Pages: [1] 2 3 4
Author Topic: ECU boost control on compound turbos - thoughts?  (Read 28814 times)
elRey
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +32/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 565


« on: January 31, 2017, 03:12:53 PM »

Hello all. I compound turbo'ed my wife's B6 A4 1.8T a while ago. We've daily driven it now for 2 years just on 18psi and big turbo on wastegate (6psi).

I left it alone and now would like to start up again. I've considered a few different approaches to boost control and wanted some input from this forum.

I have a 2nd N75 (for 2nd WG) and MAP with integrated IAT (between turbos) all wired into ECU. ECU can control 2nd N75, but it's only open loop right now adjustable by unisettings (adaptation channel). ECU has access to 2nd MAP and IAT as well.

I could completely duplicate existing PID control functions or just run thru existing functions twice with 2nd set of maps.

I could set low pressure (LP=big turbo) target boost independent of high pressure (HP=small, stock turbo) target boost or have a pressure ratio vs RPM map of one turbo and extrapolate target boost for both turbos.

I'm concerned both kfdmix maps (1 for each turbo) will change based on what boost the other turbo is at, requiring an infinite number of kfdmix variations.

Just thinking out load.





Logged
vwaudiguy
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +53/-37
Offline Offline

Posts: 2024



« Reply #1 on: February 01, 2017, 04:35:10 PM »

Just thinking out load.

Freudian slip?  Grin

Cool project, any pictures of the turbos?

How is the ecu controlling 2 separate n75's (separately)?
Logged

"If you have a chinese turbo, that you are worried is going to blow up when you floor it, then LOL."
prj
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +1072/-484
Offline Offline

Posts: 6040


« Reply #2 on: February 01, 2017, 05:57:41 PM »

A few notes.

1. There needs to be only one boost target.
2. You must be using some sort of bypass for the small turbo, right? That is your switch point.
3. To control the big turbo you can just write your own code. I see no point in running ME7's (broken) algorithm twice.

I have source Keil files for a standalone boost controller within the ME7 ECU that I wrote.
You will need to adapt it to the ECU and adapt the switchover, but you could use it. It is full PID with a single pre-control map.
Logged

PM's will not be answered, so don't even try.
Log your car properly - WinOLS database - Tools/patches
elRey
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +32/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 565


« Reply #3 on: February 01, 2017, 07:36:29 PM »

T3/T4 journal over the stock K03:



I've coded the ECU to use an unused PWM output based on an re-purposed adaption channel memory address.


1. 1 manifold (total) target + 1 LP target between turbos to keep both turbos as close to their efficiency islands as possible as oppose to one turbo doing more work than the other.
2. No compressor side by-pass. Intake air always goes thru both compressors. Large(LP) first, then small(HP), then IC, then manifold
3.  Any links to discussion on this broken opinion? Works good enough for me to try and utilize it and save me some custom coding work I can the use else where.

Thanks,
Rey
Logged
vwaudiguy
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +53/-37
Offline Offline

Posts: 2024



« Reply #4 on: February 01, 2017, 08:38:58 PM »

I'd love to feel what this car drives like. Compressor outlets Y'd together? Intake the same through a single Maf?
Logged

"If you have a chinese turbo, that you are worried is going to blow up when you floor it, then LOL."
elRey
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +32/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 565


« Reply #5 on: February 01, 2017, 09:17:37 PM »

No 'Y'. In series. Intake -> MAF -> T4 -> K03 -> IC -> manifold



It's nothing special to drive right now. Only running stage 2ish power for reliability. Then tuning got put on back burner while we drove it for 2 years, mainly wife.

« Last Edit: February 01, 2017, 09:21:39 PM by elRey » Logged
TijnCU
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +60/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 690


flying brick


« Reply #6 on: February 02, 2017, 03:26:44 AM »

I love this project, can't advise on tuning strategies but I will follow this! I think k03 bypass control (exhaust) is a big factor in how much power this compound will make, so in that case there is not much pressure control needed after the t3/t4 is spooled? I mean you should be looking for flow, not for boost with this concept I would say.. My first thought is to open up all gates as soon as you have spooled the big turbo  Smiley
Logged

fgtskofd
Full Member
***

Karma: +0/-13
Offline Offline

Posts: 91


« Reply #7 on: February 02, 2017, 12:09:17 PM »

Nice work,is that custom welding? Or a kit? Would never get such fun in my transverse engine bay and the transfer box
Logged
fgtskofd
Full Member
***

Karma: +0/-13
Offline Offline

Posts: 91


« Reply #8 on: February 02, 2017, 12:11:27 PM »

Why don't you just run a manual boost controller? Apparently you get faster spool times
Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +608/-168
Offline Offline

Posts: 12271


WWW
« Reply #9 on: February 02, 2017, 12:15:11 PM »

Why don't you just run a manual boost controller? Apparently you get faster spool times

lol

Please explain, mechanically, how a manual boost controller can hold a wastegate closed tighter than completely closed.

If that was sarcasm, kudos Smiley
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum
Trim heatmap tool

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your ex
turbojohan
Full Member
***

Karma: +5/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 185


« Reply #10 on: February 02, 2017, 12:30:25 PM »

i would add a bypassvalve over k03 compressor.
Will be restrictive in topend.
And use big wastegate over k03 turbine.
using stock k03 wastegate will restrict airflow and cause overspeed.

Logged
prj
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +1072/-484
Offline Offline

Posts: 6040


« Reply #11 on: February 02, 2017, 01:11:39 PM »

Yes this setup is quite pointless this way. Won't make any more power than just the K03.
You need bypass on both sides. And there needs to be only one boost target.

K03 needs big external WG and in the intake you need a Y with a switchover. Either mechanically (look at Transporter 2.0 BiTDI) or electrically (vacuum) controlled (look at BMW 535d).
« Last Edit: February 02, 2017, 01:13:12 PM by prj » Logged

PM's will not be answered, so don't even try.
Log your car properly - WinOLS database - Tools/patches
elRey
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +32/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 565


« Reply #12 on: February 02, 2017, 02:05:57 PM »

As long as the K03 can spin fast enough to generate ANY positive pressure, it will not be a restriction on the intake side. Exhaust side is a different story. However, this setup focused on simplicity, not peak power. Installing it is not much more than replacing downpipe and turbo inlet pipe.

Consider running in colder weather. Colder = more dense intake. Is there a point where ambient temp is so cold and air is so dense that K03 becomes a restiction instead of still pressurizing intake? No. Compressor takes pressue in front and multiplies it, regardless of front pressure. Instead of cold weather providing more dense pre-compressor air, the big turbo does. Same idea as elevation changes.

For the record, what is considered more that just K03 power?

If I want percise control of both turbos to maximize their efficiencies, I need two boost targets.

prj you've said twice I only need one, both times without explanation, but that's expected of you.


The big problem with this setup is the small K03 exhaust housing and wastegate. I haven't turned it up enough yet to see the problem, but I'm sure it will come up.

If I can see big turbo 22-24psi boost up top AND small turbo 20-22psi boost way down low, I'd consider this a success.

That's ~5-6psi from K03 + 16-19psi from T3/T4 up top. <- neither turbo breaking a sweat.

manual vs ecu boost control- what's the fun in having an ECU at my disposal if I don't use it as I want Smiley


The limited testing I've done has K03 still controlling final boost up to 18psi while big turbo is on wg at 6psi. I gave BT wg 10% duty with no other changes and K03 duty goes to 0% while slightly over boosting. I don't remeber exactly, but BT boost was maybe 12-14psi while K03 boost was 6ish psi at 0%.  I'll go back and look at logs.

K03 spools faster than stock.

Thanks,
Rey
« Last Edit: February 02, 2017, 02:24:56 PM by elRey » Logged
prj
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +1072/-484
Offline Offline

Posts: 6040


« Reply #13 on: February 02, 2017, 03:23:37 PM »

As long as the K03 can spin fast enough to generate ANY positive pressure, it will not be a restriction on the intake side. Exhaust side is a different story. However, this setup focused on simplicity, not peak power. Installing it is not much more than replacing downpipe and turbo inlet pipe.
Pressure is irrelevant. You will max out the compressor's flow.
Quote
If I want percise control of both turbos to maximize their efficiencies, I need two boost targets.
This is incorrect. You use the small turbo only until the bigger turbo starts producing more boost than the small one.
You need only one boost target. You can change it on switchover of course.

This setup will not make noticeably more power than just the single K03.
Because the flow of the K03 with the open internal WG is limited. You need a much bigger WG.

Also, you will max the compressor flow of the K03, overspin and destroy it.

I honestly recommend looking at some OEM solutions instead of trying to badly reinvent the wheel.
What you are doing will not work.
Logged

PM's will not be answered, so don't even try.
Log your car properly - WinOLS database - Tools/patches
elRey
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +32/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 565


« Reply #14 on: February 02, 2017, 04:17:56 PM »

So, what is 'noticeably more power than a single K03'? I guessing it's a little more than 'any more power than just the K03'. On a B6 A4 quattro that is. I'm having a hard time qauntifying this statements.

What are compressor maps used for again? overall flow or pressure ratios where flow is derived from a specified pre-compressor pressure?

Ideally small turbo will 'multiply' big turbo's boost, though slightly. So, there will be no full switch-over. Maybe you're thinking about sequential turbos?

Thanks,
Rey
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.037 seconds with 17 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.001s, 0q)