Awaken
Full Member
Karma: +3/-3
 Offline
Posts: 84
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: August 07, 2017, 09:55:42 AM »
|
|
|
Exactly, stock is -1.5 from that region and the tuner had set it to -1.5 from stock (so -3 from the picture), I wonder why that is, safety? Generally it makes sense to increase timing, but I am sure I am missing something. The dyno will show best I guess  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Awaken
Full Member
Karma: +3/-3
Offline
Posts: 84
|
|
« Reply #16 on: August 30, 2017, 03:31:39 PM »
|
|
|
Finally was able to go to the dyno. Best results were achieved with + 2.25 degrees from stock. I guess big port helps hold slightly earlier ignition with no timing pull.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
aef
|
|
« Reply #17 on: August 31, 2017, 01:28:26 AM »
|
|
|
What about your egts? The engine is bam according to your part number in the logs. Do you still have the oem egt probe and bts activated?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Awaken
Full Member
Karma: +3/-3
Offline
Posts: 84
|
|
« Reply #18 on: August 31, 2017, 10:40:11 PM »
|
|
|
I no longer have that and it is switched off, I have another one that I monitor inside. EGTs get about 940C at WOT on 4th, so that's good. The car runs about 15-20 degrees timing. I will post a graph when I get it from my laptop, which is in the car, but I noticed that I get some jumps of timing across the whole range and about +/- 4 degrees at WOT. Will add a log to illustrate little later, but in general what oscillation is acceptable in your opinion/experience?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Awaken
Full Member
Karma: +3/-3
Offline
Posts: 84
|
|
« Reply #19 on: September 01, 2017, 12:13:57 PM »
|
|
|
Here's a log of 4 runs on the dyno (attached). Is this oscillation normal?
(edit: excel obviously breaks the rules, please read two posts down)
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: September 01, 2017, 02:29:42 PM by Awaken »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awaken
Full Member
Karma: +3/-3
Offline
Posts: 84
|
|
« Reply #21 on: September 01, 2017, 02:27:46 PM »
|
|
|
jzz, there you go, the idea was to make it easier on anyone reading that...
Now that that's out of the way, any useful comment?
Also, I posted another csv with all rows that are not wot removed, is this not ok, I am not sure how strict the 'do not post edited log files' is.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: September 01, 2017, 02:32:56 PM by Awaken »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #22 on: September 01, 2017, 02:56:43 PM »
|
|
|
Those have BOTH been edited. Please upload the ORIGINAL csvs, with headers complete, so ECUxPlot can properly detect the logger used to create the cvs. Also, I posted another csv with all rows that are not wot removed
ECUxPlot handles this for you on unedited files. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: September 01, 2017, 02:58:59 PM by nyet »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Awaken
Full Member
Karma: +3/-3
Offline
Posts: 84
|
|
« Reply #23 on: September 01, 2017, 03:37:39 PM »
|
|
|
I see, the plotter tool needs the headers... ok my bad. How's this one?
edit: they are the same file, not sure how it got uploaded twice...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
nyet
|
|
« Reply #24 on: September 01, 2017, 04:03:34 PM »
|
|
|
why is your wg dc locked?
other than that, it looks pretty good.
do you expect it to spool that slow? If so, you will likely eventually see a pos deviation code unless you adjust your boost req accordingly.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: September 01, 2017, 04:05:40 PM by nyet »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Awaken
Full Member
Karma: +3/-3
Offline
Posts: 84
|
|
« Reply #25 on: September 02, 2017, 12:12:38 AM »
|
|
|
The turbo is 2871 with 0.86 a/r, it has never been able to spool quick. As for the dc I guess it is because I run 3bar map and 1.9bar boost, both of which are non standard for this car and that way they simply work, I did not tune these and am not sure.
I was only adjusting timing and fuel and if these jumps are acceptable I am happy, the car feels alright.
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: September 02, 2017, 12:14:31 AM by Awaken »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
