|
masterj
|
 |
« Reply #30 on: January 11, 2012, 09:25:14 AM »
|
|
|
UPDATED!! KFMIRL adviser version now is 1.2.
New features:
* New interface
* Added turbo type logic
* Added low load generation
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ejg3855
Full Member
Karma: +6/-0
 Offline
Posts: 118
|
|
« Reply #31 on: January 11, 2012, 10:54:12 AM »
|
|
|
UPDATED!! KFMIRL adviser version now is 1.2.
New features:
* New interface
* Added turbo type logic
* Added low load generation
Great tool, thanks! Although its really tough to use in the older versions of Excel (2003) with the fancy new graphics settings. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
masterj
|
|
« Reply #32 on: January 11, 2012, 10:56:52 AM »
|
|
|
Great tool, thanks!
Although its really tough to use in the older versions of Excel (2003) with the fancy new graphics settings.
Please update office to 2007 to be able to use all functions  |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: January 11, 2012, 10:58:29 AM by masterj »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
TTQS
Guest
|
|
« Reply #33 on: January 11, 2012, 02:24:07 PM »
|
|
|
Great tool, thanks!
Although its really tough to use in the older versions of Excel (2003) with the fancy new graphics settings.
Second that. I'm resolutely sticking to Office 2003 because it serves me well, although my wife's Macbook Pro has a 2008 version although I've never really used it for anything fancy. TTQS |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
masterj
|
|
« Reply #34 on: January 11, 2012, 03:49:01 PM »
|
|
|
Second that. I'm resolutely sticking to Office 2003 because it serves me well, although my wife's Macbook Pro has a 2008 version although I've never really used it for anything fancy.
TTQS
I was also long time Office 2003 user, but when docs started to float in docx, xlsx and such formats I had to go and upgrade. Anyway, my file is created with Office 2007 |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
masterj
|
|
« Reply #35 on: January 11, 2012, 03:51:13 PM »
|
|
|
UPDATED!! KFMIOP calculator version now is 1.3.
New features:
* New interface to match KFMIRL adviser
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
s5fourdoor
|
|
« Reply #36 on: January 11, 2012, 04:40:23 PM »
|
|
|
how about support for the variously sized tables? what about for variable rpm values?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
masterj
|
|
« Reply #37 on: January 11, 2012, 04:58:05 PM »
|
|
|
how about support for the variously sized tables? what about for variable rpm values?
Variable RPM will be in the next update. Variable table sizes won't be in near future. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
kenmac
Full Member
Karma: +6/-0
Offline
Posts: 161
|
|
« Reply #38 on: January 11, 2012, 08:16:47 PM »
|
|
|
Just curious, in v1.0 you could modify the load axis in KFMIOP and in v1.3, you cannot. Was this an intentional change?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
masterj
|
|
« Reply #39 on: January 12, 2012, 12:24:14 AM »
|
|
|
Just curious, in v1.0 you could modify the load axis in KFMIOP and in v1.3, you cannot. Was this an intentional change?
in 1.0 you could modify load, but it didn't reflect in calculations... It would be impossible to make variable load with my way of miop interpolation. You can very easily edit axis in your bin file to match with the calculator |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
sn00k
|
|
« Reply #40 on: January 12, 2012, 01:35:58 PM »
|
|
|
very easily, BUT, the problem with that is, you wouldn't WANT to change the axis in your bin-file to something from a calculator, since this axis is of great importance and often unique for how different individuals tune their car.. youre thinking in reverse here. other then that, its a really nice tool, and im sure someone can come up with a solution for this  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
masterj
|
|
« Reply #41 on: January 12, 2012, 04:18:28 PM »
|
|
|
very easily, BUT, the problem with that is, you wouldn't WANT to change the axis in your bin-file to something from a calculator, since this axis is of great importance and often unique for how different individuals tune their car.. youre thinking in reverse here. other then that, its a really nice tool, and im sure someone can come up with a solution for this I think I might come up with the solution after all, but it will take some time BTW: Please do proper tutorial how you implemented NLS and real launch control I'm very interested in this |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
s5fourdoor
|
|
« Reply #42 on: January 12, 2012, 06:06:34 PM »
|
|
|
my question regarding table sizing is that we have a few different populations on this site.
i know for a fact your tuner wizard can't be used for b5 s4's, unless i'm not understanding something, due to how your tables are sized.
would it be possible to have different versions of the spreadsheet for the differently sized tables? this is a great tool but only part of the forum members can use it because you are using a table sizing for 1.8t engines on motronic 7.5, right?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
createddeleted
Full Member
Karma: +7/-2
Offline
Posts: 90
|
|
« Reply #43 on: January 12, 2012, 10:59:18 PM »
|
|
|
my question regarding table sizing is that we have a few different populations on this site.
i know for a fact your tuner wizard can't be used for b5 s4's, unless i'm not understanding something, due to how your tables are sized.
would it be possible to have different versions of the spreadsheet for the differently sized tables? this is a great tool but only part of the forum members can use it because you are using a table sizing for 1.8t engines on motronic 7.5, right?
I think we another worksheet to be worked on as well as the ME7.5 that has been started (even though I've only been tuning 7.5's). Assuming however that this turns to a full on group project, as it should, to not overload J. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
kenmac
Full Member
Karma: +6/-0
Offline
Posts: 161
|
|
« Reply #44 on: January 12, 2012, 11:31:36 PM »
|
|
|
Being able to customize the load axis would certainly be an improvement. Your load axis only goes up to 145. Wouldn't this be an issue for folks who have load values in KFMIRL around 200? You wouldn't be able to specify a torque value in KFMIOP for the load exceeding 145. By the way, thanks so much for this utility.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
