ps_w is crazy low, so either your MAF is horribly underscaled or you have a gigantic post maf pre turbo inlet leak.

Spool is incredibly lazy for a K04. Even if we disregard that:

Your LDRXN is still too low, and DIMX is still way too high, or Q2 is way too low, or both.

The whole log is an utter mess, from start to finish.

It isn't clear at all you understand anything from the tuning page, let alone the FR, especially if you think (for some bizarre reason) KFMIRL and IOP have anything to do with the problems you're seeing.
« Last Edit: July 21, 2016, 10:10:59 AM by nyet » Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide (READ FIRST)
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum checker/corrrector for ME7.x

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience.
yxx499
Full Member
***

Karma: +4/-10
Offline Offline

Posts: 106


« Reply #38 on: July 23, 2016, 01:31:29 AM »

Best way is to use an MBC to not kill turbo/rods with big overboost. Then u can set a desired boost wich will be limited by mbc..
Logged
IamwhoIam
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +43/-99
Offline Offline

Posts: 1028


« Reply #39 on: July 23, 2016, 02:55:37 AM »

LOL best way is to double and triple and quadruple-check that the car is mechanically sound, and that there are no leaks. But yeah, most people will just say "yeah I've tightened up all the clamps, it's air tight" so what can you expect?
Logged

I have no logs because I have a boost gauge (makes things easier)
adam-
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +122/-33
Offline Offline

Posts: 2177


« Reply #40 on: July 23, 2016, 03:11:53 AM »

Best way is to use an MBC to not kill turbo/rods with big overboost. Then u can set a desired boost wich will be limited by mbc..


Or you can tune it properly?
Logged
_nameless
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +319/-444
Offline Offline

Posts: 2648



« Reply #41 on: July 23, 2016, 04:39:10 AM »

Or you can tune it properly?
x2
Logged

If you are in the market for a tune and would like the ease of downloading and flashing a dyno tested tune for a fair price check out https://instatune.sellfy.store/
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +604/-166
Offline Offline

Posts: 12229


WWW
« Reply #42 on: July 23, 2016, 09:01:48 AM »

Best way is to use an MBC to not kill turbo/rods with big overboost. Then u can set a desired boost wich will be limited by mbc..


FFS

No.

Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide (READ FIRST)
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum checker/corrrector for ME7.x

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience.
vwmaniac
Full Member
***

Karma: +8/-5
Offline Offline

Posts: 167


« Reply #43 on: July 24, 2016, 03:02:38 PM »

i did a smoke test and there are no leaks, tried the mbc would rather have the n75 there. also for my maf housing i used a 24v vr6 sensor and housing with these maps copied from same file 022 906 032 bm
-MLHFM
-MLOFS
-KFMLDMN
-KFMLDMNX
-KFKHFM
is that correct or is that also wrong...
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +604/-166
Offline Offline

Posts: 12229


WWW
« Reply #44 on: July 24, 2016, 03:08:18 PM »

i did a smoke test and there are no leaks, tried the mbc would rather have the n75 there. also for my maf housing i used a 24v vr6 sensor and housing with these maps copied from same file 022 906 032 bm
-MLHFM
-MLOFS
-KFMLDMN
-KFMLDMNX
-KFKHFM
is that correct or is that also wrong...

Unless you are intentionally underscaling the MAF, yes, something is wrong.
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide (READ FIRST)
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum checker/corrrector for ME7.x

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience.
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 7
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.023 seconds with 17 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0s, 0q)