Pages: [1]
Author Topic: RS6 generally stock file, large timing pull  (Read 7319 times)
AARDQ
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +11/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 338


« on: September 01, 2016, 08:42:04 AM »

Getting started sorting out my RS6, re-flashed with 4d1907558 (no suffix).  KFLDHBN has been raised to deal with the 6,200' altitude (but should still result in on-curve operation). Apparently a decent-sized boost leak I need to track down, but more worrisome is what's up with the timing pull I'm seeing?  Tried two different stations (different brands) and no difference. 91 octane (it's all we have around here).  50,000 miles and uses absolutely no oil.

As a general question, are there major differences in the RS6 control strategies relative to 2.7T to be aware of, other than two MAFs?

Any help appreciated.

Attached file is from a 3rd-gear on-ramp pull.
Logged
vwaudiguy
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +53/-37
Offline Offline

Posts: 2024



« Reply #1 on: September 01, 2016, 08:58:51 AM »

It would be interesting to see the same car at sea level and 93. I would say those are your reasons for the pull. Was this after recently clearing the codes?  Maybe the ignition trim hasn't taken effect yet?
Logged

"If you have a chinese turbo, that you are worried is going to blow up when you floor it, then LOL."
nubcake
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +53/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 400


« Reply #2 on: September 01, 2016, 10:25:00 AM »

RS6 is very poorly calibrated from the factory. Start by adjusting fueling to properly enrich when needed.
« Last Edit: September 01, 2016, 10:50:20 AM by nubcake » Logged
AARDQ
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +11/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 338


« Reply #3 on: September 01, 2016, 10:35:39 AM »

RS6 is very poor calibrated from the factory. Start by adjusting fueling to properly enrich when needed.

Thanks, was wondering if could be a lean condition.  Looks like fitting a wideband will not be pleasant. 
Logged
Carsinc
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +17/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 447


« Reply #4 on: September 01, 2016, 11:02:58 AM »

Its my opinion that catless downpipes are a must on that car.
Logged
prj
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +1072/-481
Offline Offline

Posts: 6035


« Reply #5 on: September 01, 2016, 01:58:58 PM »

Log WBO2, lamsbg and actual won't match, it never does. It is leaner.
Also, enrich more and pull a little bit of timing. Watch IDC, it maxes injectors if you run the turbos flat out.

Nothing to do with catless DP's. It's limited by injectors first and foremost.

Also with 91 octane, I would not tune it too much... Try to get 93 or use octane booster which comes out very cheap.
Logged

PM's will not be answered, so don't even try.
Log your car properly - WinOLS database - Tools/patches
AARDQ
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +11/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 338


« Reply #6 on: September 01, 2016, 02:22:40 PM »

Excellent, thanks for the roadmap.  At this altitude I should be able to get another 2.5-3.0 psi before running off the compressor curve, which (if the injectors will support it) should yield Plus level HP.  That's the plan, anyway, for now.


Mike
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.022 seconds with 16 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.001s, 0q)