A6turbofrance
Full Member
Karma: +0/-5
 Offline
Posts: 119
|
 |
« Reply #45 on: August 10, 2012, 06:36:28 PM »
|
|
|
a bug on kfmirl
here is the good one if someone can save the file or give me the kfmiop value that will be good
edit : just dl microsoft excel and don't work
win 64 is crap
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
A6turbofrance
Full Member
Karma: +0/-5
Offline
Posts: 119
|
|
« Reply #46 on: August 10, 2012, 06:37:55 PM »
|
|
|
can someone help me with the right kfmiop this xls don't work and me7 tuning wizard too ( give me 100 at all row and colums  ) |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
automan001
Full Member
Karma: +47/-0
Offline
Posts: 153
|
|
« Reply #47 on: May 14, 2013, 01:01:17 AM »
|
|
|
excel solution for generating KFMIOP for mbox
Great solution! I've extended it a little bit to support 16 columns of KFMIRL used in other 1.8T boxes such as 8N0906018* 06A906032* |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
automan001
Full Member
Karma: +47/-0
Offline
Posts: 153
|
|
« Reply #48 on: May 14, 2013, 01:02:18 AM »
|
|
|
can someone help me with the right kfmiop this xls don't work and me7 tuning wizard too ( give me 100 at all row and colums ) Try updated interpolator for 16x columns |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
lawer
Newbie
Karma: +0/-0
Offline
Posts: 5
|
|
« Reply #49 on: December 22, 2013, 04:32:38 PM »
|
|
|
I am reading all these but I didn't got why we have to set the max load axis of KFMIOP same as max value of FKMIRL. What I mean is what will happen if I will request 280% in KFMIRL and set 100% at load axis 160% in KFMIOP I am missing something in my brain puzzle  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bi-turbo
Full Member
Karma: +1/-7
Offline
Posts: 164
|
|
« Reply #50 on: September 01, 2014, 06:38:03 AM »
|
|
|
Would not having these the inverse of each other cause slight jump when letting off the throttle after anything near WOT?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
b4A4nowA6
Full Member
Karma: +1/-4
Offline
Posts: 117
|
|
« Reply #51 on: September 14, 2014, 06:31:49 AM »
|
|
|
So I have been doing alot of reading and would like to see what people thought about my current changes to IOP IRL and LDRXN.. Also, I created a new xdf parameter and copied nearly everything over form the previous KFMIOP and just changed over the column header values.. What do I do with the original xdf parameter for KFMIOP? Am I suppose to delete it?  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ddillenger
|
|
« Reply #52 on: September 14, 2014, 07:54:13 AM »
|
|
|
If that's a K03 you have more chance of seeing god than getting 200 load at 4500rpm. Maybe 2500rpm  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!
Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com
Email>PM
|
|
|
b4A4nowA6
Full Member
Karma: +1/-4
Offline
Posts: 117
|
|
« Reply #53 on: September 14, 2014, 09:21:35 AM »
|
|
|
OK thanks. I'm on k03 still. Sooo, more or less flip the numbers in ldrxn? I.e. High load first then taper down to low mid 120-135?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ddillenger
|
|
« Reply #54 on: September 14, 2014, 09:55:45 AM »
|
|
|
OK thanks. I'm on k03 still. Sooo, more or less flip the numbers in ldrxn? I.e. High load first then taper down to low mid 120-135?
Exactly. That turbo is capable of around 10-11psi at redline at 95 percent DC (at sealevel). |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Please, ask all questions on the forums! Doing so will ensure the next person with the same issue gets the opportunity to learn from your experience!
Email/Google chat:
DDillenger84(at)gmail(dot)com
Email>PM
|
|
|
b4A4nowA6
Full Member
Karma: +1/-4
Offline
Posts: 117
|
|
« Reply #55 on: September 14, 2014, 10:02:23 PM »
|
|
|
Exactly. That turbo is capable of around 10-11psi at redline at 95 percent DC (at sealevel).
Thanks for the help! I will keep posted |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bi-turbo
Full Member
Karma: +1/-7
Offline
Posts: 164
|
|
« Reply #56 on: September 15, 2014, 12:05:56 AM »
|
|
|
This works great bar the last 2 colums but i did those how i wanted and works perfectly
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
b4A4nowA6
Full Member
Karma: +1/-4
Offline
Posts: 117
|
|
« Reply #57 on: September 15, 2014, 02:47:10 AM »
|
|
|
Exactly. That turbo is capable of around 10-11psi at redline at 95 percent DC (at sealevel).
ok so this is the updated version. Look good? should I lower my IRL? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
b4A4nowA6
Full Member
Karma: +1/-4
Offline
Posts: 117
|
|
« Reply #58 on: September 15, 2014, 02:49:14 AM »
|
|
|
Woops, here
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bi-turbo
Full Member
Karma: +1/-7
Offline
Posts: 164
|
|
« Reply #59 on: September 15, 2014, 02:57:39 AM »
|
|
|
If your on K03 turbos 191 is the max you would want for stage 2 map (1.2 bar), for a stage 1 i would keep the max to 180 (1.1 bar)
Like whats been said standard K03 turbo's wont flow 1.3+ bar, well they will maybe once...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
