Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5
Author Topic: 2006 mk5 jetta 2.0 tfsi stage 2 tune  (Read 30635 times)
aef
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +69/-46
Offline Offline

Posts: 1568


« Reply #15 on: August 28, 2017, 01:36:59 PM »

Hmm, HPFP looks okay to me because its holding stock 110bar very good.
LPFP is not @ 106, you have to find the correct block. Should show numbers up to 6bar.

Dont know whats going on. How good is the fuel in your country?
How old are your Spark plugs? Correct ones?

There is lots of retard and maf diagram looks shit. (should be related)

Interested in other opinions on this as med9 is still new to me.  Roll Eyes
Logged
birchbark506
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +11/-11
Offline Offline

Posts: 414


« Reply #16 on: August 28, 2017, 01:51:28 PM »

The fuel I run in East coast Canada is shell V-power 91 octane plugs last summer with 5000km on it, change cam follower every 50,000km intake fuel pump has about 250km same as the hpfp, that is on the car currently. Should I edit maf map,
Logged
birchbark506
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +11/-11
Offline Offline

Posts: 414


« Reply #17 on: August 28, 2017, 02:43:14 PM »

I think this may be the correct block 231
Logged
birchbark506
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +11/-11
Offline Offline

Posts: 414


« Reply #18 on: August 29, 2017, 04:09:04 AM »

This is the intake. I am using like you asked
Logged
vwaudiguy
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +53/-37
Offline Offline

Posts: 2024



« Reply #19 on: August 29, 2017, 08:35:57 AM »

Hmm, HPFP looks okay to me because its holding stock 110bar very good.

On a stock tune, the fueling isn't being pushed like it is on a maxed out Stage 2. Lots of folks have fueling issues at stage 2 levels, in which case they upgrade the HPFP. Octane isn't helping.
Logged

"If you have a chinese turbo, that you are worried is going to blow up when you floor it, then LOL."
birchbark506
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +11/-11
Offline Offline

Posts: 414


« Reply #20 on: August 29, 2017, 09:54:20 AM »

The lastest fuel logs are from the stock file I could do one on the stage 2 file, and is group 231 for the lpfp
Logged
vwaudiguy
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +53/-37
Offline Offline

Posts: 2024



« Reply #21 on: August 29, 2017, 10:48:09 AM »

The lastest fuel logs are from the stock file I could do one on the stage 2 file, and is group 231 for the lpfp

Same measuring blocks, same way, both files. HPFP and LPFP request and actual. Didn't we already see with the stage 2 log that high pressure actual is below requested, and lambda is adding 25% at wot? What else do we need to know? Lower the charge pressure, or upgrade the HPFP.
« Last Edit: August 29, 2017, 10:53:49 AM by vwaudiguy » Logged

"If you have a chinese turbo, that you are worried is going to blow up when you floor it, then LOL."
aef
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +69/-46
Offline Offline

Posts: 1568


« Reply #22 on: August 29, 2017, 12:03:25 PM »

Why does he have the ignition retard?
Is it because of the maf size?
I dont know the diameter of the stock maf because its oval, not round circle.

Im out of knowledge
Logged
vwaudiguy
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +53/-37
Offline Offline

Posts: 2024



« Reply #23 on: August 29, 2017, 01:29:18 PM »

Why does he have the ignition retard?

Can't know for sure but, these things come to mind?

1. 91 octane and/or overly aggressive ignition timing/boost profile.
2. Fuel system that can't keep up. It's adding 25% which is all it can do. Clearly it needs moar.
3. Engine health

Why is/was there all this focus on the maf? I rarely see maf's fail on these.
Logged

"If you have a chinese turbo, that you are worried is going to blow up when you floor it, then LOL."
birchbark506
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +11/-11
Offline Offline

Posts: 414


« Reply #24 on: August 29, 2017, 06:45:18 PM »

The engine health see good, motor now has 250,***km  follower replaced when I did motor swap, I did notice my themostat wasn't ready correct, I am replacing that this weekend when I have a few days off,  so 91-v-power isn't the same as 93-v-power
Logged
birchbark506
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +11/-11
Offline Offline

Posts: 414


« Reply #25 on: August 29, 2017, 06:52:50 PM »

The engine health see good, motor now has 250,***km  follower replaced when I did motor swap, I did notice my themostat wasn't ready correct, I am replacing that this weekend when I have a few days off,  so 91-v-power isn't the same as 93-v-power

If someone on here has up rated hpfp guts. I'd be happy to buy it, 
Logged
aef
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +69/-46
Offline Offline

Posts: 1568


« Reply #26 on: August 29, 2017, 10:06:55 PM »

Why is/was there all this focus on the maf? I rarely see maf's fail on these.

Friend of mine mounted bigger intake/diameter@maf in his mk6r and he had -12degree across the rpm range instantly!

Logged
nyet
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +604/-166
Offline Offline

Posts: 12233


WWW
« Reply #27 on: August 29, 2017, 10:15:44 PM »

Friend of mine mounted bigger intake/diameter@maf in his mk6r and he had -12degree across the rpm range instantly!



rofl
Logged

ME7.1 tuning guide (READ FIRST)
ECUx Plot
ME7Sum checksum checker/corrrector for ME7.x

Please do not ask me for tunes. I'm here to help people make their own.

Do not PM me technical questions! Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience.
aef
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +69/-46
Offline Offline

Posts: 1568


« Reply #28 on: August 29, 2017, 10:46:03 PM »

rofl

sure...

http://www.golfmkv.com/forums/showthread.php?t=80189

@birchbark506
delete dtcs even if there are no dtcs and have a look into measurement block 32 for fuel trims
Logged
4ringpieces
Full Member
***

Karma: +4/-4
Offline Offline

Posts: 232


« Reply #29 on: August 30, 2017, 11:39:37 AM »

Carbon build up on valves? It's a big problem on bmw petrols, makes them run real crispy for some reason
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Page created in 0.022 seconds with 16 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.001s, 0q)