c4andmore
Newbie
Karma: +1/-2
 Offline
Posts: 11
|
 |
« Reply #60 on: February 02, 2017, 09:50:49 PM »
|
|
|
Apparently RBPE is obtaining good results by using the charge air path strategy and SY_TURBO for FI conversions. The charge air path approach can provide the basis for proper engine management for long term increased torque requirements. The crankshaft synchronous path can control the short term torque demands.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
prj
|
|
« Reply #61 on: February 02, 2017, 11:39:40 PM »
|
|
|
Apparently RBPE is obtaining good results by using the charge air path strategy and SY_TURBO for FI conversions. The charge air path approach can provide the basis for proper engine management for long term increased torque requirements. The crankshaft synchronous path can control the short term torque demands.
I don't think you understand that SY_TURBO is a compile time constant. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Nick_T
Jr. Member
Karma: +3/-1
Offline
Posts: 42
|
|
« Reply #62 on: February 03, 2017, 06:29:23 AM »
|
|
|
then it is extremely difficult.
Haha true story! Sooo still no help on pointing out where those maps might be that im looking for? or how to go around finding them....The map definitions that i have say that KFLBTS1 is my KFFDLBTS, but it cant be.... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mikhail
Full Member
Karma: +2/-4
Offline
Posts: 136
|
|
« Reply #63 on: February 03, 2017, 08:55:29 AM »
|
|
|
Have you changed the FBSTABGM to allow the BTS to work?
About exhaust manifold pics, that does the large diameter and long secondary runners spoil the (twin scroll) spool? Or is the goal to get good flush with some overlap which that design might work?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Nick_T
Jr. Member
Karma: +3/-1
Offline
Posts: 42
|
|
« Reply #64 on: February 03, 2017, 09:09:09 AM »
|
|
|
Yeah running fine on BTS fueling, its just not exactly what i set it too because of the KFFDLBTS factors. I actually have no idea! Need to do some more research!
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 03, 2017, 10:05:04 AM by Nick_T »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
prj
|
|
« Reply #66 on: February 04, 2017, 02:15:06 AM »
|
|
|
In this case what you said makes zero sense. I don't think you get what a compile time constant is in that case or how a compiler works.
Simply put the code isn't there on a NA ECU. It compiles only the code that is specified by the compile time constant. It is not something you can change without having the full source code and recompiling the firmware.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 04, 2017, 02:23:25 AM by prj »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
c4andmore
Newbie
Karma: +1/-2
Offline
Posts: 11
|
|
« Reply #67 on: February 04, 2017, 08:12:15 PM »
|
|
|
Not to worry it's already been done and works just fine.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #68 on: February 05, 2017, 01:47:41 AM »
|
|
|
Not to worry it's already been done and works just fine. You have the source code and the compiler? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
c4andmore
Newbie
Karma: +1/-2
Offline
Posts: 11
|
|
« Reply #69 on: February 05, 2017, 07:05:25 PM »
|
|
|
Nope, not my work.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Nick_T
Jr. Member
Karma: +3/-1
Offline
Posts: 42
|
|
« Reply #70 on: February 06, 2017, 01:12:40 AM »
|
|
|
Still no help to my questions  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
adam-
|
|
« Reply #71 on: February 06, 2017, 01:14:56 AM »
|
|
|
Post their work then.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DT
Full Member
Karma: +20/-1
Offline
Posts: 184
|
|
« Reply #72 on: February 06, 2017, 11:18:45 AM »
|
|
|
Apparently RBPE is obtaining good results by using the charge air path strategy and SY_TURBO for FI conversions. The charge air path approach can provide the basis for proper engine management for long term increased torque requirements. The crankshaft synchronous path can control the short term torque demands.
Sorry But I don't think RBPE's is enough skilled at C16x programming, nor has he claimed to be. But he is rather active in finding info about the various VR6 24v files and hunting offsets in Winols. I can't see the need to talk more about sy_turbo in this thread, or any thread really. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
prj
|
|
« Reply #73 on: February 07, 2017, 01:22:34 PM »
|
|
|
What is probably referred to is the factory R32 MK4 Turbo file that was made for a big name tuner by Bosch back in the days. Some people have it.
The problem with that is, it only covers the Mk4 R32 ECU. If you are using a newer platform and want CAN/DSG to work it's a no-go.
Don't even ask me to post it.
It's also not exactly a big secret that Bosch can make pretty much any file. Attributing that to random people on forums however is fucked up.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 07, 2017, 01:25:00 PM by prj »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #74 on: February 07, 2017, 01:29:04 PM »
|
|
|
It's also not exactly a big secret that Bosch can make pretty much any file. Attributing that to random people on forums however is fucked up.
Sad that the only work required for Bosch is to simply recompile the code with a different set of #defines... yet here everyone else is, scrambling for crumbs. I suppose everyone here is too young to remember that AT&T/BSD/USL mess. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
